Offer and Acceptance Flashcards
AO1 DEF (TvL)
An OFFER is a statement of the terms which a person is prepared to be bound by a contract. It’s made by the offeror to the offeree, and must be communicated (TAYLOR v LAIRD)
If Rel:
AO1 BI
A bilateral offer requires both parties to do something (TAYLOR v LAIRD) E.g an offer to pay money for goods
If Rel:
AO1 UNI
A unilateral offer requires just the offeror to do something (CARLILL v CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL) E.g offering a reward for finding a lost pet
If Rel:
AO1 TEND
An invitation to tender will be classed as a unilateral offer, if the lowest price is to be accepted (BLACKPOOL AERO CLUB v BLACKPOOL BC). E.g Unilateral offers are auctions without reserves
If Rel:
AO1 TREAT
An invitation to treat isn’t an offer so can’t be accepted. It’s an indication 1 person is willing to negotiate, encouraging a bilateral offer from another.
E.g. Advertisement (PARTRIDGE V CRITTENDEN)
Goods on display (FISHER v BELL, PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GB v BOOTS)
An auction with reserve (BRITISH CAR AUCTIONS v WRIGHT)
Giving information in response to a request (HARVEY v FACEY)
If Rel:
AO1 COMMUNICATE
An offer must be communicated to the offeree (TAYLOR v LAIRD)
If Rel:
AO1 CONSIDERATION
For an offer to remain open until a particular time/date, the offeree must give consideration to the offeror, such as a deposit (ROUTLEDGE v GRANT)
AO1 COUNTER OFFER
Counter-offer (HYDE v WRENCH)
AO1 REVOCATION
Revocation (BYRNE v VAN TIENHOVEN) This must be communicated before acceptance, by offeror or 3rd party (DICKINSON v DODDS)
AO1 TIME
Lapse of time (RAMSGATE VICTORIA HOTEL v MONTEFIORE - 4 MONTHS)
AO1 DEATH
Death (BRADBURY v MORGAN)
If Rel:
AO1 CONDUCT REVOKE
With unilateral offers, if conduct indicates acceptance, the offeree must give can’t be revoked if the expected conduct continues (ERRINGTON v ERRINGTON and WOODS)
If Rel:
AO1 AWARE
If a party is aware goods have been sold, this counts as revocation
AO1 MIRROR
The ACCEPTANCE must ‘mirror the offer’
If Rel:
AO1 POSITIVE CONDUCT
It must be unconditional and communicated to the offeror by positive conduct and not silence (FELTHOUSE v BRINDLEY)
If Rel:
AO1 DISADVANTAGE
Where an acceptance is required to be made in a certain way, it’ll generally be sufficient if it’s made in any other way, as long as it doesn’t disadvantage the offeror (MANCHESTER DC v COMMERCIAL and GENERAL, YATES v PULLEYN)
If Rel:
AO1 CONDUCT
Acceptance can be communicated through conduct (REVIELLE v ANOTECH)
If Rel:
AO1 POSTAL
Under the ‘postal rule’, acceptance is communicated at the time of posting, not when the offeror receives it (BYRNE v VAN TIENHOVEN). It doesn’t need to arrive but the postal rule won’t apply if the offeree makes a mistake in posting (GETREID v CONTIMAR). The postal rule can be excluded by the agreement if the parties.
If Rel:
AO1 ELECTRONIC METHODS
For electronic methods, acceptance takes place when the offeror receives it. Law is unclear. Exactly time of acceptance depends on sound business practice and what’s the reasonable expectation of the parties (BRINKIBON v STAHAG STAHL)
If Rel:
AO1 UNAWARE
An offer can be accepted even if the claimant was unaware the offer existed (GIBBONS v PROCTOR)