OLA 1984 Flashcards

1
Q

what is a trespasser

A

person who has no permission or authority to be on premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how can a lawful visitor become a trespasser

A

if they exceed the permission granted to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what can they not claim for and section

A

s.1(8) damage to property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

when will a duty arise

A

when danger is due to premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

case for danger due to state of premises

A

Sidorn v Patel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sidorn v Patel facts

A

danger arose due to C dancing on garage rather condition of premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

act that states duty is not automatic

A

s.1(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does s.1(3) provide

A

on occupier will only owe a duty if they meet 3 sections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

s.1(3) a

A

they are aware of danger or reasonable grounds to believe it exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

s.1(3) b

A

knows or has reasonable grounds to believe the trespasser is in the vicinity of the danger of may come into the vicinity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

s.1(3) c

A

reasonable circumstances expected to offer protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

are a and b subjective or objective

A

subjective, relates to the knowledge of D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

case for s.1(3) a

A

Rhind v Astubury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rhind v Astubury facts

A

did not know of fibreglass container in their lake, so not duty owed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

case for s.1(3) b

A

Higgs v foster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Higgs v foster facts

A

no reason to suspect trespasser would come within vicinity of danger

17
Q

what may be relevant for whether DOC is owed

A

time of day and year

18
Q

case for relevance of time of day and year

A

Donoghue v Folkstone properties

19
Q

Donoghue v Folkstone properties facts

A

no duty as occupier would not expect a trespasser to jump into harbour in the middle of the night in winter

20
Q

is s.(1)(3)c subjective or objective

A

both
whether danger is one occupier may be reasonably expected to offer some protection from
includes taking into costs

21
Q

case for s.(1)(3)c

A

tomlinson v congleton

22
Q

tomlinson v congleton facts

A

injured diving into lake ignoring warning sign
not reasonable to offer protection against natural feature of a lake

23
Q

s.1(4)

A

standard of care owed

24
Q

what does s.1(4) state

A

occupiers owe trespassers a DOC in reasonable circumstances so they do not suffer injury on premises by reason of danger

25
Q

is the standard of care objective or subjective

A

objective. factors taken into account include nature of premises, degree of danger, practicality of taking precautions

26
Q

case for practicality of taking precautions- not needing to spend lots of money

A

Tomlinson v congleton

27
Q

what do the occupiers owe not duty to guard against

A

obvious dangers

28
Q

obvious dangers case

A

Ratcliff v McConnell

29
Q

Ratcliff v McConnell facts

A

climbed over locked gate and dived into pool
not required to guard against obvious dangers

30
Q

obvious dangers with kids case

A

Keown v coventry NHS trust

31
Q

Keown v coventry NHS trust facts

A

young boy climbed fire escape and fell
no DOC as accident happened thru his own dangerous behaviour

32
Q

3 defences available

A

warning notices, contrib neg, consent

33
Q

warning notes statute

A

s.1(5) has to make danger clear, depends on age and understanding

34
Q

case for warning notices

A

Westwood v post office