Offences Against The Person Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Assault

A

An assault is any conduct by which D intentionally or recklessly cases V to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence

Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comissioner
R v Savage and Parmenter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus Reus of Assault

A

D caused V to apprehend immediate force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Immediacy?

A

Smith v Superintendent of Woking Police - looking through window

R v Ireland; R v Burstow - silent phone calls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

D’s ability to carry out the threat

A

R v Lamb - D pointer unloaded gun and V knew it was unloaded therefore there was no fear therefore no assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

D’s words negating the threat

A

Tuberville v Savage - ‘if it were not assize time I would not take such language’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

D’s words as a conditional threat

A

Blake v Barnard - if you’re not quiet I’ll blow your brains out - D acquitted

Read v Coker - a conditional threat is still a threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Battery

A

A battery consists of the infliction of unlawful personal violence by D upon V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Actus Reus of battery

A

D inflicted personal violence on V

Faulkner v Talbot - battery is the touching of another person, without the consent of that person and without lawful excuse. It need not be hostile or rude or aggressive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Problem : implied consent and ‘everyday personal contact’

A

Collins v Wilcock - generally consent is a defence to battery and most of the physical contacts of ordinary life are not actionable because there is implied consent by all who move in society and so expose themselves to risk of bodily contacts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can be act or omission

A

Fagan v Met Police Commissioner

DDP v Santana Bermudez - battery by omission based on creation of danger duty in Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Direct Battery

A

R v Savage and Parmenter - D threw drink on V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Indirect Battery

A

R v Martin - caused stamped at theatre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mens Rea of battery

A

D intended or was subjectively reckless as to, the application of force or touching to V

R v Venna - kicking police officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Actus Reus of Actual bodily harm

A

D commits an assault or battery on V which caused actual bodily harm

R v Roberts - battery in car and girl jumped out ( reasonable foreseeability test )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mens Rea of actual bodily harm

A

D intended or was subjectively reckless as to the assault or battery on V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CPS charging standards for ABH

A

The loss or breaking of teeth

Temporary loss of sensory functions inc loss of consciousness

Extensive or multiple bruising