Occupation Flashcards

1
Q

What is an inferential framework?

A

An inferential framework is where knowledge is built up over time and used in order to understand meanings that are implicit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Drew and Heritage - Inferential Frameworks (1993)

A

members of a discourse community will share the same inferential frameworks (inferences) to make it easier to communicate swiftly.

They also believe that, in workplace conversations, there is always somebody with more authority and/or knowledge who will have more control and power in conversation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discourse communities meaning

A

Swales defined a discourse community as having members who share a common set of goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

John Swales - Discourse Community (2011) what did he believe?

A

He believed that people working in the same discourse community used specialised lexis specific to that occupation; they often share the same goals and use language to achieve those goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do you need to have to join the discourse community?

A

One must possess a required level of knowledge and skill to be considered eligible to join the community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Almut Koester - Phatic talk and Banter (2004)

A

Koester studied how employees interact within the workplace. Overall, he was a strong believer that being sociable in the workplace is essential for effective working as employees are able to support one another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Koester key findings

A

He found that ‘banter is needed in the workplace’, as it calms the atmosphere and makes customers feel more welcomed. He also decided that phatic talk (small talk) is important as workers need to establish relationships and have interactions that are not just about work related topics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Drew & Heritage

A

They suggested that members of a discourse community share inferential frameworks with each other, consisting of implicit ways of thinking, communicating and behaving.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Drew & Heritage suggest about power in the workplace?

A

They also suggested that there are strong hierarchies of power within organisations, with asymmetrical relationships marked by language use. This can lead to power asymmetry in which different communities emerge within the workplace that use different forms of language to distance themselves from one another and establish a hierarchy of power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Swales + discourse communities

What makes up a discourse community? - Swales’ defining characteristics

A

1) Has a broadly agreed set of common public goals
2) Has mechanisms of intercommunication among its members (jargon)
3) Uses it participatory mechanisms primarily to provide information and feedback
4) Utilises and hence possesses one or more genres in the communicative furtherance of its aims
5) In addition to owning genres, it has acquired some specific lexis
6) Has a threshold level of members with a suitable degree of relevant content and discoursal expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Koester and phatic talk- what is phatic talk?

A

Phatic communication is verbal or non-verbal communication that has a social function, such as to start a conversation, greet someone, or say goodbye, rather than an informative function.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Koester and phatic talk

A

Showed how important phatic talk is in getting jobs done. He recognised that workers need to establish impersonal relationships and have interactions about things that are not work related.
Suggesting social chat is an important part of effective working. Connecting with others is an important dimension in work place communications.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

David Crystal – Initialisms + Acronyms

A

Initialisms and acronyms in the workplace are linguistically economic as they get work done efficiently and quickly. Allow workers to complete goals and communicate efficiently, especially useful in high-stress, low-time occupations (e.g. doctors + MRI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dr Judith Baxter + double-voiced discourse

Background info

A

Linguistics expert Dr Judith Baxter - undertook an 18-month study into the speaking patterns of men and women at meetings in seven major well-known companies, including two in the FTSE-100

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dr Judith Baxter + double-voiced discourse

Results

A

Women were four times more likely than men to be self-deprecating, use humour and speak indirectly or apologetically when broaching difficult subjects with board members in order to avoid conflict
• These traits are all in aid of avoiding
• ‘Baxter said such language, which the study describes as “double voice discourse” (DvD), was used because women were often heavily outnumbered on boards’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Swales describe as a discourse community

A

(2011) discourse communities. A discourse community has members who: share a set of common goals, communicate internally using and ‘owning’ one or more genres, use specialist lexis and discourse, and possess a level of knowledge/skill to suitable participate in the community

17
Q

How did Drew and Heritage feel occupational talk differs to conversational talk?

A

(1992) believe institutional talk differs from ordinary conversation in various ways: goal orientation, turn-taking rules or restrictions, allowable contributions, professional lexis, structure, asymmetry

18
Q

Drew and Heritage - Inferential Frameworks and Power Relations

A

They suggest that members of a discourse community share inferential frameworks with each other. This involves implicit ways of thinking, behaving and communicating. They also suggest that there are strong hierarchies of power within organisations, with many asymmetrical power relations marked by language use

19
Q

Koester

A

(2004) - Phatic Talk. Looked at how employees can support each other in their tasks and shows how important Phatic talk is in getting jobs done. Workers need to establish interpersonal relationships and have interactions that are not just about work-related procedures. Although, some employers are represented as discouraging talk that is not strictly work-related, she shows that being personal and engaging in personal chat is an important aspect of effective working. Solidarity, the ability to connect with one’s workmates, is an important aspect of workplace communication

20
Q

Nelson

A

(2000) - Business Language. He wanted to investigate whether there was such a thing as business lexis. He found that there was a ‘semantic field for business’.
Terms had to do with : business people, companies, institutions, money, business events, places of business.
He also found that certain language did NOT appear in business contexts. Saturday and Sunday did not. There were also very few references to personal issues, house/home, family, society and personal activities

21
Q

Kim and Elder- could show jargon bad

A

Kim and Elder
(2009) - Korean Pilots. They looked at the communication difficulties experienced by Korean pilots and air-traffic staff when communicating with their American colleagues. They found that difficulties were NOT caused by poor language skills by th Koreans. Instead, the miscommunication was often due to native speakers not using the agreed phrases - instead they either abbreviated unhelpful lay, or elaborated unnecessarily and sometimes used idiomatic expressions

22
Q

Coulthard and Sinclair

A

(1975) - found that teachers use the IRF (initiation - response - feedback) model. IRF, is a pattern of discussion between the teacher and learner. The teacher initiates, the learner responds, then the teacher gives feedback

23
Q

Goffman

A

Goffman
(1955) Face Theory - FACE = a persons self-esteem and emotional needs. FACE-THREATENING ACT = a communicative act that threatens face. POSITIVE FACE = the need to feel wanted, liked and appreciated. NEGATIVE FACE = the need to have freedom of thought and action and not feel imposed on

24
Q

Brown and Levinson

A

Brown and Levinson

(1987) politeness strategies

25
Q

Lakoff

A

(2011) politeness principle - included three maxims to ensure that you won’t cause offence. 1. Don’t impose, 2. Give options, 3. Make the hearer feel good

26
Q

Herbert & Straight

A

Compliments tend to flow from those of higher rank to those of lower ranks

27
Q

Hornyak

A

The shift from work talk to personal talk is always initiated by the highest ranking person in the room

28
Q

Wenger

A

Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern ie a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly