Occupiers Liability 1957 Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of Occupier’s liability 1957
What statute/section?

A

s1(1)(a) OLA 1957
- “An occupier of premises owes a common duty of care to visitors”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Key elements of establishing OLA 1957

A
  • Premises
  • Occupier
  • Lawful Visitor
  • Common Duty of Care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a Premises?
Where is this defined?

A

S1(3)(a)
Any fixed or moveable structure, including any vehicle, vessel, or aircraft
- Wheeler v Copas (ladder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an Occupier?
Where is this defined?

A

Common law

  • Wheat v E Lacon - “If a person has any degree of control over the premises, it is enough.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a Lawful Visitor?

A

Anyone of premises with Occupiers permission, express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain examples of Implied Permission with cases

A
  • Repeated visits (Lowry v Walker)
  • Statutory right of entry (s2(6) OLA 1957)
  • can be exceeded - Harvey v Plymouth CC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain Common Duty of Care - how its established, features etc

A

Roles v Nathan:
- Duty of Care same as in Negligence
- incremental approach taken to establish duty

Occupiers need not guarantee safety of visitors, only reasonable care
- Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the duty of care owed to children?

A

Must be prepared for Children to be less careful than adults
- Glasgow Corporation v Taylor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the duty of care owed to specialist visitors (I.e. Professionals)?
- Cases?

A

Specialist will be aware of/ protect themself against risks within his own specialism
- Roles v Nathan (chimney)
- Ogwo v Taylor (negligent fire)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Defences for OLA 1957

A

Consent (Volenti)
- Geary v JD Weatherspoon PLC

Exclusion Clauses
- White v Blackmore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly