Occupier's liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What Act relates to lawful visitors?

A

Occupier’s Liability Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case shows the OLA applies to fixed or movable structures?

A

Bunker v Charles Brand & Son Ltd.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is a lawful visitor?

A

Someone invited onto the premises or has a contractual right to enter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the four areas that need to be clarified in relation to visitors?

A

Those on a public right of way are not covered by this act - McGeown, those who have implied permission such as postmen, Limitations on permission as in The Calgarth - stairs and bannisters, and a person may be a visitor in relation to one person and a trespasser to another - Ferguson v Welsh.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do occupiers owe a lawful visitor?

A

A common duty of care which is to take steps to make sure a visitor is reasonably safe. This is shown in Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the common duty only extend to?

A

The purpose for which the visitor was allowed to enter as in Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is an occupiers duty to children different?

A

They must be prepared for children to take less care and so if a child is allowed to enter a premises it must be reasonably safe for a child of that age - Glasgow Corp. v Taylor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can the courts allocate blame to parents?

A

Yes, in Phipps v Rochester Corp if the parents did not act as they should’ve done then they will be responsible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is the duty different for a visitor who is present as a result of a calling?

A

This person must guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it - General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas. However in Salmon v Seafarers Restaurant where a fire was started negligently a member of the fire brigade could claim against those who started the fire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When will an occupier not be liable for a persons injury?

A

When an independent contractor performs a service which the occupier could not be reasonably expected to check had been done correctly - Haseldine v Daw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must an occupier do if there is a danger to escape liability?

A

They must give warnings unless the danger is obvious like a cliff as in Cotton, if the warnings are ignored the person becomes a trespasser.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What Act relates to trespassers?

A

The Occupier’s Liability Act 1984.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When is a duty to trespassers established?

A

If a reasonable occupier would have drawn the inference that there was a danger,
The presence of a trespasser was likely,
The duty is then to take reasonable care that the trespasser does not suffer injury from a danger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who is a trespasser?

A

A trespasser is a person who goes onto land without an invitation, and whose presence is unknown to the occupier, or if known, is
objected to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What case established that claimants who undertake potentially risky activities should bear some responsibility?

A

Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case decided that if an occupier is unaware of the possibility of a trespasser the occupier is not liable?

A

Higgs v Foster.

17
Q

What is the common law on child trespassers?

A

In Keown v NHS a boy climbed a fire escape and fell. No duty of care existed as the fire escape was not faulty.

18
Q

What case shows that a warning’s suitability depends on the age of the child.

A

Westwood v Post Office (said Obiter Dicta).

19
Q

What defences are available against a claim?

A

Where a a trespasser willingly accepts a risk then goes onto take it anyway as in Titchener v British Railways Board.

20
Q

What case was the first to recognise the rights of a trespasser?

A

British Railways Board v Herrington 1972.