Obstacles to International Cooperation Flashcards
obstacles to international cooperation and agreement
the tragedy of the commons explains in part why international cooperation and agreement on the environment is difficult to achieve
but there are various other obstacles in the way of international cooperation including…
- sovereignty
- disagreements between developed and developing states
- climate change denial
- unequal climate change
- the reluctance of the biggest contributors to sign up
sovereignty
on most issues, such as health care, education, law and order and immigration, states enjoy sovereignty and have the ultimate authority to decide policy in these areas
however, the environment is not confined within state borders – pollution, rising sea levels and greenhouse gas emissions cannot be solved by unilateral action, they require the collective action of many states, if not all
collective action requires collective decision making and collective implementation, which in turn leads to the creation of international organisations and regimes to aid this process
inevitably, this leads to a loss of sovereignty as decisions are made more easily by a majority rather than on the basis of unanimity and there will be times when individual states lose out in the interests of the majority, having to accept the majority decision despite disagreeing
disagreements between developed and developing states
what do they disagree on?
there are disputes about how far nations are responsible or should take action over environmental issues and divisions between developed and developing states
the disagreements over responsibility for climate change provide another significant obstacle to international co-operation and agreement on the environment
disagreements between developed and developing states
what does scientific evidence suggest?
the scientific evidence suggests that global warming is caused by greenhouse gases, which are the by-products of burning fossil fuels
disagreements between developed and developing states
when did the consumption of fossil fuels begin?
the consumption of fossil fuels began in earnest in the late-18th century with the Industrial Revolution
countries industrialised at different rates and some countries in the developing world are still industrialising
but the developed states were the earliest to industrialise, and they produce a greater share of greenhouse gases
disagreements between developed and developing states
USA v China (carbon dioxide emissions)
for example, in the 1990s, the USA produced about 25% of the world’s total carbon-dioxide emissions compared to China’s 14%
despite the fact that the American population accounted for less than 5% of the total world population, while China’s accounted for 20%
disagreements between developed and developing states
how are developed states responsible for emissions in the developing world?
furthermore, developed states are also responsible for much of the emissions in the developing world
due to globalisation, around one-third of carbon dioxide emissions in the developing world come from the manufacturing of goods that are consumed in the developed world
therefore, it would seem right that developed states should bear greater responsibility for the reduction in carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide levels, especially when they have had longer to enjoy the benefits of industrialisation
disagreements between developed and developing states
why else should developed states bear more responsibility for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, aside from the fact that they’ve produced more?
any requirement for developing states to reduce emissions would jeopardise their much-needed economic growth
in recognition of such concerns about equity and fairness, the principle of ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ was enshrined in the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change
this places the responsibility on developed states to commit to greater reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions and to provide financial support to developing states to help them achieve reductions
disagreements between developed and developing states
why is the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities highly contentious?
the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities is highly contentious and developed states argue that they cannot be held responsible for pollution produced in the past, when no one knew this would cause global warming
they argue that reduction targets should be set according to current rather than historical levels of emissions
there are clear disagreements about how pollution should be measured – for example, whether current or cumulative levels should count
disagreements between developed and developing states
what else do developed states take issue with?
they also take issue with the linking of emissions to a state’s share of the global population
America may produce four times more greenhouse gas emissions per capita than China, but overall China is now producing the highest levels of emissions: 29% to America’s 16%
successive US administrations have disputed the fairness of targets based on per-capita measures, claiming that targeting the highest polluters would do more to combat climate change
climate change denial
what is climate change denial? what do they claim?
climate change denial is a less tangible obstacle to agreement on tackling climate change, but nonetheless a factor that causes states to be reluctant in taking effective action
there is a significant lobby, especially in the USA, that challenges the science of climate change
the fossil fuel industry and right wing libertarian think tanks sponsor scientists who question the role of human beings in global warming, the quality of the science and the seriousness of the threat of climate change
for example, they claim that current rising temperatures are due to natural variation, or that water vapour is a more important cause of global warming which is not accounted for in many models of climate change
climate change denial
how has climate change denial affected public opinion?
it is hard to say whether such groups have reduced governments’ ability to agree on what to do, but they may have influenced public opinion
in the UK, less than 1% of voters consider the environment among the most important issues facing the country, if voters do not prioritise global warming there is less impetus for governments to act
also, action on the environment might mean higher taxes or more restrictions on citizens, which would reduce their standard of living and freedom of action
unequal climate change
impact of climate change in the northern hemisphere
a further complication in agreeing binding targets is that climate change does not affect all parts of the world equally
generally, the northern hemisphere has been only mildly affected by more extreme weather events, such as flooding and storms, thought to be caused by warming temperatures
unequal climate change
impact of climate change in the Arctic
the ice is retreating quickly in the Arctic, increasing the challenges for polar bears in hunting for food, as a sparsely populated area this has little impact on human societies
unequal climate change
impact of climate change in the southern hemisphere
equatorial regions and the southern hemisphere are more populated and seem to be bearing the brunt of climate change
the increasing incidence of drought in East Africa, the expansion of the Sahara and Namibian deserts, and the threat of rising sea levels to low-lying islands in the Pacific and river deltas in places such as Bangladesh may make such places uninhabitable in the future
for islands such as the Maldives, Nauru, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, urgent action on climate change is a matter of national survival
the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) is lobbying for the more ambitious target of limiting the rise in global mean temperatures to just 1.5°C, rather than the 2°C accepted by most other states