Obstetrics Flashcards

1
Q

TRUFFLE
2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomized trial
The Lancet, March 2015

A

Aim to establish whether changes in fetal DV could be used as indication instead of CTG short term variation

Multi-centre, unblinded RCT

IUGR (26-32weeks, AC <10% and abnormal UAPI), singleton, EFW >500g

Delivery triggers

- Reduced STV on CTG (<3.5 <29weeks and <4 after)
- Early DV changes - >95%
- Late DV changes - reversed/absent a wave

Primary outcome - survival without cerebral palsy or neurosensory impairment

542 women

No difference in primary outcome between groups - only 48% delivered on above criteria
77% vs 84% vs 85%

Conclusion - although difference in endpoint is unchanged delivery on late changes may yield better outcomes at 2years

Strengths - RCT, multi-centre, ITT, independent review of data yearly, paeds follow-up were masked
Limitations - large LTFU, resource intensive, need fetal medicine unit so not generalizable to all, computerised CTG, large amount made it past 32weeks or delivered for other reasons (38%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

CLASP
A randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women
The Lancet, 1994

A

Aim - assess safety of LDA in pregnancy and whether LDA reduces morbidity, fetal and neonatal mortality overall and in those at high risk of IUGR or severe PET

Multicenter double blinded RCT

Participants 12-32weeks, at risk of PET or IUGR (prophylaxis) or have PET or IUGR (therapeutic)
Randomised to 60mg aspirin OD vs placebo

Outcomes - proteinuric PET, estimated pregnancy duration, BW <3%, Perinatal death secondary to PET, HTN, IUGR, maternal or neonatal bleeding from any cause

9364 randomised

12% reduction in PET (not statistically significant)
- Stronger effect if started <20weeks (still not significant)
No significant effect on IUGR, perinatal mortality

Interpretation - Aspirin should not be used routinely for PET/IUGR prevention, May have an effect in prevention if started at <20weeks, May have a stronger effect if high risk of early onset PET

Limitations - PET definition not consistent
Strengths - Good follow-up, good compliance, large cohort,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MAGPIE
Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate?
The Lancet, 2002
Magpie Trial Collaborative group

A

Aim - ascertain benefit of MgSO4 for women and babies in women with PET

International, double blind, placebo controlled, RCT

Antenatal or <24hr post-partum
PET and uncertainty about whether to use MgSO4

Primary outcomes - eclampsia, death of baby before discharge
Secondary outcomes - serious maternal morbidity, toxicity, side effects, morbidity composite

10,141 women

Reduced eclampsia by 58%, NNT 91 and 63 for severe
No difference in neonatal death
Lower maternal mortality (not statistically significant)
Side effects 24% vs 0.5%, higher abruption in those not on Mg

Conclusion - MgSO4 reduces the risk of eclampsia and likely maternal death
At this dosage, no substantive harmful effects on the mother or child, although a quarter of women will have side effects

Strengths - Intention to treat, multi centre (33), RCT, double-blinded, generalisable to large range of clinical settings, 99.7% follow-up.
Limitations - IV and IM - variable route of administration, side effects may have allowed the allocation to be guessed, eligibility dependent on attending clinicians’ beliefs about MgSO4 - unable to keep an accurate record of those eligible but not recruited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

HYPITAT
Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open label randomised controlled trial
The Lancet, 2009
Koopmans et al

A

Aim - to establish whether IOL in women with PIH or mild PET beyond 36weeks reduces severe maternal morbidity

Multicentre, open label randomised controlled trial

Singleton cephalic 36+ to 41+0 with PIH or mild PET

765 women randomised to IOL vs expectant monitoring (until 41weeks or earlier IOL if acute concerns)

Primary outcome - composite maternal morbidity

Results
IOL associated with less maternal morbidity RR 0.71 - NNT 8, fewer need for IV antihypertensives, fewer CS (not significant).
Benefit not seen in women 36-37weeks
Expectant - 50% needed IOL
Similar rates of NICU admission

Conclusion - IOL should be advised for women with PIH or mild PET from 37weeks, higher benefit achieved in women with unfavorable cervix

Strengths - Multicentre, RCT, design reflects real work practice, biological plausibility (shortens time to delivery to lessen disease progression)
Limitations - Composite outcome, open label subjects to bias, no difference in severe outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ACHOIS
Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy outcomes
NEJM, 2005
Australian carbohydrate intolerance in pregnancy study group - Crowther et al

A

Multicentre RCT

1000 women
GDM 24-34weeks and attended ANC 16-30weeks

Treatment vs non treatment of BSLs with GDM
Dietary advice, BSL testing, insulin treatment

Primary outcome - serious perinatal complication (death, shoulder dystocia, boney fracture, nerve palsy), NICU admission, jaundice needing phototherapy, IOL, CS, maternal anxiety, health status.

Outcomes - Composite serious neonatal outcome lower in intervention group - 1% vs 4%, NNT 34. Intervention group had more NICU admissions 71%vs 61% (but no increase in secondary outcomes such as hypoglycaemia requiring IV etc), higher IOL 39% vs 29%, better post-partum health survey results. No difference in CS or phototherapy. Less macrosomia 10% vs 21%.

Conclusion - Treatment of mild GDM for glycaemic control reduces the rate of serious perinatal complications without increasing the rate of caesarean section. May also improve woman’s health-related quality of life.

Strengths - Multicentre RCT
Limitations - those in routine treatment not informed of GDM result when WHO guidelines of diagnosis changed during study, routine care likely varied, outcomes all rare neonatal outcomes, not powered individually just for composite, outcomes not unique to GDM, IOL not blinded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

HAPO
Hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes
NEJM, 2008
HAPO study cooperative research group

A

Observational study, blinded to BSL result

Aim - to assess whether maternal hyperglycaemia below the threshold for overt diabetes diagnosis was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes

25,505 women

75g OGTT, stratified into 7 groups depending on levels
<5.8 fasting, <11.1 2hours

Primary outcomes - LGA >90%, primary CS, neonatal low BSL, cord blood C-peptide >90%
Secondary outcomes - delivery <37weeks, shoulder dystocia or birth injury, NICU, hyperbilirubinaemia, PET

Results - higher primary outcome with higher BSL category, higher birthweight, higher cord C-peptide level.
Secondary outcome higher too.

Conclusion - maternal BSL levels (below those for DM diagnosis at the time) have a linear association with adverse pregnancy outcomes (higher birthweight.
-> Gave ADIPS cutoffs of fasting 5.1, 1h 10, 2h 8.5 (RR 1.75 of APO)

Strengths - results generalisable as large and heterogenous population, multi-centre, double blinded, OGTT validated at single lab, adds weighting to ACHOIS study findings, biological plausibility - maternal hyperglycaemia -> fetal hyperglycaemia -> exaggerated response to insulin.
Limitations - no data on nutritional status, BMI or weight gain (confounders), mode of delivery influenced by prev GDM, BMI, prev macrosomia, participation ~50%. Statistically underpowered for rare severe outcomes (e.g. perinatal deaths, threshold effect not established, no cost analysis,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fonesca
Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study
Fonesca et al
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003

A

Aim - Evaluate the effect of prophylactic vaginal progesterone in decreasing preterm birth rate in a high risk population

RCT, double-blind
142 pregnancies
High risk singleton pregnancies - prev sPTB, prev prophylactic cerclage, uterine malformation

Progesterone 100mg PV vs placebo nocte 24-34weeks
Primary outcome - PTB <37weeks

PTB <37weeks 13.8% vs 28.5% p=0.03
PTB <34weeks 2.8% vs 18.5% p=0.002

Conclusion - Prophylactic vaginal progesterone reduced the frequency of uterine contractions and the rate of preterm delivery in women at high risk for prematurity. Beta-mimetics had higher effect in progesterone group.

Strengths - Double blinded, RCT
Limitations - Single centre, small difference in GA in average gestation of PTB, small sample size, neonatal morbidity/mortality not covered, closer care may reduce PTB in placebo group too. Didn’t analyse PPROM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fonesca 2
Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix
NEJM, 2007
Fonesca et al

A

Aim - to assess whether progesterone pessaries reduced the risk of spontaneous preterm labour before 34weeks in asymptomatic women with demonstrated cervical shortening on mid-trimester screening assessment

Multicentre, double blinded RCT
413 women randomised (24,620 scanned of 29,000 screened)

Singleton or twins, undergoing routine USS 20-25weeks
Included if cervix = 15mm

Uterogestan 200mg PV vs placebo 24-33+6weeks

Primary outcome: sPTB <34weeks

Results - 34% vs 19% sPTB (SS)

Conlcusion - benefits at-risk women, uncertai dose-response.

Limitations - not powered to detect secndary outcomes, relies on USS assessment (skill)

Strengths - mulitcemtre RCT, blinded, good adherence, high uptake of screen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TERM PROM
Induction of labour compared with expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group
NEJM 1996

A

Aim - determine whether IOL is preferable to expectant management in prelabour ROM at term

Multicentre, RCT, unblinded

5041 women
Single, cephalic, ROM >37weeks

IOL immediate with IV oxytocin vs IOL with PV prostaglandin gel vs expectant (IOL after 4 days vs PG)

Primary outcome - neonatal infection (definite or probable)
Secondary outcome - CS, women’s evaluation of treatment

Results - no difference in neonatal infection or CS
Less chorio in oxy IOL compared to expectant.
Intervention viewed more positively

Conclusion - All methods are reasonable options as no impact on neonatal infection or CS. Oxytocin IOL reduces risk of maternal infection, women view IOL as preferable to expectant management

Strengths - large RCT, international multicentre, intention to treat, comparison of IOL methods, neonatal infection data reviewers blinded.
Limitations - mothers not blinded, did not exclude lethal congenital anomaly, larger study needed to assess impact on perinatal mortality, no stratification by IOL interval (24 vs 48 vs 72h etc), no stratification by higher parity (0 vs 1+ only)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PPROMT
Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial
The Lancet, 2016
Morris, Roberts, Bowen et al

A

Immediate delivery vs expectant management with pre-term pre-labour rupture of membranes.

Multi-centre RCT
1839 assigned

Inclusion: >16years, singleton pregnancy, PPROM, 34-36+6
*can enter at 34+0 if PPROM earlier
Exclusion: established labour, chorioamnionitis, meconium

Primary outcome - neonatal sepsis
Secondary infant outcomes - composite, RDS, mechanical ventilation, NICU duration
Secondary maternal outcomes - Haemorrhage, intrapartum fever, postpartum antibiotics, mode of delivery

Results - no difference in neonatal sepsis. Immediate delivery: Higher CS, RDS, mechanical ventilation, longer NICU stay . Expectant: Higher APH, maternal ABx use

Conclusion - expectant management better as avoids prematurity complications, lower CS rate, no higher neonatal sepsis rate. Maternal observation is required due to higher risk of APH and infection.

Strengths - RCT, multi centre, assessors blinded
Limitations - 9 year study period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ORACLE I
Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, pre-labour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE 1 randomised trial
Lancet, March 2001
S J Kenyon, D J Taylor, W Tarnow-Mordi

A

Aim - to resolve the issue of whether effects of antibiotics on neonatal outcomes are variable or whether they are the consequence of biases associated with smaller studies and test whether beneficial effects reported are related to antibiotic type

Multicentre, double blinded RCT

4826 women randomised

  • Co-amoxiclav + erythromycin
  • Co-amoxiclav
  • Erythromycin
  • Placebo

Primary outcome - composite (neonatal death before DC, chronic lung disease, major cerebral abnormality on USS before DC)
Large number of secondary outcomes - time to delivery, mode of delivery, maternal ABx, birthweight, NICU admission, ventilation, RDS, surfactant, positive blood culture, NEC,

Non-significant reduction in composites both groups (not for combined vs placebo). Erythromycin assoc with prolonged gestation, less surfactant, less O2 dependence 28days, less major cerebral abnormalities on DC, less positive blood cultures.

Conclusion - Erythromycin longer latency compared to placebo, stronger effect on singletons.
Co-amoxiclauv prolongs gestation but assoc with 4x NEC

Strengths - large multi centre RCT, blinded, intention to treat, low LTFU, erythromycin cheap and widely available, suitable for penicillin allergies
Limitations - 11 unblindings included in analysis, no data on patient obstetric Hx, uncertain impacts on longterm respiratory and neurological outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ORACLE 1 -7year F/up
Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of membranes: 7-year follow-up to the ORACLE I trial
The Lancet 2008
Kenyon et al

A

Aim - Determine whether perinatal use of erythromycin and/or co-amoxiclauv for women with PROM in ORACLE I resulted in differences in functional and educational ability in childhood

Multicentre

3298 followed up (75%)

Primary outcome - any level of functional impairment form mark III MAHS classification

No difference between groups of any antibiotic

Conclusion - no evidence of substantial long term difference at 7 years following ABx for PPROM despite beneficial initial findings on neonatal outcomes

Strengths - still blinded to allocation, used validated and standardised reporting tools, 75% follow-up rate, no difference in reporting between groups
Limitations - proxy information from parents, potential for under-reporting, postal questionnaires limit follow-up, disadvantaged groups over-represented in non-responders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ACTORDS
Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome after repeat exposure to antenatal corticosteroids: a randomised controlled trial
Lancet, 2006
Crowther et al

A

RCT, blinded placebo

Establish if repeat prenatal corticosteroids given to women at risk of preterm birth can reduce neonatal morbidity without harm

982 women
<32weeks, at risk of PTB, 7+days after last dose
Singleton, twins, triplet

Betamethasone vs saline placebo
Weekly until delivery or 32weeks if remained at risk of PTB

Primary outcome - occurrence and severity of neonatal RDS, mechanical ventilation, weight/length/HC at birth and d/c.
Secondary outcome - chorio, fevers

Results - RDS 33% vs 41% 0.82 (NNT 14), less severe lung disease, less O2, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, no difference in weight/length/HC at birth or discharge.
Steroid group: Significantly higher CS birth and more minor maternal side-effects
No difference in NICU admission and duration, IVH, NEC, Chorio.

Conclusion - Repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids reduces morbidity, no short term harm. 2year follow-up: no benefit, possible higher rate of attention seeking behaviour. 6-8year follow-up: no benefit, no harm.

Strengths - RCT, multi-centre, ITT, provided with safety profile information, follow-up 2y 6-8y,

Limitations - Only studies up to 32weeks, included wide range of gestations and numbers of courses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ASTECS
Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial
BMJ 2005
Stutchfield et al

A

Multi centre pragmatic randomised trial

998 participants
Elective CS from 37weeks

Betamethasone 12mg IM x2 doses 24hours apart 48hours pre CS vs routine care

Primary outcome - admission to special care unit for treatment of respiratory distress
Secondary outcome - severity of respiratory distress and measures required to treat

Results - steroid group 24 vs 11 admissions (p=0.02). Overall 2.4% vs 5%. Less TTN in steroid group. Effect reduced with increasing gestation 5% difference 37weeks vs 1% difference 39weeks.

Conclusion - antenatal corticosteroids prior to ElCS after 37weeks reduces admission for RDS and TTN, benefits do not remain after 39weeks. Defer elective CS until 39weeks where possible.

Strengths - randomised, pragmatic (in real world scenario), multicentre, ITT analysis, biological plausibility exists, generalisable
Limitations - allocation not stratified by gestation or centre, not blinded, no placebo, did not measure fetal hypoglycaemia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ALPS
Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery
NEJM 2016
Gyamfi-Bannerman et al

A

Multicentre RCT

To assess if betamethasone given to late preterm babies reduced rate of neonatal morbidity

2832 women
34+0 to 36+5, high probability of late preterm delivery
Excluded if had prev steroids

12mg betamethasone IM x2 vs placebo

Primary outcome - neonatal composite first 72h (CPAP or high flow nasal cannula >2h, FiO2 >0.3 for 4hours, ECMO, mechanical ventilation, stillbirth, NND 72h)

Results - primary outcome 11.6% vs 14.4% (OR 0.8 NNT 35), less severe resp composite, less TTN, higher neonatal hyperglycaemia RR 1.6

Conclusion - Antenatal corticosteroids for women expected to deliver late preterm causes significantly less respiratory complications. Does increases the chances of neonatal hyperglycaemia but no other neonatal or maternal complications

Limtiations - only 60% got both doses - results not analysed separately, challenging to predict PTB, no further neonatal BSL data, no longterm follow-up

Strengths - Multicentre, RCT, ITT, consistent findings with ASTECS, adequately powered, steroid indications clinically relevant to practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

WOMAN
Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
The Lancet, 2017
WOMAN trial collaborators

A

International multi centre RCT, double-blind, placebo

Assess effects of early administration of tranexamic acid on death, hysterectomy, and other relevant outcomes in women with PPH (also included women who lost less than 500 or 1000mL but were hemodynamically unstable)

20,060 women

Ig IV TX or placebo
2nd dose repeated after 30mins or restarted in <24h

Composite primary endpoint: death from all causes or hysterectomy within 42 days of giving birth
Key secondary outcomes: death, death from bleeding
Multiple other secondary outcomes including VTE

483 deaths, 709 hysterectomies

Results - No reduction in composite primary outcome 5%.
Death due to bleeding significantly less 1.5% vs 1.9%. Reduction significant if given TXA within 3hours RR 0.69. No reduction in hysterectomy, reduction in laparotomy, no adverse events from TXA incl VTE.

Conclusion - TXA reduces death due to bleeding with no adverse effects. Give as soon as possible after bleeding onset

Strengths - large numbers, RCT, double blinded, very few LTFU,

Limitations - no specification of level of care at hospitals, was not stratified for this either - unsure re generalisability in high income country. Much higher all-cause mortality than high income countries (and >25% were not due to bleeding). Rx delivery after randomisation was likely delayed so not showing a difference for some outcomes (RBCs, hysterectomy likely being done at the same time).

17
Q

MgSO4 NEUROPROTECTION
Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus: Intervention review
Cochrane 2009
Doyle et al

A

Meta-analysis

To assess the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulphate as a neuroprotective agent when given to women considered at risk of pre-term birth

5 RCTs of antenatal MgSO4 in women at risk of PTB <37weeks
4 specifically PTB, 1 (MAGPIE) for PET
6145 babies

Primary outcome - infant mortality, cerebral palsy (and combined), major maternal outcomes
Secondary outcome - cessation of therapy, other paediatric and maternal outcomes

Results - statistically significant reduction in cerebral palsy RR 0.68 (NNT 63), less substantial gross motor dysfunction.
No difference in neonatal mortality. No severe maternal outcomes. Significantly more women ceased therapy due to side effects RR 3.26

Conclusions - antenatal MgSO4 for women at risk of preterm birth particularly <34weeks provides fetal neuroprotection and reduces the risk of cerebral palsy, no harms with respect to mortality.

Strengths - meta-analysis of RCT, large numbers assessed, only one study in developing country - generaliseable

Limitations - only 2 studies looked at 2year outcomes, diverse protocols and indications included, cerebral palsy is not always diagnosed <2years old, possible diluted benefit as included up to 37weeks, resource and cost assoc with MgSO4 for all <34weeks - Aus/NZ guideline recommends <30weeks,

18
Q

TWINS
A randomized trial of planned caesarean section or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy
NEJM 2013
Barrett et al

A

Multicentre RCT

Aim - Compare risk of fetal or neonatal death or serious morbidity between planned CS or planned VB with CS only if indicated for twin pregnancies 32+0 to 38+6 weeks, if leading twin cephalic

ElCS vs IOL 37+5-38+6

2804 women
DCDA and MCDA pregnancies

Primary outcome - composite of fetal or neonatal mortality, serious neonatal morbidity.
Other outcome - compsite of maternal mortality and serious morbidity
Secondary outcome - death or neurodevelopment impairment at 2years

Results - Planned VB 4.2% CS 2nd twin, 39.6% CS for both.
No difference in primary outcome (2.2% vs 1.9%) or maternal outcomes. Poorer outcome for 2nd twin but unchanged between groups.
2year follow up 70% - no difference.
Chronicity doesn’t affect outcome.
Almost half were born pre-term

Conclusion - CS for twin delivery (leading twin cephalic in absence of vaginal delivery contraindications) does not add any benefits.

Strengths - international multicentre, RCT, ITT analysis (even still delivered 2nd twin by CS despite twin 1 VB), high numbers, included DCDA and MCDA, included spontaneous preterm birth

Limitations - Subgroup analyses not powered to detect those differences, only generalisable in centres where CS can happen within 30mins and senior obstetrician at delivery, 61% mutliparous so may be less generalisable in primps. Included a small amount undiagnosed MCMA. Didn’t compare IOL vs CS.

19
Q

ARRIVE
Labour induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women
NEJM 2019
Grobman et al

A

Multicentre RCT
6106 women low-risk nulliparous, no indication for earlier delivery

IOL 39weeks vs expectant management
IOL as per centre protocol - not prescribed

Primary outcome - composite = perinatal death, severe morbidity - resp support <72hours PP, APGAR <3 at 5mins, HIE, seizure, infection, meconium aspiration, birth trauma, ICH or subgaleal haemorrhage, hypotension needing vasopressors.
Secondary outcome - CS rate

Results - Primary outcome 4.3% IOL vs 5.4% expectant - not statistically significant. RR 0.8 with CI 0.64-1.0. Suggests up to 36% less morbidity.
CS rate 18.6% vs 22.2% (p <0.001). NNT 28. Results remain unchanged when stratified by bishop score. Less hypertensive disorders.
Lower CS rate 18.6% vs 22.2% RR 0.83.
Higher maternal satisfaction - significant but small difference.

Conclusions - IOL at 39weeks in low risk nulliparous women is not associated with higher neonatal morbidity overall, reduces CS rate.

Strengths - large study, RCT, multi-centre, ITT analysis, stratified by Bishop score.

Limitations - cannot generalise to other groups, generalisability overall uncertain - (university centres, tertiary hospitals, obstetricians care providers), may not be applicable to all systems due to limitations on resources (no cost-effect analysis), non-masked - subject to bias, not powered to detect differences in rare outcomes

20
Q

TERM BREECH
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial
The Lancet, 2000
Hannah et al

A

International multicentre RCT

Aim - Compare vaginal delivery vs elective caesarean section for breech presentation

2088
Women with single breech at 37weeks - extended or frank

Vaginal birth vs ElCS from 38weeks
IOL allowed for standard indications

Excluded - fetal neck hyperextension, EFW >4000g, mechanical anomaly, contraindication to labour,

Primary outcome - perinatal/neonatal mortality <28days, serious neonatal morbidity, maternal mortality or serious morbidity <6weeks

Results - 90% planned CS had CS. 56% planned VB had VB.
Neonatal composite 1.6% CS vs 5% VB (RR 0.33)
No difference in maternal outcomes
Significant interaction between treatment group and country’s perinatal mortality rate - larger risk reduction in lower mortality rate setting.

Conclusion - Planned caesarean section is preferred over planned vaginal birth for the term fetus in breech position to reduce fetal risks. NNT 14. serious maternal complications are similar between the groups.

Strengths - RCT, multicentre (international), ITT analysis, large numbers, adequately powered, interim analyses halted trial early when apparent effect already seen,

Limitations - MANY

  • 56% VB rate achieved
  • Large amount recruited in active labour
  • Mixed participation, majority LMIC, variety of care standards. Makes generalisation very difficult
  • Lack of attendance of experiened clinicians in 32% planned VBs (this group had higher neonatal M&M so likely skews results
  • Lack of adherence to exclusion criteria (incl IUGR, some twins, not all had fetal neck hyperextension excluded, IUFD in 2x cases)
  • Those ineligible after randomisation not excluded
  • Inadequate intra- and antepartum assessment (not all had CTG)
  • Prolonged 2nd stage was allowed in some cases
  • Allowed IOL
  • Only 2/3 of centres able to provide EmCS in <60minutes
  • Birth weight >4000g over-represented in VB group
  • Only borderline difference in results if CS performed in labour
  • Most cases of mortality were not attributed to labour
  • Benefit in CS group may be attributed to delivery at earlier gestation so inherent lower risk of stillbirth
  • Short term morbidity did not translate to long term morbidity at 2years of age
  • Many women recruited in labour - raises questions about the ethics in informed consent
  • Retrospective trials from some of the countries included in the trial don’t confirm morbidity and mortality data from TBt, provided that stringent criteria for breech delivery are applied for vaginal breech delivery
  • has resulted in many more ElCS for term breech presentations, leading to lack of skill and experience which is a paramount factor in managing vaginal births safely.