Occupiers Liability- Lawful Visitors Flashcards

1
Q

What is an occupier?

A

no statutory definition

person with control over the premises at the time of the incident

(maybe more than one occupier)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Wheat V Lacon

A
  • occupier is the person in control of the premises at the time of the incident
  • there can be more than one occupier

(Visitor fell down stairs and died)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bailey V Armes

A

No one in effective control

a boy living in a flat above a supermarket would play on the roof, his friend got injured when he fell of the roof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are premises

A

The only statutory definition
s.1(3)(a) Occupier’s Liability Act 1957

‘any fixed or moveable structure including any vessel, vehicle and aircraft’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957

S.2(1)

A

the occupier owes the COMMON DUTY OF CARE to all lawful visitors in respect of personal injury due to the STATE OF THE PREMISES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

COMMON DUTY OF CARE

A

to take reasonable care in all the circumstances to make sure the visitor will be REASONABLY SAFE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

lawful visitor

A

legitimate visitor; anyone with a lawful right to be on the premises- authorised to be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lawful visitor may be awarded?

A

Compensatory DAMAGES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the 1957 act only applies…

A

if the visitor is carrying out activities that are authorised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A lawful visitor can become and unlawful visitor

A

a trespasser if she exceeds her permission or enters a prohibited area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Laverton V Kiapasha Takeaway

A

The occupier only has to make the premises REASONABLY SAFE for visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the standard of care applied is that of…

A

the reasonable man, the occupier must guard against risks that are reasonably foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rochester Cathedral V Debell

A

reasonably foreseeable risk

A REAL SOURCE OF DANGER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the occupier owes child visitors?

A

the common duty of care
plus and ADDITIONAL SPECIAL DUTY

( must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults)

MUST BE REASONABLY SAFE FOR A CHILD OF THAG AGE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Glasgow Corporation V Taylor

A

occupier should guard against allurement (attraction) that puts the child visitor at risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Phipps V Rochester Corporation

A

the occupier may not be liable where very young children are injured because the occupier can expect parents to supervise

17
Q

the occupier owes a trades person?

A

the common duty of care

18
Q

tradesperson s.2(3)(b)

A

when carrying out activities within their trade they should ‘appreciate and guard against any special risk ordinarily incident to it…’

19
Q

Roles V Nathan

A

and risks incidental to their work

can be a defence for the occupier