Odomirok - GAAP Flashcards
Which came first SAP or GAAP?
GAAP came first and SAP evolved from it over time on a state by state basis
What is the fundamental difference between GAAP and SAP
- It is driven by the intended user
- GAAP is primarily used by investors who are focussed on earnings
- SAP is used by regulators and is thus focused on solvency
- SAP is focussed on insurance companies ability to pay claims while GAAP is focussed on earnings.
- SAP is thus more conservative
All companies use GAAP, but only insurance companies use SAP
What are the key areas of difference between GAAP and SAP?
BASIC D3ING + PDF
- Balance sheet presentation of reinsurance
- Anticipated Salvage/subrogation
- Structured settlements
- Invested Assets
- Ceded Reinsurance
- -
- DAC
- DTA
- Discounting Loss Reserves
- Non-admitted assets
- Goodwill
- +
- PDR (Premium Deficiency Reserve)
What is the difference between SAP and GAAP regarding balance sheet presentation of prospective reinsurance?
- SAP liabilities are shown NET of reinsurance on the balance sheet. No separate asset shown for ceded reinsurance recoveries since liabilities are net.
- GAAP liabilities are shown GROSS of reinsurance on the balance sheet
- G = GROSS
- GAAP needs a separate asset with “anticipated ceded reinsurance recoveries” so that everything balances.
- Similar Concept for UPR as GAAP UPR is Gross.
SAP Net L&ALAE Rsv = GAAP Grs L&ALAE Rsv - GAAP Reins Recov (Asset)
SAP no seperate ASSET becuse reserves NET, GAAP seperate ASSET as reserves Gross.
What is the difference between SAP and GAAP regarding balance sheet presentation of retroactive reinsurance?
- GAAP Treatment
- a separate asset is established for ceded reserves. Any gain (if ceded rsv > than amt paid) is deferred and amortized over time
- No Immediate Impact on income or surplus as amortized over time (ie matching)
- SAP Treatment
- undiscounted ceded reinsurance reserves are recorded as a negative write-in liability (or contra-liability).
- The gain is recorded as a write-in gain and goes to other income
- Gain = (negative write-in liability) – (cost of reinsurance) ]
- Stays in special surplus until actual paid recovery exceeds amt paid for reinsurance
What is the difference between SAP and GAAP regarding DAC?
- GAAP defers acquisitions because this more accurately reflects the matching of expenses over the policy period.
- Remember GAAP is focussed on profitability over time (going concern)
- SAP recognizes these costs up front as these expenses are not available to meet obligations in event of liquidation.
- SAP focussed on solvency and these expenses are not available to pay claims
No DAC in SAP. If you think there is DAC, then you are a SAP :)
The difference here is really due to the fundamental diff between GAAP and SAP.
What is a Premium Deficiency Reserve (PDR)
A PDR exists when the unearned premium reserve (UPR) is insufficient to cover the anticipated costs.
Must be calculate by policy grouping, can’t offset the PDR of one grouping with profits of another grouping.
PDR must be recognized with a charge to current operations
How do you calculate the PDR under SAP?
- For each Policy Group determine SAP Profit (UPR - PV Loss + Inv Inc)
- SAP PDR is the max(-SAP Profit, 0) for each group
- Basically this means the SAP PDR = SAP Loss, but not offset by profit in other groups.
Note we don’t account for DAC here since already expensed.
How do you calculate the PDR under GAAP?
- For each Policy Group determine GAAP Profit (UPR - PV Loss + Inv Inc - DAC)
- Note for GAAP we calc profit after subtracting out DAC
- Initial Premium Deficiency equals max(-GAAP Profit, 0) for each policy group
- Final PDR = MAX(0, Premium Deficiency - Orig. DAC)
- Reduce DAC to offset Premium Deficency, but can’t go below 0
- DAC can reduce to 0 to lower PDR.
- Can not use DAC from profitable premium groups to offset, so can have both PDF and DAC.
Final DAC = Max(Original DAC - Intial Premium Deficieny,0)
How are bonds (invested assets) treated differently between SAP and GAAP?
A GAAP vs. SAP Difference (Invested Assets)
**SAP: Based on Quality of Bond
* NAIC 1-2 (Investment Grade) are held at amortized cost
* NAIC 3-6 (Below Investment Grade) are held at the lower of amortized cost or fair value.
GAAP: Based on Intent of Investment
* HFT (Held for Trading / Intent to Sell within hours/days): Fair Value
* HTM (Held to Maturity / Intent to keep) - Amortized Cost
* AFS (Available for Sale / after 1 year before maturity) - Fair Value
GAAP = What’s the value as ongoing concern, SAP = Value at liquidation.
How are stocks/equity (invested assets) treated differently between SAP and GAAP?
A GAAP vs. SAP Difference (Invested Assets)
SAP: Based on Quality of Equity
* Common Stock are held at fair value
* Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock
* NAIC 1-2 held at fair value
* NAIC 3-6 held at lower of fair value or cost
* Redeemable Preferred Stock
* NAIC 1-2 held at lower of fair value or amortized cost
* NAIC 3-6 held at lower of fair value, cost, or amortized cost
GAAP: Based on Intent of Investment
* HFT (Held for Trading / Intent to Sell within hours/days): Fair Value
* AFS (Available for Sale / after 1 year before maturity) - Fair Value
* Thus Stock Always held at fair value
Note Stock can’t be held to maturity so no HTM category
GAAP = What’s the value as ongoing concern, SAP = Value at liquidation.
How are structured settlements handled differently between GAAP and SAP?
- On certain liability claims an insurance company may purchase from a life insurance company with the beneficiary being the original claimant.
- When full release is given (ie agree to settle for future annuity payments then SAP and GAAP are the same:
- The cost of the annuity is recorded as a paid loss
- When full release is not given then
- GAAP treats the annuity as a reinsurance recoverable, where it maintains the reserve, but sets up a reinsurance recoverable asset.
- SAP treats the same as if there is full release (paid loss), but requires the company disclose the amount of these contingent liabilities in Notes to Financial Statements
What is the treatment of ANTICIPATED SALVAGE AND SUBROGATION in GAAP vs. SAP?
SAP:
* Either Unpaid Loss is stated either gross or net of salvage, but if net of salvage then the amount must be stated in Schedule P
GAAP:
* Unpaid loss amounts are stated net of salvage.
How is loss reserve discounting handled between SAP and GAP
- In both cases, very limited discounting is allowed.
- Only on WC and other long term disability claims may use discounting
- In the case of tabular reserves, SAP and most states are silent but typically 3.5% is used.
- For non-tabular reserves, should be in accordance with ASOP 20, but capped at:
- The company’s net rate of return on statutory invested assets minus 1.5%
- The current yield to maturity on a U.S. Treasury debt instrument with a duration similar to the payment of the claims
GAAP is the same is SAP, but allows for a reasonable alternative.
What is the difference between SAP and GAAP regarding non-admitted assets?
- GAAP - All assets are allowed!!!!
- Supports GAAP purpose as all assets are relevant for a company as a going concern
- SAP - disallows certain assets of low liquidity, such as furniture because these are not liquid after an insolvency
- Supports SAP’s purpose of liquidity after insolvency.