ola 57 ao1 Flashcards

lawful visitors

1
Q

lega principale governing ol to lawful visitors

A

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

“occupiers” defined under ola 57

A

someone in control of the premises ( wheat v lacon)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

premises defined under ola 57

A

land, buildings, / any fixed/ movable structure

wheeler v copas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who’s a lawful visitor under ola 57

A

invitees, licensees , someone with a contractual / legal right to enter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

common duty of care under section 2 (!) of ola 57

A

Establish a common duty of care owed to all lawful visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Under section 2 2

A

Requires occupiers to keep visitors reasonably safe for purpose which they were invited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how does ola 57 address children as visitors

A

higher duty of care owed under section 2 (3)(a)
glasgow corporation v Taylor

must be prepared that children will be less careful on their own safety
Moloney v Lambeth LBC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what should occupiers assume about young children

A

they’re being supervised by someone

Phipps v rochester corporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what must occupiers be aware of - allurement

A

potential allurement , may attract children egg bright coloured poisonous berries
( glasgow coropation v taylor)

BUT

if there’s allurement but loss isn’t foreseeable, no liability
est- jolley v London borough of Sutton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what duty is owed to tradesman and workers

A

section 23b, must guard against risks that are apart of their job

  • if the risk is something they shoudl reasonably know about , occ- not liable

roles v nathan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when is an occupier not liable for work completed by an independent contractor

A

s24b IF

  1. it was reasonable to hire an ic ( hazeldine v daw)
  2. ic was competent ( bottomley v todmorden cricket club)
  3. occupier checked worked if possible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

can occupier discharge their duty with warning sign

A

yes, under s4a, warning sign is adequate
rae v mars ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the consent defence under ola 57

A

s25
lawful visitor willingly accepts the risk
occupier not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is contributory negligence?

A

if visitor contributes to their own harm , compensation is reduced

law reform contributory negligence act 1945

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what type of test is done to determine if an occupier has met their duty

A
    • judged by whether they acted reasonably to make sure visitors are reasonably safe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

does 57 apply to all types of lawful visitors