occupiers liability 57 Flashcards
occupiers liability act 1957
occupiers of premises owe duty of care to lawful visitor, if duty breached, compensation for personal injury or damage to property.
what is an occupier
s.1(2)- person in control of the premises- don’t need to be living in premises
- no-one in control then no claim
-can share control (i.e 2 defendants)
case example for occupier
wheat v Bacon and co- paying guest falls downstairs with a faulty bannister and no lighting
what are premises
s.1(3) premises are fixed or movable structures including vessel, vehicle and aircraft. however, there is no statutory definition of premises.
what are lawful visitors
S.2(1)-occupiers have a common duty of care to all lawful visitors
-invitees- people who have expressed permission to enter
-licensees- person who have express or implied permission to be on the land for a specific period
-contractual permission- someone who has Bought a ticket
-statutory duty-meter readers, bailiffs, police exercising warrant.
standard of care- duty towards adults
s.2(2) premisses must be reasonably safe
2 part test- occupier must make premises reasonably safe for the visitors not guarantee their safety
-must be real source of danger
key case-Debelle v rochester
s.2(3) duty towards children
occupiers should be prepared for children to be less carful than adults
-premises must be reasonably safe for a child of that age
-Allurments, occupiers must force child would be allured to the danger
key case- Glasgow corp v Taylor girl dies after eating poisonous berries next to a play ground, reasonably foreseeable
s.2(3)(b)- duty towards skilled visitors/ tradesman
same duty as adults apply, but worker has to guard themselves from associated risks with their trade.
Guard against any special risks relating to their trade.
example- roles v Nathan- two chimney sweeps died from carbon monoxide poisoning. they have been warned of risk but carried on.
defences- only covered if relevant
first defence
warning notices- the notice must enable visitors to be reasonably safe.
where danger is extreme or unusual, may need more than warning notices such as barriers.
key case- cotton v derbershire, c fell off of cliff
s.2(4) independent contractors
the D can pass liability onto an independent contractor if they caused the premisses to be unsafe. there is a 3 part test that must be satisfied
1) reasonable to entrust the work o a contractor
2) reasonable steps taken to ensure the contractor was competent
3) reasonable steps take to inspect the work
key case- Haseldine V Daw, lift plunged to bottom
what are other relevant defences
s.2(1)- exclusion clauses- law reform act 1945 two part test
1) c failed to take c are fro their own safety
2) failure to take care contributed to damage suffered
if successful Judge will decide % reduction
other defence part 2
s.2(5) two part test consent
1) was c aware of the risk
2) was the risk accepted freely