Offer Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Features of a valid contract

A

1 - offer
2 - Acceptance
3 - Intention to create legal relations
4 - consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1 - Offer

A
  • express willingness to contract made with the intention that it shall become binding
  • must be sufficiently specific and comprehensive to be capable of immediate acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2 - acceptance

A
  • turns a specific and comprehensive offer made with the intention to be bound into agreement
  • final and unqualified expression of assent to the terms of an offer
  • communicated to offeror
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 - intention to create legal relations

A
  • must intend to enter legally and enforceable agreement, under which all rights and liabilities can be enforced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4 - Consideration

A
  • element of value in contract which supports agreement between both parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Objective approach

A
  • courts adopt position to look at all external factors form the position of the reasonable person - not what they think but what they said or did
  • courts want to be obective to prevent parties from claiming they didnt mean something
  • allow bussiness certianty and reliance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Invitation to treat

A
  • statement indicating that the maker is willing to make offers
  • not made on the ground that it shall become legally binding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Invitation to treat - cases

A

1 - Partridge v Crittenden (1968)
2 - Fisher v Bell (1961)
3 - Pharmaceutical society of GB v Boots Cash Chemist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Partridge v Crittenden (1968) - ITT

A

D ad for sale of Bramblefinch cocks and hens, stating that the price was to be 25 shillings for each. Under the Protection of Birds Act 1954, it was unlawful to offer for sale any wild live bird -> established that advertisement is ITT and not an offer, unless it is clear from the language used that it is intended as an offer

FIscher v Bell -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fisher v Bell (1961) - ITT

A

D was shopkeeper displayed in his shop window a flick knife accompanied by a price ticket displayed just behind it. He was charged with offering for sale a flick knife, contrary to s. 1 (1) of the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 -> display of the knife was not an offer of sale but merely an invitation to treat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3 - Pharmaceutical society of GB v Boots Cash Chemist

A

-all price labels on shelves /displays are ITT until brought to the till where it becomes an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Invitations to tender (ITTEND)

A
  • tendering - choosing a company to supply goods or do a job nu asking several companies to make offers
  • exceptions: when a party specifically binds themself by expression of intention e.g., to highest or lowest offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ITTEND - Cases

A

1 - Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust Co. of Canada (CI) Ltd [1982] 2 All ER 966
2 - Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council [1990] 3 All ER 25

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ITTEND -Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust Co. of Canada (CI) Ltd [1982] 2 All ER 966

A

-D held shares in company. and they invited the claimant and the second Dt to make an offer to purchase shares by sealed tender, in this invitation they bound themselves to accept the highest offer. C made bid for a fixed sum; the second D made bid for a fixed sum or alternatively for ‘$101,000 in excess of any other offer’, whichever was to be higher. The first D accepted the bid made by the second D, despite the fact that the fixed sum which they offered was lower than that offered by the claimant ->referential bid was invalid, and as such, the first defendant was bound to accept the claimant’s offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ITTEND - Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council [1990] 3 All ER 25

A

-D were a local authority that managed the local airport, C were allowed to operate casual flights out of the airport, when up for renewal and the tender invitation was released to the C and other companies - The tender had a clause stating that tenders would not be considered if they missed the time and date deadline stipulated. - the court held that where particular rules or stipulations are included as part of an invitation to tender, then the recipients of the tenders must abide by them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Request for information + Case

A
  • inquirer or person responding to request for information does not intend to be bound
  • Harvey v Facey [1893] AC 552 it was held that a party may supply information in the course of negotiations without giving any commitment to go through to a firm agreement.
17
Q

Death of an offer

A

1 - revocation
2 - Rejection
3 - Lapse of time
4 - Occurrence of a condition
5 - Death

18
Q

1 - Revocation

A
  • an offer can be revoked at any time until it is accepted - Payne v Cave (1989)
  • where a second offer made it revokes proceeding offer - Pickfords v Celestia [2003]
  • must be communicated to offeree before can take effect - Byrne & Co v Leon van Tien Hoven & Co [1880]
  • can come from reliable source - Dickinson & Dodds [1876]
  • reasonable steps to publicise - Shuey v US (1875)
  • even if offeree fails to read it
19
Q

2 - Rejection

A
  • temrination of an offer so that it can no longer be accepted - tinn v Hoffman (1873)
  • counter offer - attempt to accept the offer on new terms and conditions (reject original offer)
  • Hyde v Wrench [1940] - W offered to sell farm for £1000, H rejected and offered £950 - > court found counter offer rejected original one
  • takes effect when communicated to offeree
20
Q

3 - lapse of time

A
  • an offer which expressly states it will last for a specified time cannot be accepted after that time
  • Dickinson v Dodds - offer open till 9am so cant be accepted after
  • if duration not limited by offer then terminate after lapse of reasonable time - Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montegiore [1866]
  • period of acceptance may be extended if offeree indicated intention to accept and is known by offeror
21
Q

4 - Occurence of a condition

A
  • an offer which is expressly made to determine on the occurrence of some condition cannot be accepted if that condition hasn’t occurred
  • Financings Ltd v Stimson [1962] - a condition in a hire purchase contract that a car would remain undamaged prior to agreement
  • if conditions relating to offer fails to be satisfied then offer cant be accepted
22
Q

5 - Death

A
  • Re Whelan [1897] - Whelan guaranteed a partnership account with bank but died and bank continued for further month after finding out
  • the offeree cannot accept after he is notified of the offeror’s death