Occupiers Liability Act 1984 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Before OLA 1984

A

Occupiers owed no duty to trespassers except not to deliberalty recklessly inflict injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Addie v Dumbreck 1929

A

Child injured on eqiupemt in field after trespassing through hole in fence. no duty owed pre OLA 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definition of Occupier

A

s.2(a) OLA 1984
‘Person occupying or having control over an fixed or movable structure, including a vehicle or vessel’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duty applies to

A

Duty applys to all those who aren’t lawful visitors
Lawful visitors to sites specified under the National Parks & Access to Countryside Act 1949

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

No Reason to suspect trespasser

A

Higgs v Foster 2004
- Police officer fell into uncovered pit when surveilling, he was judged to be an unlawful visitor.
even though the occupier knew of the risk he had no reason to suspect a trespassser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Child Tresspassers + Case

A

Same Statutory rules.
Keown v Coventry NHS Trust 2006 - 11year climbed external fire escape and fell.
Court of Appeal held that since the child appreciated the danger, there was no danger due to the state of the premises
Hospital not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defences

A

Contributory Negligence
Consent (Volenti)
Warnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Defence of Contributory Negligence

A

This defence can be applied to reduce damages payable by preparation the judge thinks reflects the claimants responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Defence of Consent (Volenti)

A

Defence for when the claimant appriceates the nature and degree of risk not just it’s existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Defence of Warning
+ Section

A

s.1(5) OLA 1984
‘Occupier may discharge duty by taking reasonable steps to give warning of the danger’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Establish Claim

A
  • Injury due to state of premises
  • Occupier aware of danger
  • Occupier reason to suspect trespasser
    -Risk against which the occupier would be expected to take precautions
  • Occupier taken reasonable care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Injury due to state of premise

A

Ratcliff v McConnell
- Climbed fence and jumped into pool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Occupier aware of danger

A

Rhind v Astbury water park
- submerged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Risk which occupier may be expected to take precautions

A

Tomlinson v Conglenton Borough Council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Occupier taken reasonable care

A

Warnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly