Oedipus Scholarship Flashcards
Wyle’s view on Oedipus’ hamartia
Oedipus’ hamartia is his arrogance, leading to hubristic behavior and his awful temper. Wyle’s sees his hamartia as a fatal flaw.
Wyle’s giving negative characteristics
Oedipus’ character caused the events before the play to occur: he tried to escape his fate – arrogant but understandable – resulting in it being fulfilled; his hot temper led to his killing Laius; he is proud of being a riddle solver but this was what led him to fulfil his fate/marry his mother
Wyle’s view on fate and responsibility
Oedipus’ own quest and character which motivates the action and leads to his realisation of the truth and suffering.
Rutherford on fate and suffering
“This is not a play of crime and punishment” (Oedipus does not suffer because he did something wrong, but because of fate)
Rutherford on fate and responsibility
Fate is not entirely fixed. Jocasta chooses to commit suicide; Oedipus chooses to blind himself, fulfilling Tiresias’ prediction.
Rutherford on double determination
The divine power and the human agent are working together, hardly separable.
Knox on Oedipus’ Character
the “Sophoclean hero” – inability to hear/understand is a key characteristic e.g. Oedipus won’t listen to Jocasta.
Knox on Hamartia
Aristotle does not mean us to think of hamartia as a “moral flaw”. A hamartia is a mistake. Oedipus does have moral flaws (he is human) but his hamartia is his offence (killing his father, marrying his mother) committed in ignorance.
Know on fate and free will
Oedipus is not a puppet. In Greek eyes, fate is predictable and inescapable but within it there is choice and freedom of action
Knox on character and free will
Oedipus’ own character leads to him discovering the truth: “what causes his ruin is his own strength and courage, his loyalty to Thebes, and his loyalty to the truth. In all this we are to see him as a free agent. And his self-mutilation and self-banishment are equally free acts.” [Knox gives positive characteristics her
Knox on religion
In Sophocles, the gods are not “just” but they are “real” and must be worshipped. This reflects contemporary worries during the War/plague.
“The play is a tremendous reassertion of the traditional religious view that man is ignorant, that knowledge belongs to the gods”.
Finglass on the downfall of Oedipus
The reversal in the play is that Oedipus goes from being the one who shows pity to being the one who is pitied [Note that most scholars, from Aristotle onwards, see the key reversal as going from being most successful ruler to being a powerless and most deeply suffering subject; Finglass gives a different emphasis]
Finglass on Oedipus’ motivation
Oedipus is enraged by Tiresias not because of his horrible temper but because of his passion to help his people.
Garvie on detective story
Much of the play’s “appeal for modern readers may derive from its resemblance in some respects to a detective-novel”. (It is not about his crimes but about his discovery of them and reaction to that discovery
Garvie on Oedipus character and downfall
“In one sense Oedipus does not fall at all….He never says ‘I wish I had not found out’; for he has gained what he values most – knowledge no matter what it costs.” We admire him for that.