Occupation Flashcards

1
Q

What did Drew and Heritage argue?

A

-Different workplace talk characteristics: turn taking, goal orientation, allowable contributions, professional lexis, set structure and asymmetry.

-Developed idea that occupational speech differs to normal speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Koester argue?

A

-The importance of phatic talk in cementing social relations within the workplace

-Highlights how people within the same occupation may use less professional lexis in order to create social relations that enable people to work together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Hornyak argue?

A

-The shift from work talk to personal talk is always initiated by the highest ranking person in the room.

-Shows both asymmetry but reflects the fact that not all communication will be professional.
(links to Drew and Heritage and Koester)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Herbert and Straight argue?

A

-Compliments tend to flow from those of higher rank to those of lower rank

-Reflects power relations
(links to Hornyak)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Sinclair and Coulthard argue?

A

-How speakers ask questions, through elicitation stratergies.

-Use of the IRF structure, initiation, response and feedback.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Fairclough argue?

A

-Less/more powerful participants will create unequal encounters and asymmetry.

-More powerful put constraints on less powerful participants.
(links to Herbert and Straight, Hornyak)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s the difference between influenctial power and instrumental power?

A

Influenctial: persuaded to act in a certain way rather than forced to do.
Instrumental: enforced through law and rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe what is meant by power within/behind the discourse

A

within: carfeully persuade and influence, e.g. an advertisement use lanuage within discourse to persuade
behind: power behind law discourse, e.g. a legal letter has instrumental power behind it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Brown and Levinson argue?

A

-Politeness Theory, how people may use language to exert power over others.
-People have positive and negative face needs:
positive needs are needs to feel valued and appreciated
negative needs are not feeling imposed upon
-Aim is to acommodate others positive face needs in order to avoid face threatening acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Grice’s theory of co-operation?

A

-Maxim of Manners (be clear)
-Maxim of Relation (be relevant and contribute)
-Maxim of Quantity (be informative)
-Maxim of Quality (be truthful)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly