OCCUPIERS LIABILITY 1948 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

trespasser

A

Persons on the occupiers land who have no permission or authority to be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 1 (8)

A

Death and personal injury are the ONLY protected forms of damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 1 (3)

A

a.) The occupier is aware of a danger or has reasonable grounds to believe that it exists, and
b.) The occupier knows or has reasons to believe the other is in the vicinity of danger or may come into the vicintiy of danger, and
c.) The risk is one in which, in all circumstances of the case, the occupier may reasonably be expected to offer the other some protected.
CASE LAW: Donoghue v Folkstone Properties Ltd (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Standard of care

A
  • objective

- if not met = breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Section 1(4)

A

Take such care that is reasonable in all the circumstances of the case to see that the other does not suffer.
CASE LAW: RATCLIFF V MCONNEL (1977)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ratcliff v McConnell (1977)

A

Locks and warnings were sufficient. D not liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Donoghue v Folkstone Properties Ltd (2003)

A

It woupd be reasonable to guard against that in the summer time, but not at the time of winter. D is not liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Section 1(4) must be premises that is dangerous not activity

A

Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust (2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

S 1(5) warnings and warning signs

A

Duty may be discharged (reach the standard of reasonable occupier) by giving warning or discouraging others from taking the risk.
CASE LAW: TOMLINSON V CONGLETON (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tomlinson v Congleton (2003)

A

State of premises not dangerous, what C chooses to do is up to them. D is not liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust (2006)

A

The premises is not dangerous. Therefore D is not liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defences

A
  • volenti - s1 (6)
  • contributory negligence
  • exclusion of liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

volenti - s1 (6)

A

Common duty of care does not impose an obligation on occupiers in respect of risks willingly accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

contributory negligence

A

Damages may be reduced under the Law Reform (contributory Negligence) Act 1945 where the treapasser fails to take responsibility to tske reasonable care for their own safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Exclusion of liability

A

Is not expressly forbidden by the Act so it may be possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly