Oh Shit Topics Flashcards
Requirements for a Restrictive Covenant Burden to Run
1) writing
2) intent to run with the land
3) touch and concern the land
4) vertical and horizontal privity
5) notice
Requirement for benefit of restrictive covenant to run
1) writing
2) intent
3) touch and concern
4) vertical privity
Equitable Servitude Burden
You get an injunction NOT damages
1) writing
2) intent
3) touch and concern
4) notice
Equitable servitude benefit
1) intent
2) touch and conern
Common Scheme Doctrine
1) when sales began, the subdivider had a general scheme or residential development which included the defendant’s lot (plat, general pattern, oral representation to early buyer)
2) Notice (AIR)
Basic Requirements of Agency Formation
Consent of both parties that the agent will act on the principal’s behalf
Control – principal control over agent
When is an agent liable for a contract made on behalf of the principal?
Agent had no actual or apparent authority to enter into the contract for the principal
The principal is undisclosed or partially disclosed
3 Steps of Dissolution of a Partnership
Dissolution
Winding up
Termination
Scope of Employment
1) Expressly authorized by the employer
2) Of the same nature as the employee’s job and motivated by a desire to serve the employer
Domestic Relations Exception to Jurisdiction
Generally federal courts will not take jurisdiction over action involving the issuance of a divorce decree, alimony, or a child custody decree.
The key is issuance. Will enforce a previously entered decree or judgment.
Joinder Requirements
1) some claim is made by each plaintiff and against the defendant relating to or arising out of the same transaction or occurrence
2) a question of fact or law common to all parties
Profit Presumption
A person who receives a share of the profits is presumed to be a partner unless the share is to repay a debt.
Issue Preclusion Definition
Issues that are actually litigated and decided and essential to the final judgment in a previous case cannot be litigated again.
Issue Preclusion Elements
1) Final judgment on the merits
2) issue actually fully litigated
3) issue was essential to the judgment
4) Due Process – used against someone who was a party in case 1 or in privity with someone in privity with someone in case 1
Mutuality Rules
Nonmutual defensive issue preclusion – person using preclusion was not a party to Case 1 and is the defendant in case 2
Nonmutual offensive issue preclusion
– person using preclusion was not a party in case 1 and is the plaintiff in case 2
Use fairness factors
1) full and fair opportunity to litigate in Case 1
2) party to be bound had strong incentive to litigate Case 1 (if small sum, less likely)
3) Party seeking to use issue preclusion could have easily joined Case 1
4) no inconsistent findings on the issue
Claim Preclusion Elements
1) Same plaintiff and same defendant
2) valid final judgment on the merits
3) Must be the same claim (same T/O)
Valid Final Judgment Requirement
Unless the court said the judgment was “without prejudice” any claim is on the merits unless it was based on
1) lack of PJ/SMJ
2) improper venue
3) failure to join an indispensable party
Final Judgment Rule
The losing party has a right to appeal if the court’s order is a final judgment.
A final judgment determines the merits of theentire case.
When does notice of an appeal need to be sent?
Within 30 days from entry of the judgment
Interlocutory Appeals of Injunctions as of Right
Orders granting, modifying, or refusing preliminary or permanent injunction are reviewable as of right despite the order not being final.
Does not include TROs
Interlocutory Appeals Act
A district judge certifies that it involves a controlling issue of law
As to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and
The court of appeals agrees to hear it
Collateral Order Doctrine
The appellate court has discretion to hear an appeal on an issue if that issue
1) is distinct from the merits
2) involves an important legal question and
3) essentially unreviewable if parties await final judgment
Certification of Class Actions Reviewablity
A court of appeals has DISCRETION to review an order granting or denying certification of a class action
Required initial disclosures
1) Identities of person with discoverable information that the party may use to support claims or defenses (names, telephone numbers, addresses)
2) Docs and things that the party may use to support claims or defenses
3) calculation of claims
4) insurance
Scope of Discovery
Nonprivileged information that is relevant to any claim or defense and proportional
Profits
A profit in land is a the right to enter and extract something from the land
Creation of Easements and Profits
PING
Prescription
Implication
Necessity
Grant
Transfer of Easements
Appurtenant – automatically transfer to the owner of the dominant estate. Can only bused by the owner of the dominant estate.
Gross – does not automatically transfer to a subsequent owner unless commercial in nature.
Transfer of Profits
Profits appurtenant cannot be used by a non-owner of the dominant estate
Profits in gross can be transferred
Fundamental Rights Standard
Strict scrutiny
Necessary/narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest
Fundamental Rights Listed
Interstate Travel and not be discriminated against in services when you move to a state
All First Amendment Rights
Voting
Marriage
Procreation
Contraception
Rights of Parents
Keeping an extended family together
reading obscene material
Bear arms
Privileges and Immunities
Forbids discrimination by a state aginst nonresidents exercising important commercial activities like pursuit of a livelihood or fundamental rights
Doesn’t apply to corporations and aliens.
Standard for Evaluating Privileges and Immunities
Necessary to achieve an important government purpose and no less restrictive means available
Dormant Commerce Clause
Violated by
1) facial discrimination against out of state commerce (unless market participant or there’s an important state interest with no reasonable alternatives like protecting fisheries from parasites)
2) Nondiscrimination but burdens commerce – invalid if the burden outweighs the state’s interest
Express preemption
A federal law may expressly say that the states may not adopt laws concerning the subject matter of the federal legislation.
Narrowly construed
Implied Preemption
Conflict v. federal law requirement such it is impossible to follow both, you go with federal
State prevents achievement of federal objective – the federal law preempts
Field preemption
A valid federal law may impliedly occupy the entire field, thus barring any state or local law even if the state or local law is nonconlficitng.
Court looks at the regulatory scheme to determine if Congress intended to preempt the entire field - federal laws are comprehensive or an agency created to oversee the area
Presumption against Preemption
Courts presume no preemption unless clear and manifest purpose of Congress
When is taking a governmental benefit a property interest under the Due Process clause?
There has to be a reasonable expectation of continued receipt
What type of process is required by the Due Process clause
Notice (reasonably calculated to inform the person of deprivation)
Opporutnity to be heard
Neutral decisionmaker
Traditional Public Forum and Designated Public Forum standards for Content Neutral
1) narrowly tailored
2) important governmental interest
3) leave alternative channels of communication
Trad Forum/Designated Pub Forum but non content neutral
Strict scrutiny
LPF and nonpublic forum
Gov forums not traditionally open to public and the govt opens it for specific speech activity – like a classroom or school gym
Govt can regulate for its intended purpose and it must be
1) viewpoint neutral
2) reasonably related to a legitimate govt purpose
If not viewpoint neutral, strict scrutiny
Content Neutral Regs
Both subject matter and viewpoint neutral are subject to intermediate scrutiny
1) advance important interests unrelated to suppression of speech
2) must not burden substantially more speech than necessary or narrowly tailored to further those interest
Defamation – Public Figure
1) false statement
2) published to a third party
3) with actual malice
4) about a public official or public figure
5) damage to the plaintiff’s reputation
Actual Malice Standard
Knowledge it was false or
reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity
Private figure on a public concern
Actual malice standard
Private Figure Defamation
1) false statement
2) identifies the plaintiff
3) published to a third party
4) negligent
5) damage to reputation
Slander Per Se
Defamatory oral statement and no proof of special damages ((pecuniary loss)) needed if
1) attacking business or profession
2) alleging commission of serious crime – usually moral turpitude
3) serious sexual misconduct
4) state that the plaintiff has a loathsome disease
Libel
Defmation in a permanent form – print, TV, podcast
Damages are presumed under the law of libel
Types of Invasion of Right to Privacy (Tort)
Appropriation of name or picture for commerical advantage
Intrusion of affairs or seclusion
Publication of facts in a false light
Public disclosure of private facts
Intrusion on Seclusion
Recover for prying or intruding in a highly offensive to a reasonable person
Can’t recover if it is done in public places
Publication of Facts in False Light
Attribute to plaintiff a fact or view they don’t hold and it must be highly offensive to a resaonble person
1A limit if it is a matter of public interest –> prove actual malice
Public disclosure of Private Facts
Disseminating private facts not on the public record that must be highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities
If public interest –> actual malice
Intentional Misrepresentation (Fraud)
Misrepresentation of material past or present fact
Knew or believed if was false when they said it or had no basis for it
Intent to induce reliance
Causation (actual reliance)
Justified reliance
Damages – actual pecuniary loss
Duty to Disclose Facts (Tort)
No general duty to disclose facts unless
1) fiduciary relationship
2) selling real property and know plaintiff is unaware of and cannot reasonably detect the material information
3) spoken and utterance deceive the plaintiff
Interference with Business Relations
1) valid k between plaintiff and third party
2) d’s knowledge of relationship or expectancy
3) intentional interference
4) Damages
Privileges to Tortious Interference
1) interfered with the p’s prospective business rather than existing K
3) used commercially acceptable means of persuasion
3) competitor of p seeking same customers
4) financial interest or responsibility for third party or responding to request for advice
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
1) Near Miss case
- zone of danger
- physical symptoms
2) bystander case
- closely related to injured party
- actually present and view injury occur
3) special relationship
- doctor, mortuary official
False Imprisonment
1) confining or restraining the plaintiff (phsyical barriers, force, threats of direct/indirect force, failure to release when duty to do it, invalid use of legal authority)
2) plaintiff is confined to a bounded area
3) Plaintiff must know of the confinement and be harmed by it
Duty to Trespassers
No duty to trespassers
Duty to Known Trespassers
Warn or make safe
1) artificial
2) highly dangerous – risk of death or serious bodily harm
3) concealed
4) known to possessor in advance
Commercial Speech Regulation
Not protected if it is
1) false
2) misleading or
3) about illegal products or services
Any other regulations upheld if
1) substantial govt purpose
2) directly advances that interest
3) narrowly tailored to serve that interest (reasonable fit, not least restrictive here)
Personal Student Speech on Campus
Cannot be censored on campus unless evidence of substantial disruption except promoting drug use on campus
Speech in Public Employment
Unprotected – private concern or make pursuant to official duties, even if on public concern
Protected – public concern but not made pursuant to employee’s duteis
Void for Vagueness
Must give reasonable notice of what is prohibited – more strict for 1A
Overbreadth Regulations Invalid
Void if it punishes substantially more speech than necessary
Facially invalid
Prior Restraints
Court orders or administrative systems that prevent speech before it occurs rather than punishing afterwards (licensing, injunctions)
Content based –> strict
content neutral –> intermediate
Look for a special societal harm
Access to Public Trials
Right must be outweighed by overriding state interest stated in a trial judge’s findings like protecting children who are victims of sex offenses
Duty to Licensees
Come on to property for own purposes (social guests)
Warn or make safe hazardous conditions
1) concealed
2) known to land possessor in advance
Duty to Invitees
Duty to invitees regarding hazardous conditions that are
1) concealed
2) known to land possessor in advance or could have been discovered by reasonable inspection
Attractive Nuisance
1) Dangerous condition on land that owner is or should be aware of
2) owner knows or should know that children might trespass on land
3) condition likely to cause injury (child can’t appreciate risk)
4) expense of remedying it is slight compared to magnitude of risk
The child doesn’t have to be attracted to nuisance to be attractive nuisance
Nonhearsay Statements under the Federal Rules
1) A testifying witness subject to cross-examination prior statements
- prior statement of identification
- prior inconsistent statement made under oath
- prior consistent statement as a rebuttal to charges they are lying or exaggerating
2) Opposing party statements or statements attributable to opposing party
- silence if a party heard and understood, capably of denying, and a reasonable person would deny
- vicarious by agents, employees, authorized persons NOT Co-parties
- co conspirators ok, partners ok
Declarant Unavailable Hearsay Exceptions
Former testimony under oath and the other party had opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony – NOT GRAND JURY
Dying declaration - homicide or civil case and they believed death was imminent and it was about cause or circumstances of what declarant believed to be their impending death (first hand not opinion or speculation)
Statements against interest (pecuniary, penal, property) - for criminal it must be corroborated
Personal or family history
Offered against party procuring unavailability
What makes someone unavailable declarant?
Dead or disabled
Privileged
refuse to testify despite court order
don’t remember
absent and court can’t get them to attend
Hearsay Exceptions Regardless of Availability
Excited utterance – startling event and under the influence of excitement
Present state of mind - concurrent with perception
State of body - spontaneous declaration of physical symptoms
Medical diagnosis - medical history, past or present symptoms, general cause – can’t accuse a person
Business records –
- regular course of business and regularly keep such records
- at time of event
- personal knowledge or within their duty to make the record
* watch out for double hearsay)
- testify to authenticity or certify
- nonoccurrence can be proved
Official records
- activities of office or agency
- observed pursuant to duty imposed, but not police observations
- in civil or v. govt in crim, but not against crim defendants , records of factual findings
Opinion/reputation
Recorded recollection – first hand, at time event made, testify its valid
Learned treatises – on direct or cross of expert – must be established as reliable and excerpt it relied on by expert
Confrontation Clause Limit on Hearsay
Despite being otherwise admissible, statements will be not be admitted if
1) statement is being offered against the accused in a criminal case
2) declarant is unavailable
3) statement was testimonial
4) no opportunity to cross-examine prior to the trial
What makes a statement testimonial?
Depends primary purpose
Primary purpose for later prosecution
Applies to affidavits or written reports of forensic analysis
To aid in an emergency is NOT testimonial
Impeachment Methods
1) prior inconsistent statements on cross-examination with chance to explain (substantial evidence if it was under oath and they can explain)
- extrinsic evidence can be used if they have opportunity to explain and adverse party examines
2) sensory deficiency
3) convictions - 10 years since release if felony and court has discretion, related to truthfulness no discretion
4) prior bad acts that relate to truthfulness (not arrests)
5) opinion/reputation testimony
6) bias
7) contradictory facts made while testifying on direct– collateral not permitted to bring in extrinsic evidence of
Impeachment of Hearsay Declarant
Don’t need to have opportunity to explain or deny a prior inconsistent statement
Civil Use of Character Evidence
Generally inadmissible to prove propensity.
Can introduce if it is essential element (fraud, defamation, child custody, negligent hiring) – all types of character evidence can be used
Criminal Use of Character
- Defendant has to open the door
- can offer opinion/reputation of good character for a relevant characteristic
- once open, prosecution can cross and ask witness about specific acts, offer opinon/repuation of defendant bad character for that trait
Prosectuion may initiate character if D raised self defense and can use all 3 types of character evidence
Character evidence v. victim
Defendant can offer it, prosecution can then rehabilitate by offering
1) evidence of victim’s good character for that trait (opinion/reputation)
2) defendant’s bad character for that trait
Rape shield
Defendant can only introduce evidence of sex crime victim’s sexual history to
1) show consent
2) challenge causation
Prior misconduct for non-character purpose
Generally inadmissible unless independently relevant
- motive
- identity
- mistake (lack of)
- intent
- common scheme or plan
need to have enough evidence to convince a reasonable jury
Prior sexual misconduct permissible in sex assault or child molestation
Authentication Methods for Tangible
Admission
Testimony
Handwriting
Ancient doc (20+ years old, right condition and place)
Reply letter doctrine - response to comm sent to author
Photo and video – witness says fair and accurate (doesn’t need to be photographer)
unattended camera – in working order
medical equipment – working order, used right, by person who qualified to operate, custodial chain to show no tampering
Oral Statement authentication
Voice id by someone familiar
Telephone conversation - knew things, answered phone when number called, recognized voice, called business number and talked about business
Self-Authentication
Public docs
private records held by public office
newspapers and periodical
official publications
notarized
trade inscriptions
commercial papers
business records, if certieid and give adequate notice
Best Evidence Rule
Must produce the original document, writing, recording or photograph if you are proving the content unless
1) satisfactory excuse for original’s absence
2) witness has personal knowledge
When does Best evidence rule apply?
1) writing is legally operative or dispositive
2) witness’s knowledge came from having read the writing
DOES NOT APPLY IF THE WITNESS HAS PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE
Federal Baseline for Competency
1) personal knoweldge of matter
2) under oath
Opinion Lay Testimony
Has to be based on witness’s perception
helpful to clear understanding of testimony
not based on specialized knowledge
Can be on
general appearance, state of emotion, sense recognition, voice/handwriting, speed of moving object, value of services, rationality of someone’s actions, intoxication
Requirements of Expert Opinion Testimony Admissibility
Qualified
Proper factual basis (personal observation, observing trial, evidence relied on by other experts)
Reasonable probability
Reliable
Judge’s Factors for Expert Witness Reliablity
TRAP
Testing of principal or methodoloy
Rate of error
Acceptance by experts in field
Peer review and publication
Medical Aid Relevance Statement
Statement offering to pay bills or culpability not admissible but fact statements made in relation to it are admissible
Settlement Negotiations Relevance Exception
Can’t be used to
1) prove or disprove validity of amount
2) impeachment via prior inconsistent statement or contradiction
But must be a dispute as to validity or amount of claim and an intention to make a claim
Nontruth Purposes
Circumstantial evidence of state of mind
Effect on the listener
403 Rule
Court has discretion to exclude otherwise relevant evidence if the probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of
prejudice
misleading the jury
confusing the jury
wasting time
cumulative
What happens when there’s injunctive and damages claims?
Jury finds facts for the damages and then the judge makes conclusion based on the facts the jury found
Do juries have to be excused during a preliminary fact determination?
Its at the discretion of the judge
must exclude if
1) involves admissibility of confession
2) defendant in a criminal case is testifying at the hearing and asks
3) justice so requires
Effect of a Judicial Notice of Fact
Judicial notices are proper for things that are generally known or can accurately and readily be determined
Conclusiveness
civil – conslusive and jury instructed to accept it as conslusive
criminal – jury is instructed that it may find it conclusive. The burden being met
Federal Common law privileges
Attorney-client
Spousal immunity
marital comms
psychotherapist/social work privilege
clergy-penitent
governmental privilege
Attorney-Client
Applies to confidential communications between lawyer-client made during consultation unless privilege is waived or an exception applies
Confidnetial communications are not prior docs, physical evidence or underlying info
Client holds in perpetuity
Exception to attorney client
aid in planning or committing a crime
legal services at issue
dispute between client and attorney
two parties claiming through same deceased client
Work Product
Privileged if made in the preparation of representation, may be breached in discovery if there substantial need and not undue hardship
Won’t be reached if it is personal thoughts, reflections
Physician-Patient Privilege
Only at state level
Had to be a professional relationship between the doctor and patient for purpose medical treatment
acquired for diagnosis
information necessary for diagnosis
belongs to patient and they can waive it
Exceptions to Dr-Patient
patient puts phsyical condition at issue
aiding wrongdoing
breach of duty and dispute between dr and patient
patient agreed in a k to waive
federal case applying federal law of privilege
Spousal immunity
Must be married at time of trial for spouse to raise it
Total immunity from testifying
Confidential Marital Comms
Held by both spouses
Applies to communications made between spouses at the time they were married
Must be made in reliance on intimacy of marital relationship
threats and abuse not privileged and if made in presence of 3rd party not privileged (young kids don’t count)
When do neither spouse related privilege apply?
1) in furtherance of crime
2) legal actions between spouses
3) disputes about crime v. testifying spouse or either’s children
Dead Man Act
Provides that a party or person interested in the event, or her predecessor in interest, is incompetent to testify to a personal transaction or communication with a deceased when such testimony is offered against the representative or successor in interest of the deceased.
Extrinsic Evidence of Bad Acts for Impeachment
A party may not impeach a witness with extrinsic evidence of bad acts
This includes documents and testimony of others