Offer and Acceptance Flashcards

1
Q

Offer

A

An offer gives power to the recipient to conclude a contract by acceptance
a) Would a reasonable person receiving the communication believe that he could enter into a binding agreement with acceptance? Objective Standard in measuring INTENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lucy v. Zehmer

A

Agreement to buy property made in a bar. Zehmer claims he was joking. Judgement for Lucy.

(1) Outward manifestations are all we care about—objective view. Zehmer’s acts were not consistent with him being joking.
(2) Also implicates intoxication, Restatement Section 16.
(3) Even if Zehmer had retracted as soon as he signed the contract, he would still be bound by it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Terms of the offer

A

i) Common Law: They must be certain and definite (subject matter, price, and quantity)
ii) UCC is more liberal. As long as the parties intend to create a contract, the UCC will apply and fill empty gaps. Usually, these still require a quantity (not price) term. Though requirements and outputs contracts allow that term to remain open as well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sun Printing v. Remington

A

(Enforcement of Contracts with Open Terms)

Sun buys paper from Remington for 16 months. Price was set for 4 months and then left open (allows them to re-negotiate) with a cap set according to an index (Canadian Export Paper’s price). Remington defaulted because it could sell at higher than index price elsewhere.
(1) The court says the open price term was essentially an agreement to agree and thus illusory. Ambiguity over the duration of the price term, and the court refuses to impose their own meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Termination of an offer

A

i) Lapse of time: if offer specifies a time range (if not—reasonable time)
ii) Death/mental incapacity of the Offeror (even if offeree doesn’t know)
iii) Rejection
iv) Counteroffer
v) Revocation: can be revoked by Offeror anytime prior to acceptance. Offers are revocable unless a fee or premium is paid to the Offeror.
vi) Destruction/illegality of subject matter
vii) Terms of offer include condition and condition fails to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ford Motor Credit v. Russell

A

(is an ad an offer?) Advertisement for a car with set financing level. Someone comes in who cannot qualify for the level of financing and sues.

i) An advertisement is not an offer; it is an invitation to bargain.
ii) Objectively reasonable person standard—would someone actually expect that this is an offer?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pepsi Co

A

harrier jet commercial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Restatement Section 24

A

offer defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Restatement Section 17

A

A manifestation of mutual assent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A communication which advertises to parties that designated property is for sale at a price “not below $X”….

A

it is not an offer but an invitation to bid with a price floor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When ordering goods…

A

the order is the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Offeror is the master of the offer …

A

and can dictate the form and manner of the offeree’s acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Firm Offers

A

UCC, 2-205—an offer to buy/sell goods cannot be revoked if:

a) The Offeror is a merchant
b) There are assurances that the offer is going to remain open
c) The assurance is contained in an authenticated writing from the Offeror
d) If there is no stated time period, a reasonable term is implied. Cannot exceed 90 days. (Past 90—you need consideration)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Merchants

A

A person who regularly deals in the type of goods involved and any businessperson when the transaction is of a commercial nature. 2-104, UCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mid-South Packers v. Shoney’s

A

Shoney’s buys meat from Mid-South. Mid-South gives them a price list (firm offer) with a provision that any increases will get 45 days’ notice. Price increase and Shoney’s won’t pay for the higher price over the first 45 days.

i) Court says from the original posting of price-list, firm offer lasted for 3 months—this meant Mid-South could change it as much as it wanted after that period.
ii) Shoney’s could have performed under protest, pursuant to UCC 1-308, and reserved the right to challenge the price increase. They did it secretly though, so the court won’t rule in their favor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mirror Image Rule, Common Law (Last Shot Rule)

A

Acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer. Any modifications of the terms is a rejection of the offer and a subsequent counteroffer.

17
Q

Davis v. Satrom

A

Davis wanted to buy mobile park home. Series of offers and responses with modifications. This fails mirror image rule, each response was a rejection and counteroffer. Judgement for Satrom.

(1) Offeror is the master of the offer; he can dictate the timing, method of acceptance, etc.

18
Q

Ardente v. Horan

A

Ardente buys Horan’s house. Plaintiff signed and returned a purchase agreement with a deposit check and a separate note asking about the status of various household furnishings. Defendant wouldn’t sell. No contract, as Horans rejected Ardente’s counter-offer.

(1) Mirror Image Rule
(2) This was a “Quibbling Acceptance”

19
Q

Restatement Sections 32 and 62

A

Allow acceptance by performance –>Germans accepted terror/Cuba accepts missiles

20
Q

Restatement Section 45

A

Commencement of performance in response to unilateral offer confers an option contract on the offeree—a right to complete the performance if he chooses to do so. —>Allies complete performance WW2

21
Q

Battle of the Forms, UCC

A

Additional or different terms included in acceptance of an offer don’t constitute a rejection unless the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer. Deals with sale of goods (not necessarily merchants)

22
Q

(UCC) If between a merchant and a non-merchant or two non-merchants:

A

Additional terms are proposals for addition to the contract that are to be separately accepted or rejected in order to be incorporated into the contract (unless made expressly conditional on consent to those terms).

(1) Essentially, if 2-207(2) doesn’t apply because parties are not both merchants, the common law rule will kick in which says that there was a contract and the new terms are proposals for post-contract modification. These terms must be expressly agreed to (silence is not acceptance) in order for them to take place

23
Q

If between merchants:

A

Additional terms are treated as part of the contract unless they materially alter the terms of the contract or the Offeror objects within a reasonable time. When terms alter the original terms, some jurisdictions use the Knock-Out rule and let the UCC fill in the gaps

(1) Materially alter: negate warranties, allow seller to cancel upon buyer’s failure to meet invoice, reduce time to file complaints to an unreasonable level, etc

24
Q

UCC allows acceptance by:

A

any reasonable medium, including starting performance.

25
Q

Mailbox Rules (Common Law):

A

i) Offers take effect when they reach the intended party

ii) Acceptances—take effects as soon as they are put out of the offeree’s possession (once they’re in the mailbox).

26
Q

Merced

Merced County Sheriff’s Employees’ Ass’n v. County of Merced

A

Mistakes in contract formation. Contract between county and sheriffs/firefighters. Confusion over how to calculate price increases, despite articulation in the actual contract.

i) County had reason to know that they interpreted the calculation differently from the sheriffs, and that the sheriffs were unaware of the discrepancy—unilateral mistake. Apply the sheriffs meaning.

27
Q

Mistakes

A

A legal mistake for which a court may grant a remedy is a belief that is not in accord with the facts as to a basic assumption on which the contract is based, which materially affects performance of the contract

28
Q

Restatement Section 20

A

Effect of Misunderstanding–>(By 1920, effects of WWI misunderstood).

i) There is no mutual assent to an exchange if the parties attach materially different meanings to their manifestations and neither party knows or has reason to know the meaning attached by the other or each party knows or has reason to know the meaning attached by the other (mutual mistake of fact)
ii) The manifestations of the parties are operative according to the meaning attached to them by one party if that party doesn’t know of any different meaning attached by the other and the other does know of the meaning attached by the first, or that party has no reason to know of any different meaning and the other party does have reason to know (unilateral mistake)

29
Q

Unilateral mistake

A

(Merced)
Only one party is mistaken to an essential element of the contract and the mistaken party didn’t bear the risk of the mistake. Either party can enforce the contract on its terms, unless:
i) The non-mistaken party knew or had reason to know the other party was mistaken
ii) The non-mistaken party had a duty to disclose the fact about which the other party was mistaken

30
Q

Mutual mistake

A

(Peerless–> ships)
Both parties are mistaken as to an essential element of the contract. There must be a substantial difference between the deal as it was contemplated and the actual deal with no intent by the parties to take that risk of the transaction.
f) Misunderstanding: A contract requires a meeting of the minds (mutual assent), so no contract exists when both parties do not intend the same thing.

31
Q

Double AA

A

Home depot solicited bid that Double AA won based on its solicited bids from numerous sub-contractors. One of the subs refused to perform according to their bid (which said it was good for 30 days). Double AA gets a substitute and sues for price difference.

i) Subcontractor’s offer is irrevocable until the general has a chance to accept after winning the contract. This is a promissory estoppel-type rationale
ii) Soliciting bids is just an invitation to make an offer. Subs make offers that cannot be revoked until there’s a chance to accept/reject. Non-binding invitation for offers.
iii) Industry specific rule due to the nature of construction contracts
iv) When a general contractor submits its own bid, it does not constitute an acceptance of the subcontractor’s bids that it uses.
v) Promissory Estoppel/Options contract case. Once Sub makes an offer, it becomes an option for the general contractor.

32
Q

Options Contract

A

Promise not to revoke an offer for a specified time. It is its own contract which must be supported by consideration

i) Hamilton Bancshares