OBJ - Introduction to Clinical Reasoning Flashcards
List different strategies that physicians use to solve clinical problems
- Hypothetico-deductive
- Arrive at the diagnosis by considering each potential Dx in isolation without comparing/contrasting with other potential Dx
- Inefficient, redundant, but can be accurate
- Used by novice learners - Algorithm or schema
- Arrive at diagnosis through a series of prioritized decision points or steps
- Work through a series of “yes”/“no” ?s with branch points - Schema “plus”
- You create + tie concepts together–linking words (or meaningful connections)
- Causes, manifested by, resulting in, is treated by, such as
- Studies have shown helps organize thoughts, understanding - Key finding (key feature or key clue)
- Limited differential (splinter hemorrhage) - Heuristics (cognitive shortcuts)
- Consider CNS infection in all patients who present with fever and mental status changes
- Perform arthrocentesis in all patients presenting with acute monoarticular arthritis - Probabilistic (Bayesian)
- Applying statistical principals to patient encounters
- Experts usually do - Pattern recognition - Diagnosis “at a glance”
Describe how to construct a problem list
1) Prioritize & interpret various abnormal symptoms
2) Be as specific as possible to help refine differential Dx
3) 2 Strategies:
Splitting Splits/lists each symptom & relevant other historical information
- Characteristically complete
- Gives max opportunity to identify all the key findings and correct diagnosis (House)
- Can get lost in the trees (problems) and
miss the forest (dx)
- Great for: complicated presentations & unfamiliar/rare scenerios
Lumping lumps symptoms, exam findings, and lab abnormalities into a single problem (Occam’s razor)
- Emphasizes pathophysiological grouping of problems & creativity
- Premature dx/over simplification of a case
- May omit key details
- Great for: familiar/classic presentations, unifying dx hypotheses generated
Define sensitivity and specificity
Sensitivity:
- Not influenced by disease prevalence
- Proportion of patients with the disease who have a positive test
- Math = true positives/all patients with disease (true positives + false negatives)
- SNOUT -> Rule Out
Specificity:
- Not influenced by disease prevalence
- Proportion of patients in whom the disease is absent who have a negative test
- Math = true negatives/all patients without disease (true negatives + false positives)
- Can use to calculate false positive rate = 1-specificity
- SPIN-> Rule in
Calculate positive and negative predictive values
Positive predictive values IS influenced by disease prevalence
• The proportion of patients with a positive test who have the disease
• Math = true positives/all positive tests (True Positives + False Positives)
• Number without false positives
Negative predictive values IS influenced by disease prevalence
• The proportion of patients with a negative test who do not have the disease
• Math = true negatives/all negative tests ((True Negatives + False Negatives)
• Number without false negatives