Objective Mastery Flashcards
Personal jurisdiction requires that the defendant be ________ to the forum state’s
jurisdiction, and that the defendant be _______________.
amenable; served with proper notice
Amenability to personal jurisdiction is governed by the ____________ , subject
to the limits of the _____________ of the United States Constitution.
forum state’s law; due process clause
Pennoyer v. Neff described three bases for state jurisdiction over persons and
things. They are: a.___________: jurisdiction over the person
b. _______: jurisdiction over interests in property
c. _____________: jurisdiction over seized property, where plaintiff’s claim is
unrelated to the seized property.
Note that quasi in rem jurisdiction is arguably unconstitutional after Shaffer
v. Heitner.
a. In personam
b. In rem
c. Quasi in rem
Pennoyer based its jurisdictional formula on ________ over persons and property
within its borders.
state power
Under Pennoyer’s in personam jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor
—would be _______ in all states
—for the _________ of damages
—may be ______________ until fully collected
binding
full amount
enforced repeatedly
Under Pennoyer’s in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in favor of plaintiff
—affects ______________ in a res (both ____ and __________ to the lawsuit)
—does not result in a ______________
— does not require ____________ outside the forum
everyone’s interests
parties; nonparties
money judgment
enforcement
Under Pennoyer’s quasi in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor:
—entitles plaintiff to the _________________
—is not a ____________________
—is not ____________________________
—may not be enforced __________________
—may not be enforced __________________
property attached for jurisdiction personal judgment enforceable against any other property more than once outside the forum
Another type of jurisdiction not discussed in Pennoyer is ______, which involves the
state’s authority to adjudicate such matters as divorce, adoption, citizenship and
mental competence.
status
__________________________ altered Pennoyer’s rule for personal
jurisdiction, replacing the concept of ___________ with the new standards of
_____________ and ________ provided by the “minimum contacts test.”
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
state power
reasonableness
fairness
The current test for amenability, following International Shoe and other cases,
does not require the minimum contacts test if the defendant satisfies any one of the
four “traditional” bases for in personam jurisdiction. Those bases are:
_________ in the forum state
_________ to jurisdiction
________ of objection to jurisdiction
______________ in the forum when served
Residence
Consent
Waiver
Physical presence
Consent to jurisdiction has two forms, _______ consent and ________ consent. _________________ are an example of express consent, and __________________ are an example of implied consent.
express
implied
Forum selection clauses
non-resident motorists statutes
If none of the traditional bases are present, a state may only exercise in personam
jurisdiction over defendants who have minimum contacts with the state. The two
categories of minimum contacts are _________________ and __________________.
specific jurisdiction
general jurisdiction
__________________ is where the lawsuit arises from or relates to the nonresident
defendant’s contacts with the forum state. _______________________ is where the lawsuit is unrelated to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state.
Specific jurisdiction
General jurisdiction
Specific jurisdiction has four contacts tests, which are that the defendant
a. __________________ itself of the benefits and protections of forum law;
b. should have __________ that its activity would subject it to jurisdiction in the
forum state;
c. could __________________ being haled into court in the forum state;
d. placed its product in the __________________ and could foresee that it would be used in the forum state.
purposefully availed
foreseen
reasonably anticipate
stream of commerce
General jurisdiction has one contact test, which is that it has __________________ with the forum state.
continuous and
systematic contacts
If the defendant has no contacts with the forum (and does not meet one of the four
traditional bases of jurisdiction), then there is _______________________ over that
defendant. If, on the other hand, defendant does have specific or general contacts,
then the court must consider the ______________________. This is a
balancing test with five factors, which are:
—______________________
—____________ interest in convenient and effective relief
—__________________________
—the ______________________ in furthering fundamental social policies
—the ___________________ in effective resolution of controversies
no personal jurisdiction fair play and substantial justice test burden on the defendant plaintiff's the forum state’s interest shared interests of several states judicial system’s interest
The due process requirement for notice to defendant is stated in Mullane v. Central
Hanover. Notice is constitutionally sufficient if it is “__________________, under
all circumstances, to apprise _________ parties of the pendency of the action, and
afford them an _________________ and _____________________.”
reasonably calculated
interested
opportunity to appear
present objections
An abbreviated version of the Mullane notice rule is that __________ requires
notice and an _____________________.
due process
opportunity to be heard
Which rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure deals with initially notifying
the defendant of the lawsuit? _______
Rule 4
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, the two primary methods for service of process on a
competent adult are:
a. ___________________ to defendant;
b. leaving copies at _________________ with a person of _____________________.
personal delivery
defendant’s residence
suitable age and discretion
In most cases, the federal method of service on defendants outside the district is by
the _________ statute of the state in which the federal court sits.
long arm
The purposes of venue rules are:
(a) __________ to defendant
(b) _______________ of caseload within the forum state
fairness
geographic allocation
The federal statute for general venue provisions is _______________.
28 U.S.C. 1391
The purpose of forum non conveniens is to move _____________________
based on fairness and convenience.
cases from one forum to another
Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to adjudicate based on the
type of case and in some cases, _____________________________.
the dollar amount in controversy
Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over two types of cases:
—_____________
—___________________
federal question
diversity of citizenship
The statute dealing with general federal question jurisdiction is _____________.
It provides that federal courts have jurisdiction over any _____________________________________ of the United States.
28 U.S.C. § 1331
case or controversy arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties
In addition to the general federal question provisions in 28 U.S.C. § 1331, there are
specific statutes on federal question jurisdiction, including actions against (name
three): ________, __________, _________
foreign states, admiralty, patents, civil rights, consuls, internal revenue, and
United States as plaintiff or defendant
Diversity jurisdiction is covered by ___________. That statute provides that
federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over claims between _________________, or between _____________ and _____________, where the amount in
controversy _________________.
28 U.S.C. § 1332 citizens of different states state citizens foreign citizens exceeds $75,000
Although the Constitution requires only ______ diversity, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires
_________ diversity. This means that all plaintiffs must have different citizenship
than all defendants.
partial
complete
For diversity purposes, a corporation has two citizenships, which are:
a. ___________________
b. ______________________
state of incorporation
principal place of business
For diversity purposes, partnerships have the citizenship of _______________.
all the partners
The amount in controversy is determined by plaintiff’s ________________.
good faith pleading
In achieving the amount in controversy, may Plaintiff aggregate (answer “yes” or
“no”):
a. all of Plaintiff’s claims against one defendant? _____
b. alternate theories of recovery for the same wrong? _____
c. claims of different plaintiffs? _____
d. claims against different defendants? ____
Yes
No
No
No
In some cases, a related claim that lacks diversity or federal question jurisdiction
may be included. This is called ______________.
supplemental jurisdiction
Federal courts traditionally abstain from ___________, _________ and __________________.
family law
probate
state criminal proceedings
If plaintiff has filed his action in state court, and jurisdiction is proper in federal
court, defendant may remove the case to federal court. This is done by filing a
________________ in federal court, attaching a copy of ___________________
and _____________ to the state court and all parties.
Notice of Removal
all state court pleadings
giving notice
If there is a ___________ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court no matter when the objection is made.
jurisdictional
If there is a __________ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court if a ______________________.
procedural
proper and timely objection is filed
State court subject matter jurisdiction is governed by____________.
state law
In state courts, subject matter jurisdiction is designated by ___________ and/or
________________.
type of case
dollar amount
In Texas, state district courts have ______________ over all claims of ______ or more in controversy.
general jurisdiction
$500
Federal courts have ___________ jurisdiction over patent claims. Federal and state court share ____________ jurisdiction over _____________________.
exclusive
concurrent
federal civil rights actions
A court has ___________ jurisdiction if it is the required forum at the beginning of the
case. A court has _____________ jurisdiction if it may adjudicate a case only after it has been heard in a lower court.
original
appellate
A Texas state district court has ________ jurisdiction over any dispute involving
$500 or more, and __________ jurisdiction over appeals from Texas state agency
decisions.
original
appellate
A federal district (trial) court has _________ jurisdiction over appeals from federal
administrative agency decisions.
appellate
The United States Supreme Court has
_________ jurisdiction over disputes between
states.
original
The Rules of Decision Act provides that “the ___________________, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as______________ in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.”
laws of the several states
rules of decision
________________ interpreted the Rules of Decision Act to require federal courts to apply the general _______________ in cases where state law applied.
Swift v. Tyson
American common law
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins reversed Swift v. Tyson, holding that when state law applies in federal court, the federal court must apply _________________________________.
the law of the state in which that federal court sits.
____________________ coined the “____________________,” which provides that the ______ Doctrine mandates state law only where it affects substantive rights that are potentially outcome determinative.
Guaranty Trust v. York
outcome determinative test
Erie
___________________ modified the _________________________, holding that the court should____________________ in the case to determine which interests were stronger. _____ further held that one factor of the balancing test is whether the state law in question is __________________ outcome determinative. Thus, _____ gives more importance to state laws that absolutely change the outcome of the case.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge outcome determinative test balance state and federal interests Byrd absolutely or definitively Byrd
To determine the content of state law in federal court, the Erie Doctrine directs that the court look to ___________ and __________________________. Persuasive (but not binding) authority is found in _________________ and _______________. Erie also allows courts to make an ____________ as to state law.
state statutes decisions from the state's highest court lower state appellate courts federal court opinions on state law educated guess
The Rules Enabling Act (28 U.S.C. § 2072) provides the United States Supreme Court may enact the______________________, provided that no rule may ____________________ any substantive right.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
abridge, enlarge or modify
The most prominent Rules Enabling case is _____________, which resolves the conflict between the Rules Enabling Act and the _______________.
Hanna v. Plumer
Erie Doctrine
_______ v. Plumer also provides the current version of the ____ Doctrine, holding that if there is no ___________________ on point, then apply the Byrd test subject to the __________________.
Hanna
Erie
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
twin aims of Erie
Choice of law is the process by which courts deter mine which _______________ law will be applied in a case.
state’s or nation’s