Offer&Acceptance Flashcards
Valid offer
clear, certain (Gibson v Manchester City Council; Storer v Manchester City Council) and communicated (Taylor v Laird)
General rule is that advertisement is merely an invitation to treat
Partridge v Crittenden
Exceptions to the general rule (advertisement)
- unilateral offer (Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co)
2. where advertiser is a manufacturer (Grainger & Son v Gough)
Unilateral offer
clear prescribed act performance of which constitutes acceptance (Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co)
Invitations to tender are merely an invitation to treat
Spencer v Harding - no contract, as the circular was simply a proclamation of intention and was thus an invitation to treat; the tenders were offers which the defendants were free to accept or reject
Exception to the general rule (Invitations to tender)
Harvela Investments v Royal Trust - where the invitation to tender expressly contains an undertaking to accept the highies or the lowest bid
Blackpoll & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council - if a bid is properly submitted in accordance with the terms of the invitation, it is promised that the bid will be considered. So it is an offer to consider the bids, not to accept them. An invitation to tender could give raise to a binding contractual obligation to consider tenders conforming to the conditions of tender, because 1) the tenders had been solicited by the Council from specified parties who were known to the Council; 2) there was an absolute deadline; 3) the Council had laid down absolute and non-negotiable conditions for submission.
Auction sales - the auctioneers request for bids is an invitation to treat
Payne v Cave - the bidder makes an offer which the auctioneer is then free to accept or reject. Acceptance of the bidder’s offer will be indicated by the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer. The bidder may revoke the offer any time before the hammer falls.
Auction sales without reserve (i.e. involving a promise to sell to the highest bidder and promising not to apply any reserve price)
Warlow v Harrison - where the sale is expressed to be without reserve there are in fact two contracts. 1) bilateral contract, which determines who is entitled to the goods. 2) unilateral contract based on the promise that the auction will be without reserve. If a reserve is applied and the goods are withdrawn from the sale there is a breach of a unilateral contract and the highest bona fide bidder is entitled to be compensated by the payment of damages.
Highest bidder is not however entitled to the goods since this is dictated by the bilateral contract for sale
Barry v Davies
Offer may be communicated to a particluar person, group of persons or to the whole world
Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co
Counter offer
rejects original offer - Hyde v Wrench
Butler Machine v Ex-cell-o Corp - the buyers order was a counter offer which the sellers accepted by completing and returning the acknowledgment.
Request for information
Stevenson, Jacques v McLean - asks about ancillary matter due to the outfit, rather than essential term of the offer and the language is interrogatory
Offer may be revoked
before the acceptance - Payne v Cave; Routledge v Grant
Options
Dickinson v Dodds - where the offeree gives consideration to keep the offer open for a period, there is separate binding contract known as an option and revocation within the period will be in breach of contract
consideration
must be sufficient, not adequate - Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestlé Co Ltd
Where revocation is communicated by post
it takes effect from the moment it is received by the offerree and not from the time of posting - Byrne v Van Tienhoven
Revocation communicated by third party
Dickinson v Dodds
Revocation of unilateral offer
at any time prior to the completion of the required act - Great Northen Railway Company v Wtham