Occupier's Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What 4 factors must be established in order for the claimant to fall within the 1957 Act?

A
  1. Establish they have suffered loss due to the state of the premises
  2. Identify the occupier
  3. Prove they are a visitor
  4. Establish that the occupier failed to take reasonable care for the visitor’s safety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What constituted an occupier?

A

Someone with a sufficient degree of control over premises

Control need not be exclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What constitutes a visitor?

A

Persons who have express or implied permission to be on the occupier’s land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the common duty of care owed by an occupier to visitors under the 1957 Act?

A

A duty to take such care as is reasonable in all the circumstances to see that the visitor is reasonably safe in using the premises for the purpose for which they are permitted to be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What factors will a court consider in establishing whether an occupier has reached the standard of a reasonably occupier?

A

Nature of danger
Purpose of visit
Seriousness of injury risked
Magnitude of risk
Cost / practicability to avoid danger
Length of time danger was on premises
Any warning of danger
Type of visitor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does the reasonable standard differ in relation to child visitors?

A

Require a higher degree of care

Where the danger constitutes an “allurement” then occupier must do even more to safeguard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does the reasonable standard differ in relation to skilled visitors?

A

Lower standard of care is expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What will the court consider in established whether a warning was adequate, and therefore complying with common duty of care?

A
  1. How specific the warning is
  2. Nature of the danger
  3. Type of visitor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Are warning notices possible to use in a defence?

A

No - only relevant to exclusion of the duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When has an occupier discharged their common duty of care in relation to independent contractors (and instead making them liable)?

A

When they have acted reasonably in entrusting the work to an independent contractor

Have taken steps to satisfy themselves of independent contractor’s competence

Have taken steps to satisfy themselves that work had been done properly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What defences are available to occupier’s liability?

A

Consent - claimant must have known precise risk that causes the injury and show by their conduct they willingly accepted the legal risk

Exclusion of liability - exclusion clause / notice to escape liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can private occupiers exclude liability for death / PI?

A

Yes, as they are not subject to UCTA or CRA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can business occupiers exclude liability for death / PI?

A

No, as they are subject to UCTA or CRA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who is the duty under the 1984 Act owed to?

A

Trespassers

People entering under an access agreement or order under the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949

People who enter land pursuant to the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000

People who exercise private rights of way over land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What would create a duty for an occupier under the 1984 Act?

A

They are aware of the danger / have reasonable grounds to believe that it exists

They know or have reasonable grounds to believe that the trespasser is in the vicinity of the danger concerned or that they may have come into the vicinity of the danger, and

They must be reasonably expected to offer the other some protection against the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the limitations of the scope for liability under the 1984 act?

A

Only concerned with liability due to state of the premises

Duty of care is only owed in respect of injury

17
Q

What is the level of duty under the 1984 Act?

A

To take such care as is reasonably in all the circumstances to see that the trespasser does not suffer injury on the premises by reason of the danger concerned

18
Q

Is a warning sufficient care in relation to trespassers?

A

Only if adequate to protect a trespasser from danger - if inadequate, occupier should put an obstacle

19
Q

What defences are available for occupiers liability under the 1984 Act?

A

Consent

Contributory negligence

20
Q

Can illegality be used as a defence under the 1984 Act?

A

No - Revill v Newbery