Occupier's Liability Act 1957 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Section 2(1) OLA 1957 deals with

A

Visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

S2(2) OLA 1957 deals with

A

Adult visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

S2(3a) OLA 1957 deals with

A

Child visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

S2(3b) OLA 1957 deals with

A

Skilled workers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

S2(4a) OLA 1957 deals with

A

Warnings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

S2(4b) OLA 1957 deals with

A

Independent contractors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

S2(5) OLA 1957 deals with

A

General defences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the two general defences to this Act?

OLA 1957

A
  1. Consent

2. Contributory negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

s2 (6) OLA 1957 deals with

A

Visitors who are exercising a right conferred by law e.g. firefighters or police officers with warrants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Unfair contract terms.
s2(1) says what?
s2(2) says what?

A
  1. O cannot exclude liability for death or PI

2. O can exclude liability for loss of of or damage to property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Wheat v Lacon & Co

A

O is someone who has control over the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme

A

O has to make sure that visitors are “reasonably safe in using the premises for the purpose he has been invited or permitted by the O to be there.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dean and chapter of Rochester cathedral v Pebell

A

O has to make sure that visitors are “reasonably safe in using the premises for the purpose he has been invited or permitted by the O to be there.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Glasgow v Taylor

A

Allurements must be safeguarded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Phipps v Rochester Corporation

A

Os do not owe a duty of care to very young children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rae v Mars Ltd

A

Warnings must be sufficient to tell the V how to avoid danger

17
Q

Nathan v Roles

A

Skilled workers in the are expected to appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it

18
Q

Hazeldine v Daw

A

It should be reasonable to subcontract Os work

19
Q

Bottomley v Tomorden cricket club

A

O should check to a reasonable extent that the independent contractor is competent

20
Q

Woodward v Mayor of Hastings

A

O should take reasonable care to ensure that the work is done.

21
Q
Allurements
def by common law:
A

“Things attractive or enticing to children but which conceal danger”

22
Q

How much care should the O take?

OLA 1957

A

Visitors should be

“reasonably safe in using the premises for the purpose he has been invited or permitted by the O to be there for”

23
Q

What are the 3 vague elements Of OLA 1957

A
  1. Establishing duty of care
  2. Breach of duty
  3. Resulting damage
24
Q

Note about warnings and children:

A

Warning may not be adequate to children as they may not appreciate the danger of the risk so additional steps may be needed to safeguard them.