Occupier's Liability 1957 & 1984 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How is an occupier defined in Wheat v Lacon?

A

Anyone with ‘ownership or control’ of a property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Premises: ‘a f___ or m_____ structure inc. vessels, vehicles, aircraft’ s_(_)

A

Fixed, moveable, s1(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which case tells us that occupiers must keep visitors ‘reasonably safe’?

A

Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why were the Ds in Laverton v Kiapasha not liable?

A

They mopped the floor as often as possible and had installed slip resistant tiles - they had done all that was reasonable of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which section of the 57 Act covers children that are injured?

A

s2(3)(a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Taylor v Glasgow Corp. tell us about duty of care to children?

A

Occupiers are expected to guard against allurements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case shows that very young children should be supervised?

A

Platt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

s2(3)(b) states that a tradesperson is ‘expected to g___ against risks o______ i_____ to their job’

A

Guard, ordinarily incident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When can the defence in s2(4)(b) be used?

A

Where the work of an independent contractor has caused injury to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the first part of s2(4)(b)?

A

Was it reasonable to entrust the work?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in Haseldine v Dawes, and what does this case tell us?

A

A lift fell to the bottom of the shaft after maintenance by an independent contractor - the more technical the work, the more reasonable it is to entrust to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

s2(4)(b)(ii) - D must take r_____ steps to ensure the independent contractor is c_____

A

Reasonable, competent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Gwilliam say is sufficient for checking the competency of an independent contractor?

A

Asking if they are insured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When will D be less expected to check work done by an independent contractor?

A

Where the work is more technical/specialist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A ‘c____ visual i_____/e______’ may be sufficient for checking work under s4(b)(iii)

A

Cursory, inspection/examination (Woodward)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the remedies for the 57 Act?

A

Damages for personal injury and damage to property

17
Q

How is a trespasser defined in Addie v Dumbreck?

A

‘One who goes upon land without invitation… and whose presence is either unknown, or if known, is objected to’

18
Q

What does s1(1) of the 84 Act tell us? And which case can be used to illustrate this?

A

That the claim must arise from the dangerous state of the premises, not from the dangerous activities from the claimant - Keown v Coventry NHS Trust

19
Q

Which section of the 84 Act states that D must have knowledge of the danger or has reasonable grounds to believe it exists?

A

s1(3)(a)

20
Q

s1(3)(b) tells us what about when a duty is owed under the 84 Act?

A

D must know or have reasonable grounds to believe the other is in the vicinity of the danger

21
Q

What happened in Donoghue v Folkstone Properties?

A

C suffered a broken neck on a permanent grid-pile, after diving into the sea at midnight and at high tide - no duty was owed as D had no reason to believe someone would be there at that time

22
Q

s1(3)(c) of the 84 Act: ‘the risk is one which he may be e______ to provide some p_____ against’ (P____ v Northampton BC)

A

Expected, protection, (Penney v Northampton BC)

23
Q

Name two factors which are considered in discharging a duty of care under s1(4) of the 84 Act

A

Likelihood of trespass, seriousness of injury risked, cost of precautions, age of trespasser

24
Q

What does Platt v Liverpool CC tell us about reasonable care?

A

‘Occupiers should not have to guard against an irresponsible minority’

25
Q

In which section of the 84 Act can warnings be found? And what must these warnings do?

A

s1(5) - must simply have to give warning of the danger

26
Q

What cannot be claimed for under s1(8) of the 84 Act?

A

Damage to property

27
Q

What are the remedies for the 84 Act?

A

C can claim for death or personal injury

28
Q

In which case did C jump into a pool on college grounds and become paralysed?

A

Ratcliff v McConnell

29
Q

Why did the claim fail in Rhind v Astbury Waterpark?

A

The containers under the water were not known to the defendants, so the requirements of s1(3)(a) were not satisfied

30
Q

What is the difference between the requirements of warning signs in the 57 & 84 Acts?

A

84 Act states warning signs must only give warning of the danger (Tomlinson v Congleton BC), where in the 57 Act they must enable the visitor to be ‘reasonably safe’