objections Flashcards

1
Q

404

A

improper character evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

403

A

more prejudicial than probative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

611(c)

A

leading question (OBJECT TO DIRECT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

802

A

hearsay rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

801

A

DEFINITION of hearsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

805

A

hearsay within hearsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

602

A

lack of personal knowledge/speculation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

611a

A

badgering the witness (OBJECT TO CROSS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

401

A

rule of “relevant evidence” means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

402

A

RELEVANCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

relevance

A

all relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided by these Rules. Evidence which is NOT relevant is not admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

more prejudicial than probative

A

more prejudicial than probative: although relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issue, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needles presentation of cumulative evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

lack of personal knowledge

A

a witness may not testify to a matter unless the evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not, consist of the witness’s own testimony by expert witnesses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

701

A

opinion testimony by lay witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

opinion testimony by lay witness

A

if the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness’s testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are rationally based on the perception of the witness, and helpful to a clear understanding of the witness’s testimony of the determination of a fact in issue, and not based on scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge within the scope of 702

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

407

A

Subsequent remedial measures
when after and injury or harm allegedly caused by an event, measures are taken that if evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissable to prove negligence.

17
Q

408

A

compromise and offers to compromise