Offer, acceptance and invitation to treat Flashcards
what does consensus in idem mean
- an agreement on the same thing’
- or informally known as ‘a meeting of minds’
what creates a contract
the consensus
what are the three steps to contract completion
- invitation to treat (optional)
- Offer
- Acceptance
what must the acceptance of the offer be to create a contract
must be unqualified
what is the mirror theory
offer and acceptance is identical to create the consensus in idem - any variation of the offer kills the original offer
what is bargaining
In bargaining the parties will haggle over terms
in what terms is meaningful negotiation true
in many pre-contractual situations, like between private persons buying and selling a house, car or text book
what is an offer
Indication by a person to another of his willingness to enter into a contract with him on certain terms - can be expressed or implied
what is a contract of adhesion
puts the commercial company making the offer in a stronger position than the consumer who can accept or reject, but not negotiate
when do contractual negotiations begin
with a general indication of one’s willingness to negotiate - invitation to treat
facts of the case Harvey v Facey 1893
- Potential sale of a house in Jamaica (belonging to Facey)
- Communication through a telegraph
- No contract was concluded by the parties - Facey didn’t directly to respond to Harvey asking if he will sell him the house, Facey saying the house was £900 was information, not an offer
what was held in Gibson v Manchester City Council 1978
exact wording matters, if there’s any qualification then its not a legal offer
how to distinguish offers from invitations to treat
- Treat every case on its merits
- Look at exact words used by parties
- Context
what case states that advertisements are invitations to treat
Patridge v Crittenden 1968
case facts of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1893
But, advertisements can be occasionally offers - advertisement placed by a manufacturer can be presumed to be an offer
case that held that vending machines are treated as offers
Thornton v Shoelane Parking (1971)