Offer and acceptance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the primary basis for a contract?

A

A contract is formed when the parties reach agreement on all the material terms of the contract. The primary basis for a contract is consensus, not offer and acceptance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an offer?

A

An offer is a proposal to contract, or the declaration of intention of the offeror to the offeree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the legal effect of an offer?

A

An offer is unilateral, and therefore it cannot give rise to binding obligations. However, a unilateral act of acceptance by the offeree may bring the contract into existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the requirements for a valid offer?

A

1) firm
2) complete
3) clear and certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Elaborate more on 1) firm

A

The offer must be firm (i.e. not timid), with the intention that its acceptance will call into being a binding contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elaborate more on 2) complete

A

The offer must contain all the material terms of the proposed agreement. Consensus must be reached on issues A, B and C - not just one of them. However, if ABC is agreed upon, then further issues D and E may be added on in a superseding contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Elaborate more on 3) clear and certain

A

The offer must be sufficiently certain (i.e. not vague), so that the offeree simply has to say yes to create the contract. If uncertain, an agreement can be regarded as void for vagueness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was held in NBS Boland Bank?

A

A party may unilaterally change the interest payable if it acts reasonably and in good faith. Hence, a contract which allows such a unilateral act is not void for vagueness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was held in Roazar v The Falls Supermarket?

A

As a general rule, an agreement that the parties will negotiate to conclude another agreement is not enforceable because of the absolute discretion vested in the parties to agree or disagree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the CPA say regarding offers?

A

1) plain and understandable language
2) disclose whether they are reconditioned or grey-market goods
3) negative option marketing is prohibited
4) right to a cooling-off period
5) catalogue marketing is regulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are advertisements?

A

Merely an invitation to do business, rather than an offer. Hence, traders put “while stocks lost” after all of their advertisements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are promises of rewards?

A

This is an offer to the public, that may be accepted by consciously responding to the advertisement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a call for tender?

A

Invitations to submit offers are not construed as acceptance of the initial offer. Rather, it is an indication that one party is looking to consider various options from other parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an auction?

A

The bidder makes and offer that the auctioneer consider and then either accepts or rejects. Auctions subject to conditions i.e. with reserve have a set price. Hence, the auctioneer is considered to be inviting purchasers to make offers. Without reserve means that the auctioneer will be making an offer to sell to the highest bidder by calling for bids.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can an offer be terminated?

A

1) rejection
2) death of either party
3) effluxion of the prescribed/reasonable time
4) revocation of the offer
5) loss of legal capacity to act
6) acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is acceptance?

A

An acceptance is a clear and unambiguous declaration of intention by the offeree, unequivocally assenting to all the terms of the proposal embodied in the offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the requirements for a valid acceptance?

A

1) unqualified
2) by the person to whom the offer was made
3) conscious response
4) in the form prescribed by the offeror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Elaborate on 1) unqualified

A

The whole offer and nothing more or less must be accepted. A qualified offer constitutes a counter-offer.

19
Q

What is the declaration theory?

A

The offeree must express acceptance, when they write or sign the letter of acceptance.

20
Q

What is the expedition theory?

A

The offeree must post their letter of acceptance. Only applies when:

  • the offer is made by post or telegram
  • the postal services are operating normally
  • the offeror has not indicated a contrary intention
  • the contract is a commercial one
21
Q

What is the reception theory?

A

The letter of agreement must reach the address of the offeror.

22
Q

What is the information theory?

A

The offeror learns or is informed of the acceptance i.e. reads the letter of acceptance. The offeror must learn of the acceptance of the offer before actual consensus can be said to have been attained. The offeror can waiver the requirement of notification in certain instances.

23
Q

What was held in A to Z Bazaars?

A

A posted acceptance creates a binding contract, and it cannot be superseded by a telegram sent later. However, the court held that the principle in Capex does not apply, and that the words ‘deliver or cause to be delivered’ cannot be read to include ‘post or cause to be posted.’ The words must be given their ordinary dictionary meaning of ‘to hand over, transfer, commit to another’s possession or keeping.’ Therefore, the contract between the appellant and the respondent was not concluded on the posting of acceptance. The telegram was received before the letter of acceptance and thus the acceptance was revoked.

24
Q

When can negotiations be broken off?

A

Parties are free to break off negotiations at any stage. However, negotiations may create the expectation of a contract and have incurred expenses. Hence, each party is expected to negotiate in good faith and to honour the legitimate expectations and interests of the other. It might be difficult to claim damages for expenditure incurred under a calculated business risk.

25
Q

What are pacta de contrahendo?

A

These are contracts about contracting, and they involve ancillary binding agreements on top of the initial central binding agreement.

26
Q

What is an option?

A

An agreement restricting an offeror’s right to revoke the offer. This keeps an offer open for a certain period of time, making that offer irrevocable. An option to buy is commonly called a call option, and an option to sell is known as a put option. This option might be transferrable to third parties.

27
Q

What does an option comprise of?

A

Comprises:

  • an offer to enter into the main agreement
  • an agreement to keep the main offer open for a certain time
28
Q

What is the legal effect of an option?

A

Creates binding obligations not to withdraw the offer, and to do nothing to prevent the coming into existence of a contract that is capable of being performed (e.g. selling to a third party).

29
Q

How long does an option last for?

A

Failure to exercise an option within the time period prescribed results in termination of the option, along with an election not to exercise the option.

30
Q

Can an option be transferred?

A

An option may be ceded, unless it has been made personal to the grantee. This rests on whether the identity of the option holder is of any importance to the grantor.

31
Q

What form does the option have to take?

A

The ancillary contract is an entirely separate contract, and so it ought not to have to be in the form of the main contract. However, it has been held (obiter) that in general, the form of both the main and the ancillary contract have to be the same [Hirschowitz]. This was overturned in Mokone v Tassos.

32
Q

What happens in the event of a breach?

A

The party faces an election: to either cancel the contract, or to enforce it.

33
Q

Elaborate more on cancellation

A

Cancel: restitution of any performances made + damages
(reliance & expectation losses)

If B cancels the option, they are entitled to restitution of the sum paid for the option (if any). They are not entitled to expectation losses (unless they would have exercised the option). If not, B cannot claim compensation, because they never sought to exercise the option anyway [Sommer v Wilding]. They may claim if they planned on ceding that option for a price. If so, B can claim expenditure in reliance on the option as well as loss of potential profit too.

34
Q

Elaborate more on enforcement

A

Enforce: specific performance + damages
(reliance & expectation losses)

If B enforces the contract, they can get an interdict prohibiting A from transferring the land to C. Once they have exercised the option, it becomes a binding contract. If there are two competing personal rights, B’s will trump C’s (prior tempore principle [Wahloo Sand]) and C will have a claim for breach of contract against A. If there was a real right that C had acquired in good faith, B would have a claim against A for damages [Boyd v Nel]. If bad faith, B could use the doctrine of notice to compel C to transfer the land to B.

35
Q

What is a preference contract?

A

An agreement whereby one person binds oneself to give preference to another person should they decide to conclude some other specified type of agreement. Examples include a right of first refusal or a right of pre-emption.

36
Q

What is a right of pre-emption?

A

A right to be given preference in the event of a sale of property. The grantor of the pre-emptive right is under no obligation to sell the property, there is merely the existence of a preferential right. A may be obliged to present an offer to B.

37
Q

What is the difference between an offer and a right of pre-emption?

A

An offer already contains a firm main offer. However, with a pre-emption agreement, there is as yet no firm offer ‘on the table’. The terms of the future offer are yet to be spelled out.

38
Q

What obligations are imposed on the grantor?

A

Imposes a negative (don’t sell without offering)/positive (you must offer before you sell) obligation on the grantor.

39
Q

What is the trigger event?

A

The positive obligation is conditional upon the occurrence of a trigger event. This is a matter of interpretation, but it has been held that nothing short of a valid offer to a third party should suffice as the trigger event [Hirschowitz]. This is to allow people to test out the market. However, if the pre-emption agreement includes a price (conditional option), then A cannot go out and test the market. Therefore, anything less than an offer will be considered to be a trigger event.

40
Q

Can the grantor free themself of their obligation?

A

The grantor cannot free themself of the obligation under the pre-emption agreement by making an unreasonable offer to the grantee. Hence, they must be willing to sell on more or less the same favourable terms to any buyer.

41
Q

How long does this right last for?

A

Used to be two months now it is a reasonable period, so as to give the grantee reasonable opportunity to consider the offer.

42
Q

What is the confusion surrounding enforcement of a pre-emption agreement?

A

Unsure as to whether specific performance may be sought. In the negative sense, B could interdict A from selling to C. However, can there be specific performance of the positive obligation to make an offer to B? There is reluctance to state so. The matter thus remains open.

43
Q

What is the Oryx mechanism?

A

Established to help B in the situation where A sells to C. In this instance, B can address a unilateral declaration of intent to A, and will step into the shoes of C and in effect create a new contract of sale between A and B on terms identical to those in the agreement between A and C. This stands alongside the A-C agreement, but because of the first in time principle, B will acquire the property - perhaps through the doctrine of notice as well.

Some questions remain:

1) can B use this mechanism when A has offered to sell to C, or must A have actually sold to C?
2) can the mechanism be used even when the sale must by law comply with certain formalities?
3) can B recover the property from C even if C was ignorant of B’s pre-emptive right at the time of the sale but acquired knowledge of it prior to transfer into their name.