Obstetric Flashcards

1
Q

ACHoiS - (Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women)

A

Aim: to assess whether GDM is associated with adverse fetal outcomes
Method: 1000 women, 24-34 w GDM
Tx: dietary advice, BG monitoring, insulin tx, or routine care
Outcome: perinatal complications, NICU admit, Jaundice w photo, IOL, C/S, mat anxiety and depression

Results: serious complications lower in intervention group; more likely to go to NICU w intervention
Similar NVD v CS
Lower rates depression and better health status in intervention group 3/12 PP
**reduced serious adverse perinatal outcomes from 4.4% to 1.4%
Less PET

Strengths: randomized, Aussie
Weakness: IOL and NICU related tx decisions/ not blinded; Ethical concerns- women not informed of GDM despite WHO criteria changing during study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DIGITAT- disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term

A

Aim: compare effect of IOL vs expectant Mx for IUGR at term
2004-4008, Netherlands, intention to treat analysis
Inclusion criteria: singleton, cephalon, 36-41/40, suspected FGR: AC<10 or EFW<10th
Primary outcome: adverse neonatal outcome (death, apgar < 7 at 5 minutes, ph<7, NICU admit
Results: IOL group delivered 10 days earlier and weighed 130 g less, no statistical significant difference for primary outcome

IOL not associated with increased op/instrumental del
can have expectant Mx with intensive fetal monitoring if desired
Still rational to choose IOL to prevent possible neonatal morbidity and SB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cochrane: fetal and umbilical Doppler USS in high-risk pregnancies (2017)

A

Obj: asssess effects of Doppler in high-risk preg on Obs care and fetal outcomes
Selection: randomizes and quasi-randomizes CT of Doppler USS vs none in high-risk pregnancies
Results:DV in early FGR showed improvement in neurological outcomes, assess UA PI - fewer perinatal deaths and fewer obstetric interventions
Limitations: hard to assess bias, evidence not high qualaity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

TRUFFLE study (2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcome)

A

Aim: assess whether changes in DV to be used as indication for del over CTG short term variation
Method: multi Centre, unblinded, randomized
Singleton 26-32 with early onset growth restriction and an abnormal UAPI; three groups reduced CTG STV, early DV changes (pulsatility >95th) or late DV changes (absent or reversed a wave)
Primary outcome: survival without CP or neurosensoy impairment
Results: 542 women, more free of neuroimpairment in late dv change group at 2 years of age; No difference in the proportion of infants surviving without neuroimpairment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ACTORDS - neonatal RDS after repeat exposure to antenatal corticosteroids

A

RCT 2006
1000 women at risk of PTB <32/40, initial steroids >7/7 previously
Do repeated doses do harm?
Excluded infection, second stage labour
Randomized to placebo or single dose beta given weekly while undelivered and <32/40
Primary outcome: freq and severity RDS, BW
secondary outcome: chorio, fevers

Results: No sig difference SB, NND, chorio; less o2 requirements, shorter mech vent, less RDS, less lung disease
Conclusion: reduces morbidity
Weakness: no long term follow up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ALPS- steroids for late pre-term

A

Multi Centre, RCT
Singles 34-36+5 HR for delivery during late preterm period
2 injections of betamethasone or placebo 24 hours apart
Primary outcome:neonatal treatment in first 72 hours (CPAP, O2, mech ventilation) or stillbirth or neonatal death

Results: Reduced rate of neonatal respiratory complications. No significant between group differences; hypoglycemia more common in the betamethasone group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ASTECS- steroids for term elcs

A

Multi Centre randomized trial
Treatment group had 2 x doses betamethasone, other group: routine care
Section performed prior to 39 weeks

Primary outcome: admission to NICU with respiratory distress
Secondary: severity of respiratory distress and level of care

Results: halved the amounts of those admitted to nicu and those with TTN in group given antenatal corticosteroids; reduced RDS from 1.1% to 0.2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ORACLE 1: Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with PPROM: 7 year f/u

A

Lancet 2008
Questionnaire at age 7 to assess childs’s health status

Results: No difference after erythromycin with or without augmentin compared to no erythromycin. Same for augmentin.
No effect on behavior

Weaknesses
Confounded: children with unknown outcomes from lower SES
Questionnaire assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

***ORACLE1: Broad spectrum Abx for PPROM

A

Lancet 2001
RCT, double blind, multicentre
Erythromycin, augmentin, both or placebo
Primary outcome: NND, chronic lung disease, major cerebral abnormality on USS
Secondary: time to del, use of surfactant and O2, maternal infection and abx requirement

Results:
Erythromycin: prolonged pregnancy, reduced surfactant and o2, few major cerebral abnormalities on USS, fewer + blood cultures
No difference death, mode of delivery, birthweight, NICU admission
Augmentin alone and augmentin + erythromycin did prolong pregnancy and reduce postnatal abx but 4x risk of NEC

Strength: large multicentre double blind RCT, high f/u
Weakness: no long term outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

WOMAN trial

A

Randomized double blind placebo
1g TXA vs placebo
Multicentre, 20000 women

Results:
Rr.081 in mortality
No adverse effects
Give within 3hrs RR0.69
Reduces risk of bleeding to death by 1/3 
Did not prevent hysterectomy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Term PROM IOL vs expectant

A

1996
5041 women
Randomized
IOL with IV oxy, prostaglandin, or expectant management up to 4 days

Primary outcome:neonatal infection
Secondary: caeser, women’s evaluations of their treatment

No difference in neonatal infection
Less likely to develop chorio if had IOL
Similar rates of caeser
Lower rate of maternal infection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

IOL vs monitoring post dates

A

Randomly assigned
3407 women
IOL or have monitoring until spontaneous labour

Lower rate of caeser in IOL group
No difference in perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MIG trial

A

RCT 2008
10 Centre’s 740 women
Randomized to have metformin with insulin if required or insulin alone
Non-blinded.
Primary outcomes: neonatal hypoglycemia, prematurity, RDS, birth trauma, phototherapy, apgar <7 at 5 minutes
Secondary outcomes: neonatal anthropometric measurements, maternal HTN, glycaemic control, postpartum glucose tolerance, maternal acceptability of treatment
Results: No significant differences, patients happier to have metformin compared to insulin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hapo 2008

A
25000 women
OGTT 2 hr at 24 and 32 weeks
Blinded
To assess what degree of hyperglycaemia on OGTT is associated with adverse fetal outcome
Multicentre observational study
Adverse outcomes in GDM pregnancy:
Macrosomia 27% vs 5.4%
Shoulder dystocia/birth injury
NICU admission
Need for phototherapy
Cord blood c-peptide >90%ile 32% vs 2.7%
Neonatal hypoglycaemia 4.6% 2x
Primary caeser 32% vs 16%
PET
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Clasp: a randomized trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of PET

A

RCT, multicentre, double blind
12-32/40
Randomized to 60mg aspirin daily or placebo
Women at risk of PET or IUGR with signs or symptoms of PET or IUGR in current pregnancy
No stat sig
No difference if had >20/40
Reduced prem delivery
No increase in PPH
Trend towards reduction in PET, SB and NND with preterm delivery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Magpie trial

A

2002
Multicentre
10141 women
Mag or placebo if not given birth or <24 PP with BP >140/90 and proteinuria 1+
Primary outcomes: eclampsia and death of baby

58% lower risk of eclampsia
Lower maternal mortality
No difference in baby risk of dying
Increased abruption in those not on mag
NNT 91
17
Q

Fonesca - prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce preterm birth in women at increased risk

A

RCT, double blind
2003
142 hr singleton
100mg PV progesterone vs placebo
Include: previous PTB, cerclage, congenital uterine malformation
Didn’t analyze PPROM or iatrogenic preterm delivery
Reduction in preterm birth in progesterone group (28.5% vs 13.8% prog) also reduction in PTB <34 weeks
Beta agonists for treatment of PTL more effective in progesterone group
Reduction in UA also

18
Q

Mag sulp for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus

A

2009
Cochrane systematic review

Primary aim: prevent neurological abnormalities in the unborn fetus
Secondary outcome: long term neurological outcome

No overall effect on paediatric mortality
Reduction in CP 0.71 RR
Less babies with gross motor dysfunction
No diff to mum

19
Q

Landon study - effects of Rx of mild GDM

A

Aim: to assess whether mild GDM is associated with adverse fetal outcomes
Multicentre
Included if after 3hr 100g GTT had BSL <5.3mmlol but 2 or 3 post-load BGLs were elevated
958 women

Primary outcome:rates not different between groups
(SB, neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia, hypoglycaemia, hyperinsulinaemia, or birth trauma)

Reduction in secondary outcomes : LGA, shoulder dystocia, CS, HTN in preg

20
Q

Fonesca - progesterone and risk of PTB among women with a short cervix

A

NEJM 2007
Evaluate effectiveness of progesterone administration for those with asymptomatic mid-trimester short cervix
Singleton or twin 20-25/40 wi =15mm cervix
Utrageston or placebo
Reduction in PTB from 34.4% to 19.2% (del <34/40)
No diff in secondary outcomes (baby complications)

Short cervix accounts for less than 1/3 total PTB number (limitation)

21
Q

Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk of late preterm delivery

A

NEJM 2016
Steroids between 34-36+5 and high probability of delivery in late preterm (dilated, SROM, expected IOL or CS)
Primary outcome: resp support or stillbirth 72h after delivery
Secondary: RDS, TTn Sonora, IVH, NEC, sepsis
2831 RCT

Results: No death
NNT 35 for primary outcome
NNT 25 for secondary outcomes (resp)increased risk neonatal hypoglycaemia; no difference for NEC, sepsis, IVH

Only 60% received both doses

22
Q

Term breech trial

A

Lancet 2000
Compare planned c/s vs planned vaginal
>37 frank or complete
Excluded: CPD, >4kg, fetal anomaly, hyperextended head
Primary: neonatal mortality,SDH, ICH, spinal cord injury, skull #, nerve injury, seizures, low apgars, BE <15, Nicu >4 days
Secondary: maternal stuff
2000 RCT
Lower rate mortality/morbidity in ELCS; no diff to mum

Some improved outcomes related to absence of labour and elective early delivery

NNT 14 for neonatal morbidity or mortality

Violated protocols: some footling, some babies already dead
Some deaths had nothing to do with mode of delivery

23
Q

ORACLE II- broad-spectrum abx for spontaneous preterm labour

A

Lancet 2001
Include: <37 weeks, preterm labour with intact membranes
Primary: neonatal death or major adverse outcome
Secondary: delivery timeframe, mode, hospital, NICU admit, GA at del, RDS
1600 RCT
Augmentin, erythro, or both, or placebo QID for 10/7 or until delivery

No abx prolonged pregnancy
Essentially no difference

24
Q

Hypitat - IOL vs expectant for GHTN or mild PET after 36

A

Multicentre RCT
Lancet 2009
36-41 weeks with DBP>95
Primary outcomes: death, morbidity, pph, progression to severe disease
Secondary: mode del, neonatal morbidity and mortality
756 randomizes
RR0.64 intervention compared to expectant
No diff in secondary outcomes
NNT 8

IOL abided for HTN and mild pET >37 weeks

25
Q

PPROMT trial (PPROM immediate delivery vs expectant close to term)

A

Multicentre RCT 2016 (1839 women)
PPROM between 34-36+6 w no signs of infection included
Primary outcome: neonatal sepsis
Secondary: composite neonatal morbidity and mortality indicator (sepsis, mech vent >24hr, SB, NND), RDS, mech ventilation, NICU stay, Mat: APH, fever, abx PP, Mode of del

No difference in primary outcome or composite secondary outcome; Increased RDS, mech vent, time in NICU
Mat outcomes: lower CS rate, higher APH, fever, PP abx

26
Q

AFFIRM

A

Look it up