Occupiers' liability Flashcards
What is the occupiers’ liability act 1957?
duty of care owed by those who occupy real property, through ownership or lease, to people who visit or trespass
Who is an occupier?
no statutory definition but someone who owns or is a tenant of the premises
what case shows there can be more than 1 occupier and that it is the person who has control over the premises?
Wheat v Lacon & Co Ltd
what is the definition of ‘premises’ and where is it from?
S1 (3)(a) of occupiers’ liability act 1957 - ‘fixed or movable structure, including any vessel, vehicle and aircraft’
what are the 4 types of lawful visitors?
- invitees
- licensees e.g. workers
- contractual permission e.g. people who have bought ticket to football
- statutory right e.g. police on warrant
what does s2(2) of the act say?
occupier doesn’t have to make the premises completely safe, only have to do what is reasonable
how safe does a premises have to be and what case shows this
premises doesn’t have to be completely safe but occupier has to make it REASONABLY safe
Laverton v Kipasha
what 2 things did Dean and chapter of Rochester Cathedral v Debell state?
a. tripping, slipping, falling, are everyday occurrences
b. risk is reasonably foreseeable only where there is a real source of danger
what is the occupiers’ liability to children and what section of the act shows this?
s2 (3)
occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults and the site must be reasonably safe for children of that age
what case shows that occupier has to protect child visitors from allurements?
glasgow Corporation v Taylor
What is the rule when there is a very young child and case?
where very young children are injured, occupiers are rarely liable as there should be supervision from a parent or guardian
Phipps v Rochester Corperation
What did Jolley v Sutton state?
Occupier is liable for injuries suffered by children that are reasonably foreseeable
What is the occupiers’ liability to tradespeople and where is this from?
s2 (3)(b) - a person will appreciate and guard against any special risk ordinarily incident to it so far as the occupiers leave him free to do so
basically - occupiers wont be liable where tradesmen fail to guard against risk they should know of
case for occupiers’ liability concerning tradesmen
Roles v Nathan
What does S2 (4) of the occupiers’ liability act say about torts of independent contractors?
list of 3
- must have been reasonable for the occupier to have given specialist work to that contractor - specialist work = specialist worker
- contractor must be competent to carry out work and occupier should take recommendations or references
- occupier must check work has been properly done