Occupier’s Liability - Topic 13 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who is an occupier?

A

The person who ‘controls the premises’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the importance of the case Wheat v Lacon?

A

There can be more than one occupier in a premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the importance of the case Harris v Birkenhead Corporation?

A

You can be the occupier of an empty house

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the importance of the case Bailey v Arms?

A

There can be no occupier sometimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a premise?
Give 5 examples

A

Premise - any land and buildings on the land
E.g sheds, bridges, scaffolding, veichle or aircraft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the duty of care owed under s2 (2) of Occupiers liability act 1957?

A

To take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premesis for the purpose for which he was invited or permitted by the occupier to be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened in the case of Laverton v Kipasha and what is the importance of this case?

A

Laverton slipped but the takeaway had slip resistant tiles and mopped frequently so it was no ones fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in the Rochester Cathedral v Debell and what is the importance of the case?

A

Debell tripped on some raised concrete by a bollard but it was an accident and so no ones fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in the case of Cole v David - Gilbert and what is the importance of this case?

A

Cole tripped on a hole in the ground from where 2 years prior to this there was a May pole and so it was no ones fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does s2(3)(a) of the occupiers liability act 1957 state?

A

The occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults…[and as a result]….the premesis must be reasonably safe for children that age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in the case Glasgow corporation v Taylor?

A

In the park a 7 year old ate poisonous berries
Council was liable because the poisonous berry bush wasn’t closed off and a 7 year old wouldn’t know any better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in the case Phipps v Rochester corporation?

A

5 year old was out with his 7 year old sister
5 year old fell down a trench
Council wasn’t liable because parents should have been keeping an eye on their child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happened in the case Jolley v London Borough of Sutton?

A

Council hadn’t moved an abandoned boat
Two 14 year old boys decided they wanted to fix the boat
They jacked the boat up and it fell on top of them
Eventually it was decided that the council were liable because it was reasonably foreseeable for kids to play on an abandoned boat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does S2(b) of the occupiers liability act 1957 state?

A

An occupier can expect that a person in the exercise of his calling will appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it so far as the occupier leave him free to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What happened in the case Roles v Nathan?

A

Two chimney sweeps were warned off the carbon monoxide poisoning
They still went up the chimney and so died
The occupier of the house wasn’t liable because they’d warned the chimney sweeps and they both still decided to go up the chimney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened in the case Haseldine v Daw?

A

Plaintiff was killed when a list plummeted to the ground
Occupier wasn’t liable because they had hired a competent firm
So the firm was liable for not doing their job properly

17
Q

What happened in the case Bottomely v Tormordon?

A

Firework display with a stunt team at a cricket club
Someone watching the show was injured
Cricket club tried to pass blame to the stunt team however the cricket club hadn’t checked wether the stunt team was insured
Turned out the stunt team wasn’t insured and so the cricket club was therefore liable for not checking they were hiring a competent firm

18
Q

What happened in the case Woodward v The Mayor of Hastings?

A

Outside contractor learned snow from the school steps but hadn’t checked the ice
Student fell and was injured
School was liable because a reasonable person could have checked for the ice there was no need for a specialist to check for ice