Observations Flashcards
What are observations
- provide a psychologist with a way of seeing what people do without having to ask them
- allow researchers to study observable behaviour within a natural/controlled setting
- allows researcher to study more complex interactions between variables in a more natural way
Types of observations - naturalistic/controlled
Naturalistic -
- observed in their everyday natural setting
- target behaviour is naturally occurring
✅ high external validity as findings can be generalised to everyday life
❌ lack of control over situation making replication difficult
❌ may be uncontrolled extraneous variable
Controlled -
- observations take place where some variables are controlled and manipulated by the experimenter
✅ extraneous variables are less of a factor therefore replication is easier
❌ findings cannot be readily applied to real life settings
Types of observations - covert/overt
Covert -
- type of observational study where the participants are not fully aware they are being studied
- behaviour must be public and happening anyway to be ethical
✅ particants don’t know they are being watched so removed participant reactivity and ensures behaviour is natural increasing validity
❌ ethics may be questioned as people in public may not wish so have their behaviours noted down
Overt -
- observer in view of participants and are aware they are being observed
- have given informed consent
✅ more ethically acceptable
❌ know they are being observed so may have a significant influence in their behaviour
Types of observations - participant/non-participant
Participant -
- researcher also a participant in activity they are observing
✅ researcher can experience the situation as participants do giving them increased insight into lives of people being studied increasing validity
❌ danger researcher may come to identify too strongly with those they are studying and lose objectivity
Non-participant -
- researcher does not join in
- records behaviour in a more objective manner
✅ allows researcher to maintain an objective psychological distance
❌ As the researcher is apart from what they are observing it is possible that they could misinterpret some behaviours
Observational design - structured
- observing a few specific, clearly defined behaviours eg dropping litter or using a bin etc
- large samples in busy environments where many different behaviours are likely to occur
- emphasis on quantitative behaviour
✅ quantitative data quick to analyse
✅ using predetermined categories means researcher cannot become unfocused
❌ doesn’t sat why it occurred
❌ using predetermined means unable to include other relevant things limiting how useful
Observational design - unstructured
- researcher writing down everything they see
- small scale observations involving a few participants
- emphasis on qualitative
✅ in detail, highly subjective data high in ecological validity
✅ focuses in unique experiences so good to use in case studies
❌ analysing data is time consuming
Observational design - behavioural categories
- Target behaviour should be precisely defined and made observable and measurable e.g. target behaviour of affection may be broken down into hugging, kissing, holding hands etc
✅ using clearly to find categories enables researcher to achieve an objective view of what is being observed
✅ use of more than one observer should ensure inter observer reliability
❌ predetermined categories may be limiting meaning research is not truly represent what occurred lowering validity
Observational design - sampling methods: event sampling
- involves counting the number of times a particular behaviour (the event) occurs in a target population
✅ your specific behaviours won’t be overlooked
❌ if too many of the specific behaviours occur at once it is too difficult to capture them all limiting validity
Observational design - sampling methods: time sampling
- Record all behaviour during a set timeframe at a set point e.g. every three hours for 15 minutes
✅ reduces number of observations needing to be made
✅ offers researchers flexibility in what they record
❌ can miss any behaviour occur outside set timeframe limiting validity
Inter-observer reliability
- using two or more researchers helps to reduce bias however these researchers must be consistent in their observations
- Use it to compare the ratings of two or more observers and check for agreement in measurements
- Refers to extent of which different observers are able to observe and write the same behaviour in the same way
- Observers must be trained to establish inter-observer reliability: observer should familiarise themselves with their behavioural categories and ensure fully operationalised, observed behaviour at the same time, compare their data and discuss any differences etc