OLA 57 + 84 Flashcards

trespass=84

1
Q

what are the two occupiers liability acts

A

57 is with permission on the premises and 84 is without so trespassing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the two types of permission in ola 57

A

express and implied permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is implied permission (57)

A

where you would expect to be able to enter eg postman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is express permission (57)

A

you are invited onto the premises eg cinema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

must inlcude who the occupier is (57)

A

must apply to situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

wheat v e lacon (57)

A

guest died at pub when falling down stairs , manager and owner were occupiers and had control over the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are premises (57)

A

s1 (3) “ land, building, any fixed or moveable structures including any vessel or vechile or aircraft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what section is common duty of care and quote (57)

A

section 2 (2) “ the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purpose which he is invited “

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

staples v west dorset (57)

A

algae on the beach, someone slipped and injured, no warnings needed as it was an obvious danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what section is children (57/84)

A

section 2 (3) (a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the two children quotes

A

” premises must be reasonably safe for a child of that age “ and 2 am occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

glasgow corporations v taylor

A

7 year old ate poison berries from a bush in park and died, no warnings or signs and acted as an allurment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

phipps v rochester corporations

A

claimant aged 5 went onto building site and fell into a trench and broke there leg, defendants not liable as no 5 year old should be alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

perry v butlins

A

three year old ran into wall so liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jolly v LB sutton

A

14 year old boy found a boat and ended up being paralysed , boat was an allurment and dangerous but it was not forseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what section is persons exercising a calling (57)

A

section 2 (3) (b)

17
Q

what is the quote for a person excercising a calling (57)

A

the occupier “will appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it

18
Q

roles v nathan (57)

A

two chinmey sweeps were killed by carbon monoxide gas occupiers nor liable as sweeps should have been aware of danger

19
Q

ogwo v taylor (57)

A

negligent fire and claimant was injured , no amount of care would have protected him , claim suceeded

20
Q

what section is independent contractors

A

section 2 (4) (b)

21
Q

what are the two reasons that an occupier will not be held liable for the work of independent contactors

A

1) they took reasonable steps to ensure the contractor is competent
2) the work has carried out properly

22
Q

haseldine v daw (57)

A

company maintaining a lift , occupier could not check there work was technical, killed claimant no one was liable.

23
Q

woodward v mayor of hastings

A

claimant slipped on a snow covered step , school had contractors to clean it but they had not checked it was clean , school liable

24
Q

what is the section for the defence of contributory negligence

A

section 2 (3)

25
Q

what is the section for the defence of volenti

A

section 2 (5)

26
Q

what is the section for the defence of warnings

A

section 2 (4) (a)

27
Q

what is occupiers liability 84

A

those without permission and those who are trespassing

28
Q

what is section 1(1) of ola 84

A

must relate to the state of the premises

29
Q

what can you do in 84 which you cant in 57

A

you can only sue for personal injury and not property but ola 57 you can do both

30
Q

tomlinson v congelton (84)

A

man entered a park as a lawful visitor and would be judged under 57 but then jumped into a lake which had warning signs, sued under 84 as trespassed the lake.

31
Q

what section does an occupier owe a duty under in 84

A

section 1 (3)

32
Q

what is the first quote required in ola 84

A

” the occupier is ware of the danger or has reasonable grounds to believe it exists

33
Q

what is the second quote required in ola 84

A

” they know or have reasonable grounds to believe that the other person is in the vivinity of danger and has reasonable grounds

34
Q

swain v natui ram puri (84)

A

boy was injured after climbing on a roof, occupier didnt have reasonable grounds to believe that the child would enter the vicinity

35
Q

scott v abd

A

2 seperate incidents , 4 years apart, no duty of care first time but there was a second time , aware they could enter the vicinity

36
Q

third quote needed for ola 84

A

” the risk in one is which in all circumstances of the case , the occupier may reasonably be expected to offer some protection from”

37
Q

platt v liverpool

A

boys playing in a derelict building , one was killed, building had a 8 foot fence and palnned demolition , not liable as they had done all that was reasonable

38
Q
A