Occupier's Liability - Finished Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Occupier’s Liability

A

A field of tort that concerns the duty of care owed in a reasonable or unreasonable visit to a piece of land whether it is lawful or trespassed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 Acts that deal with Occupiers Liability

A

Occupiers Liability Act 1984
Occupiers Liability Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the use of the Occupier’s Liability Act 1957

A

A
Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 deals with lawful visitors
Allows compensation for personal injuries and also damage to propert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the main remedy that is seeked by defendants in Occupiers Liability

A

Compensation (financial benefits)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Occupier

A

No statutory definition for Occupier
Usually a person that owns a property, land etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Lawful Visitor

A

A visitor to a property with permission
Usually contractual permission or statutory rights of entry (police etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What duty does an Occupier (owner) have to a lawful visitor

A

Occupier has a responsibility to make sure that the visitor is safe at a reasonable level when under their supervision/liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exception to Liability of Occupier

A

No liability if the danger is obvious and the trespsser is an adult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

To what extent must an occupier ensure their visitors are safe
- Laverton v Takeaway

A

Occupier must ensure the visitors are safe to a certain extent
- Laverton visited a takeaway shop on a wet busy day
- Floor was mopped but Laverton still slipped and broke ankle
- Takeaway did their best to limit damage so are not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the main concept of the Laverton v Takeaway case

A

The premises do not have to be completely safe – The occupiers just have to take reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the difference between the 2 legislations concerning OL

A

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 deals with lawful visitors
Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 deals with trespassers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Wheat v Lacon
- Explain summary of the Case

A

Employee of a brewer in a public house was staying over as a paying guest
- Stayed in the private area which wasn’t safe (suffered injuries after falling through hole)
- The staircase was unlit; it was not dangerous to those using it whilst taking the appropriate care, so weren’t guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Invitee

A

A person who comes onto another’s property, premises or business establishment upon invitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give an example of an expressed and implied invite, in terms of OL

A

Expressed - A verbal or written request by the property owner of occupant for another to come to the property for the purpose of providing a service to the owner or occupant (cleaner)

Implied - A corner shop being open to public is implying that anyone of public can access it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is there a significance when referring to care towards children

A

Children have much more limited minds in comparisons to adults
They may not have the development of making right and wrong decisions
Easily succeptible to Allurment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the OL Act 1954 say about children

A

Occupiers should be prepared for children to be less careful than adults and the premises must be reasonably safe for a child that age

17
Q

If there is an allurement, can the Occupier be liable

A

No, if the damage is not foreseeable the occupier cannot be liable

18
Q

What 2 exceptions allow the occupier to become not liable with a case with the involvement of a child

A

If the damage was not foreseeable
If a parent was meant to be suprevising the child (Phipps v Rochester)

19
Q

What is the liability occurance when a trade is taking place

A

If a tradesman is injured while under terms of trade, the occupier is liable as they owe them a duty of care if they are on the occupier’s land/premises
However the injury must be related to the source of trade

20
Q

Can a tradesman working on a traintrack sue an occupier for being hit by a random car that appears on the track

A

No, the occupier must be able to protect the tradesman from an incident occuring to a certain extent, but not if it was unforeseeable.

21
Q

What is the occupier’s role in staff’s faults in concerns to damages

A

Occupier must insure staff hired are trained accordingly with experience, insured and know what they are doing.

22
Q

What happens if the incident that occurs is not in the hands of the occupier

A

If the injury is not related to the premises, the occupier can be liable

23
Q

What are the 3 requirements of s2 of the OL Act 1954

Contractor

A

The occupier must’ve not been able to do the work themselves, as to why they hired someone else
Contractor hired must be suitable for the job role; references and insurance must be checked
Occupier must check the work has been done properly

24
Q

Haseldine v Daw

Lift - Contractor

A

Cliamant was killed when lift plunged fastly down
- Occupier couldn’t do work themselves so hired someone else
- Not liable

25
Q

Define Defence

A

A reason, that most commonly a defendant will use, which exempts them from being liable of an offence

26
Q

What is contributory Negligence
- How can it be used as a defence

A

Damages may be reduced under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 where the visitor fails to take reasonable care for their own safety
- If a person isn’t able to act in a safe manner themselves, the occupier cannot be held liable

27
Q

Warning Notices - s 2(4) Act 1957

A

It shows that a warning sign is insufficient when showing signs of danger
However if the danger is obvious, no addition sigsn are necessary

28
Q

Can a warning notice be used as a full defence or partial

A

Full Defence

29
Q

Rae v Marrs

Ditch - Inspector

A

Surveryer was conduction inspection on a premises
- Went into a dark room and fell into a 3 feet deep hole
- Should’ve used his torch so was contributorily negligent in not using his torch
- Partially reduced the claim of damages

30
Q

What is the use of the Occupier’s Liability Act 1984

A

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 deals with trespassers
Only refers to personal injuries, not damage to property

31
Q

Define Trespasser

A

Someone that enters a prohibited area under no contractual visit, or legal acceptance to be there

32
Q

When does an occupier owe a duty of care to a trespasser according to s1(3) of the OL 1984 Act

A

a) He is aware of the danger
b) Knows that a trespasser is in the area
c) Knows that there is a risk against which he should provide protection

33
Q

Tomplinson v Congleton

Lake

A

Trespasser
Man dived in a lake which had warning signs
Held occupier not liable

34
Q

Is there any difference in defences used for trespassers and lawful visitors

A

No - Majority of defences areused are the same

35
Q

What is the difference between occupiers liability and general negligence

A

Occupiers liability deals with people in reasonable or unreasonable grounds of permission to be on a land, whereas general negligence refers to a general duty of care

36
Q

What type of approach is the OL Act 1957 and the OL Act 1984

A

OL 1957 - Objective
OL Act 1984 - Subjective

37
Q

What is a similarity between both Acts

A

The particular damage needs to be identified before the occupier’s duty of care can be established

38
Q

If the occupier of a premises had absolutely no knowledge of a fault/risk, which legislation would be used in court

A

OL Act 1954

39
Q

Dylan and Jamie’s house is right next to the Co-op. They are playing football in their garden. Dylan kicks the ball over the fence, where it lands in the yard at the back of the shop. There is a ‘No trespassing- employee access only’ sign on the side of the shop. Dylan jumps over the fence and makes his way across the yard to fetch the ball. On his way, he slips on an oil patch left by a delivery truck and breaks his leg

Will Dylan be successful in a claim again Co-Op using Occupier’s Liability

A

AO1
Which Act is going to be used - OL Act 1984
Definitions of premises, unlawful visitors and occupiers
Are they children - Yes, so must be taken into account
When does an occupier owe a duty of care to a trespasser
Trespassers must be kept reasonably safe to an extent

AO3
Just merge all of AO1 into Extract

Come to a conclusion