OLA 1984 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define occupiers liability

A

S1(1)(a) - damage arising from the state of the premises or things done or omitted to be done on them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is an occupier

A

someone in control of the premises - Wheat v Lacon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a premises

A

S1(2) - includes land, buildings and any fixed or moveable structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the duty owed to unlawful visitors?

A

s1(3) duty is to keep the unlawful visitors free from injury
Duty is to take such care as is reasonable in all the circumstances to see that the trespasser does not suffer injury on the premises because of the danger - addie v dumbreck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when will the duty arise

A

s1(3)(a) D was aware of the danger or reasonably expects it exists
s.1(3)(b) D knows or has reasonable grounds to believe the trespasser is in or may come into the vicinity - Donoghue v Folkestone
s.1(3)(c) The risk is one the occupier is reasonably expected to provide protection from - Tomlinson v Congleton BC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how may an occupier avoid liability

A

S1(5) - a warning sign may be effective to discharge liability - Westwood v post office
That the premises were not in a dangerous state - Tomlinson v Congleton BC
The defendant can show they were unaware of the danger - Donoghue v Folkestone Properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the defences available under the OLA 1984

A

s1(6) volenti/consent, contributory negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the remedies available

A

damages available for:
s1(1) personal injury,
s1(9) death
s1(8) no liability for damage to property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Foreseeable harm

A

an occupier is liable for foreseeable harm even if the precise circumstances in which the harm occurs are not foreseeable - Jolley v London Borough of sutton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when will an occupier not be liable

A

ratcliff v McConnell - O will not be liable where C is injured by an obvious danger
Higgs v Foster – O will not be liable if he had no reason to suspect the presence of a trespasser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the rule in relation to child trespassers

A

Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust – the duty owed to child trespassers is the same as that owed to adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Eval points

A

The OLA 1984 offers less protection than the OLA 1957
Liability depends on when the accident occurs – Donoghue v Folkstone
Trespassers are rarely successful – public opinion impact
Child trespassers are treated the same as adults
Prior to the OLA 1984 duty was based on common humanity
Liability is only for the state of the premises
Only covers personal injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly