Obtaining By Deception Or Causing Loss By Deception Flashcards
S.240(1)(b)
Obtains credit
Everyone is guilty of obtaining/causing loss by deception:
By any deception, and without claim of right:
- in incurring any debt or liability, obtains credit
S.240(1)(c)
DEMADE
Everyone is guilty of obtaining/causing loss by deception:
By any deception, and without claim of right:
- induces/causes any other person to (DEMADE) deliver over, execute, endorse, alters, destroys, make any document/thing capable of being used to derive a pecuniary advantage.
S.240(1)(d)
Everyone is guilty of obtaining/causing loss by deception:
By any deception, and without claim of right:
- causes loss to any other person
S.240(1)(a)
Everyone is guilty of obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception
Who by any deception and without claim of right
Obtains ownership or possession of or control over, any property, or any privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit or valuable consideration, directly or indirectly.
Deception Means 240(2)
(a) a false representation, whether by conduct, orally or documentary where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and
(i) knows its false in a material particular or
(ii) is reckless as to whether it is false in a material particular or
(b) an omission to disclose a material particular with intent to deceive any person, in circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it or
(c) a fraudulent device, trick or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person
Representation
Not defined, eg, representations of past, present, future fact or event or about an existing intention, opinion, belief, knowledge, state of mind.
It must be capable of being false so it must contain a proposition of fact
What do you need to prove under S240(1)
- Intent to deceive
- there was a representation by the defendant
- that representation was false
- and they knew it was false in a material particular or
- They were reckless whether it was false in a material particular
S240(2) - deception case law
R v Morely
- an intention to deceive requires that the deception is practiced in order to deceive the affected party. Purposeful intent must exist at the time of the deception.
Recklessness - Cameron v R
Recklessness is established if the defendant recognises that there is a real possibility that thier actions would bring about the proscribed result and/or that the proscribed circumstances existed.
Having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable
Intent
In the criminal law context, there are two specific types of intent, an intent to commit the act and the intent to get a specific outcome.
3 examples of intent in deception - 240(2)
- Orally - claiming to own goods that are on hire purchase
- Conduct - representing yourself as a collector for a charity by carrying an official collection bag
- Documentary - presenting a false certificate of qualification or a valueless cheque
R v Morley - Representations
representations must relate to a statement of existing fact, rather than a statement of future intention
Continuing effect of representations
Example
Word or conduct may have a continuing effect
EG: ordering dinner at a restaurant represents that you would have dinner and pay after. If during the course of dinner the diner decides to avoid that payment, the continuing representation will become false and obtaining the food will come within s.240(1)
Representation - Silence
- Silence/ non-disclosure is not a representation.
- except when an incorrect understanding is implied from a course of dealings and the defendant fails to negate that incorrect understanding.
Example - price tags on shop items, defendant knowingly allows cashier to scan the much lower price tag without telling them.
Knowledge
Knowing or correctly believing, defendant may believe something wrongly but cannot know something that is false
Knowledge can be established by…
- An admission
- Implied from the circumstances surrounding the event
- Propensity evidence
Includes - wilful blindness
False in a material particular
Am important, essential, relevant detail or item. Something important or something that matters.
Can be a minor detail.
Omission
Inaction, not acting, a conscious decision no to do something or not giving though to material at all
Duty to disclose 240(2)(b)
Requires proof that there was some material particular that was not disclosed and the defendant had a duty to disclose it, but failed to do so.
Eg a contractual relationship
Fraudulent device, trick or stratagem
- conduct must be used with intent to deceive
- covers any fraudulent conduct
- fraudulent - dishonest in a traditional moral sense
- can be a simple trick or ore complex schemes (eg pyramid schemes)
Device, trick, stratagem definitions
Device - a plan, scheme or trick
Trick - an action or scheme undertaken to fool, outwit or deceive
Stratagem - a cunning plan or scheme especially for deceiving an enemy or trickery
Without claim or right
A belief at the time of the act or omission in a proprietary or possessionary right in property relating to the alleged offence committed. The belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or any other matter of law
Obtains
Obtain or retain for themselves or any other person
Property
Real or personal property or any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, debt, electricity, anything in action, and any other right or interest.
Valuable consideration
Anything capable of having value, Money or money’s worth
Eg:
- money for goods/services
- goods for a service provided
- issuing a false invoice to receive payment for goods never supplied