Obesity in adults & bariatric surgery Flashcards

1
Q

Obesity intro media & stigma

A
  • represented in media by body only- rolls & burgers

- lack of control, lazy- stigmatized more then other EDs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Epidemiology of obesity in adults

-Health Survey for England 2015-

A

-overtime obesity stabilising from around 2002, was increasing until then.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Epidemiology - Age & Gender

-H S E- 2015

A
  • broadly same across genders
  • Men more overweight than Females
  • both M & F have weight jump from 35-44 to 45-54 years old -not biological factor it is social factor.
  • still many M not get to over 85+ y/o
  • F tend lose weight 85+- this typically occurs in the oldest ppl.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Epidemiology- Regional Variation

-H S E- 2015

A
  • North East only region where M outweigh F in obesity- manual labour?
  • urban, rural & suburban- diff types of work, food, financial pressures, food insecurity, family structures, cooking skills.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Epidemiology- Economic Variation

-H S E- 2015

A
  • lowest income jobs for M tend be manual labour- whilst not for F.
  • M across all incomes weigh roughly same.
  • M in lower income tend have less to spend on compared to F- (child care- F prioritise children’s food).
  • F as get lower income more overweight & obese you are.
  • F give birth- tend gain weight while pregnant- lower income have reduced weight loss after.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Epidemiology- Occupational class

A
  • F in lowest skills lvl- highest obesity v richer F.

- M less diff in obesity due to job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Consequences of obesity

-Calle et al 1999

A
  • looked at death rates & BMI
  • once have fat cells have them forever- can gain weight easier, more predisposed to higher weight.
  • M much higher risk of extremes of weight v F.
  • M’s BMI pref is higher than normal (24-25) however tend focus on Muscularity - not a reality.
  • Healthy ideals vary but can can be healthy at slightly low weight or slightly high.
  • risks at both extremes of BMI- however this research -could be done to pre-existing illnesses?- if low BMI & get ill have less of buffer to protect- could also be linked to age- as u get old tend lose weight.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Consequences of obesity

-Carey et al 2014

A
  • looked at % of M & F with depression by BMI category.
  • underweight M at most risk- farthest from muscular ideal or common with other disorders- drug use, other psych disorders.
  • normal & overweight low risk group.
  • obese roughly x2 likely- could be due to psychology of society against obesity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consequences of obesity
-National Obesity Observatory 2011
(diagram- look at notes)

A
  • found both moderators & mediators.
  • Moderators- like volume knobs, some more pronounced. (gender, lvl of obesity…)
  • Mediators- help explain relationship. Provide mechanism. (social factors, behavioural, bio, psychological)
  • -bi-directional.
  • exercise & eating well= decrease risk of depress.
  • Bio, obesity certain lvl= inflammation response- link to depress & other psych disorders.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Epidemiology- Long standing illness & obesity.

  • H S E- 2015
  • Bhaskaran et al 2014
A
  • not much diff b/w normal & overweight BMIs & illness.
  • obesity see, linked more illness in F v M.
  • type 2 diabetes with poor control overtime leads to blindness, amputation etc…
  • Bhaskaran et al 2014- cancer risk by BMI
  • -gall bladder, uterine have strong links, others have mild to no link (thyroid, cervix…).
  • -organs surrounded/covered in fat may be due to BMI & is linked to cancers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Contributing factors: The Foresight Report 2007

see notes for diagram

A
  • prevention not cure- if find what greatest risk factors for becoming obese.
  • The Foresight Report 2007-
  • -huge map, sought map broad range of factors that influence obesity & their interrelations.
  • -e.g. cheap ingredients- fructose, less fibre, convenience, alcohol, value on physical activity, parenting, stress.

-Simplified- (see image)- e.g. activity enviro- extremes- druggy park v village green= diff lvls of physical activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Contributing factors: Familial Transmission

  • programmes (tv)
  • H S E 2011
A
  • strong evidence that overweight & obesity runs in families- genetic & enviro factors.
  • a combo of genes & shared enviro factors & interactions b/w both account for this pattern.
  • –programmes- show stereotypical images- try make look stupid, not happy fam photos- done make us judge.

Health Survey for England 2011-

    • 24% boys aged 2-15 y/o living in overweight/obese households were obese v 11% in non-overweight households.
  • -21% girls v 10% non-obese.
  • -impact starts early.

-have be careful what we talk to kids about as it can make it worse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Contributing factors: Birth Weight

  • Yu et al 2013
  • Yu et al 2011
  • Qiao et al 2015
A

Yu et al 2013- maternal pre-preg BMI is pos associated with higher birth-weight for gestational age & also higher BMI in childhood.
–higher birthweight is ass with later obesity.

Yu et al 2011- BUT mixed indication that low birth weight is also associated with later obesity:
–mixed evidence!

Qiao et al 2015- low birth weight may predispose obesity in boys but not girls.

  • does nutrition in utero set metabolic patterns for life outside the womb i.e. the “foetal origins” hypothesis?
  • alterations in foetal nutrition may cause developmental adaptations that permanently change structures, physiology & metabolism, thereby predisposing individuals to overweight/obesity in adulthood.
  • if not avg birth weight- it can effect metabolic rates etc…
  • however you can’t test on foetuses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Contributing factors: Maternal Smoking in Pregnancy

  • systematic review
  • Oken et al 2008
A
  • Systematic review- direct exposure to prenatal tobacco via maternal smoking increases odds of obesity in children aged 2 & above.
  • smoking during the entire pregnancy had greater effect than smoking during pregnancy only.
  • Oken et al 2008- effects persist after rigorously controlling for confounds.
  • -confounds looked at- health, education, stress..
  • Smoking is a UNIQUE factor.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contributing factors: -Genetics

A
  • Congenital Leptin- leptin receptor deficiency.
  • -leptin produced by adipocytes & secreted in proportion to body fat mass- inhibits appetite.
  • —genetic mutations in leptin production OR reception result in massive overeating & obesity.
  • –but is very low proportion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Contributing factors: Epigenetic Influences

-Campion et al 2009; Symonds et al 2013

A
  • some syndromes diagnosed in early childhood- all rare.
  • genetic factors in population overweight/obese are extremely complex: 250+ alleles.
  • Epigenetics are beyond simple individual genetic predispositions.
  • -“heritable changes in gene expression that not involve changes underlying DNA sequence”.
  • change how genetics are expressed by what you eat, how you exercise & pollution exposure etc…

-Campion et al 2009; Symonds et al 2013- epigenetic changes can result from diet, in particular, but also other environmental changes.

17
Q

Contributing factors: Childhood Obesity.

-Simmons et al 2015

A
  • Simmons et al 2015- meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies.
  • -overall x5 likely be obese as adult if obese as a child.
  • -even weakest impact studies show x3 more likely.
  • -therefore need stop obesity in childhood.
  • -psychological welding as children.
  • -roughly 80% of obese adolescence still obese in adulthood.
  • -70% obese after 30 years- normal as a child.
  • -obesity persists less strongly from childhood to adolescence- around 50% obese children still obese in adolescence.
  • -however 70% obese adults were not obese as children or adolescence
  • -& 80% if obese ppl aged over 30 were not obese in adolescence.
  • -so childhood BMI has POOR SENSITIVITY to predict adult obesity.

-tracking childhood to adult overweight gave similar results: obesity is primarily an adult-onset condition.

18
Q

Contributing factors: Sedentary Behaviour

-Thorp et al 2011

A

Thorp et al 2011- reviewed 48 longitudinal studies looking links across time b/w sedentary behaviour & weight change.

  • -most studies used self-reported measures including combination of sitting time, TV viewing, non-TV screen time & other sedentary behaviours.
  • -was association with mortality & with weight gain from childhood to adult years.
  • -however mixed findings for links to diseases incidence, weight gain during adulthood & cardio-metabolic risk.
  • we are not designed as humans to sit down for long periods of time.
19
Q

Contributing factors: Sleep Duration

-Cappuccio et al 2008

A
  • short sleep defined as less than or 5 hours per night.

- Cappuccio et al 2008- short sleep, seem gain weight= issue for shift workers.

20
Q

Contributing factors: Smoking Cessation

  • Filozof et al 2005
  • Swan et al 1995
A

associated with weight gain.
-most ppl gain less than 4.5kg but 13% quitters gain at least 11kg.

  • Filozof et al 2005- ppl of African heritage, ppl <55 & heavy smokers are at higher risk of weight gain, as those of lower socio-economic status.
  • -genetic component to weight gain after cessation?
  • Swan et al 1995- pairwise concordance for weight change in 146 MZ & 111 DZ twin pairs in which both twins quit smoking was sig greater in MZ.
  • -nicotine appetite suppressor, hand to mouth need, smoking takes up time. Heavier smokers= more weight gain.
21
Q

Contributing factors: Increased Energy Intake Through Portion Size

  • Hollands et al 2015
  • Marteau et al 2015
A

-Hollands et al 2015- ppl consume more food/non-alcoholic drinks if offered larger sized portions or package or when using larger items of tableware.

  • Marteau et al 2015- the size of this effect suggests that eliminating larger items of tableware.
  • -reduce avg daily energy consumed by 12-16% among UK adults & 22-29% US adults.

Portions getting huge:

  • America 7oz to 42oz drinks.
  • messy portions- pack of crisps- 5 is a portion etc.
22
Q

Contributing factors: BED & Emotions

  • Marcus et al 1990
  • Ricca et al 2009
  • Spoor et al 2007
  • Polivy & Herman 1993
  • Van Strien 2012
A
  • binge-eating linked to obesity.
  • Marcus et al 1990- BED more common in M v other EDs- link to obesity.
  • Ricca et al 2009- BED in obese individuals highly ass with emotional eating.
  • Spoor et al 2007- pathology associated with excessive external & emotional eating is essentially different to other types of obesity.
  • Polivy & Herman 1993- research evidence to supp Affect Regulation Model- F BED- difficulty regulating neg emotions & try cope by binging.
  • Van Strien 2012- at least 40% community sample of obese-ppl- high lvls emotional eating.
23
Q

Where does that leave us?

  • population lvl
  • individual lvl
A
  • Population lvl- there are multiple points at which interventions to prevent or reverse obesity can be attempted.
  • Individual lvl- treatment for obesity include: health behaviour change, weight loss medication, bariatric surgery, occasionally psychotherapy (CBT or CBT-E) for binge-eating.
  • Smoking dropped in UK- due to making it expensive (most impact), stopped showing packets, no colours & pics, lack advertisement, socially unacceptable, smoking areas & shelters.
  • Sugar Tax- need to eat but eating in moderation is good- can’t vilify like you can with cigs.
  • -modelling from parents.
24
Q

Obesity care pathway
-Department of Health 2013.
(see notes)

A
  • Department of Health 2013:
  • Tier 4- surgery (bariatric).
  • Tier 3- specialist services (multidisciplinary intervention).
  • Tier 2- lifestyle intervention (multicomponent weight management).
  • Tier 1- universal prevention (environmental health promotion).
  • surgery only offered at high risk- medical risk.
  • not much investing in tier 1 or 2- which should be done to prevent need for upper tiers.
25
Q

Health behaviour change

  • Dombrowski, Sniehotta & Avenell 2011-
  • Dombrowski et al 2014-
A
  • Dombrowski, Sniehotta & Avenell 2011- just dieting in 6 months= most weight loss.
  • -keep weight off better if diet & activity in long-term 9 months+.
  • -initially exercise increases appetite so weight loss less at start- however keeps metabolism up so better in long run= more sustainable.
  • Dombrowski et al 2014- 45 trials, N= 7788- weight loss maintenance.
  • -1.56kg diff lifestyle interventions v controls.
  • -1.80kg diff lifestyle + drug used v control= best combo.
  • face-to-face interventions- remotely delivered.
  • hard to stay focused, have to learn how to eat properly.
26
Q

Weight loss meds

  • UK
  • Khera et al 2016
  • Butryn, Webb & Wadden 2011
  • Butryn et al 2001
A

-UK only Orlistat licenced- blocks digestions of trio-glycerides- leaves via poo- not very pleasant- risk of anal leakage- this also reduces desire to eat fatty food.

  • Khera et al 2016- systematic review of orlistat, lorcaserin, naxtrexone-bupropian, phentermine-topiramate & liraglutide v placebo- all associated with achieving >5% loss after a year.
  • USA- use other drugs- some amphetamines, some reduce insulin, some opiates= addiction.
  • Butryn, Webb & Wadden 2011- 8-10% weight loss in 6 months- with diet & exercise + basic behavioural therapy= better.
  • Butryn et al 2001- however 1st year 1/3 gained weight back, 5th year returned or weighed more.
27
Q

Bariatric surgery

  • what it does
  • NICE 2014; SIGN 2010
A

-induces weight loss by REDUCING size of stomach, REMOVING portion of stomach or RESECTING & RE-ROUTING the small intestine to a small stomach pouch.
(sleeve gastrectomy, gastric banding, gastric bypass).

  • reduces amount you can eat & surface area can absorb from.
  • but easy to get malnourished, lack vitamins, minerals.
  • offered if BMI 40+ or 35-40 & tried other methods or with co-morbidities (diabetes) that are expected to improve with weight loss (NICE 2014; SIGN 2010).
  • all appropriate non-surgical measured tried without success- the patient has/will receive intensive weight loss management.
  • often need lose 10kg first= hard, so proves you want to lose weight.
28
Q

Bariatric surgery: Effectiveness

-Robinson 2009; Buchwald et al 2004

A

-long-term studies show:
Robinson 2009; Buchwald et al 2004; remission from diabetes, improvement cardiovascular risk factors, reduction in mortality of 23% from 40%, (possible) improvements in psychological issues.

  • more effective than conservative treatment (drug/lifestyle intervention).
  • cost effective- cost a lot upfront but cost alone diabetic meds recouped within 3 years.
  • not quick fix & is risky- can’t eat normally again.
29
Q

Bariatric surgery: Weight Regain After

A
  • if weight regain occurs is the surgery still cost effective?
  • should we focus on post-operative issues in the pre-operative phase, teaching skills to MAINTAIN weight loss?
  • are effective strategies for weight maintenance the same as those for weight loss?

-typical trend to gain some weight after 24 months, slow increase.

30
Q

Bariatric surgery: Surgery risks

4

A

Surgical complications- morality (low 0.25% within 90 days), bleeding, infection, dmg to other structures, hospital readmission, extended stay.

Patient non-adherence- to postoperative requirements, important dietary instructions, maintaining sufficient lvls of physical activity, sabotages success of surgery.

Patient satisfaction- body image issues are common- left with lots of loose skin- body image issues.

Long-term weight outcomes- weight regain common.

31
Q

Factors associated with “success”

-Sarwer et al 2008-

A
  • Sarwer et al 2008- weight loss success depends on patient adherence to pre & post-surgical procedure.
  • some factors ass with success or failure: demographic variables, pre-op weight, motivation & expectations, presence (or not) of ED, psychological functioning, personality, psychiatric disorders.
32
Q

Postoperative issues

-Lynch 2016

A
  • non-adherence to dietary & lifestyle requirements.
  • Lynch 2016- disordered eating patterns are common & patients can find it challenging to match mind to body- loose skin.
  • not always a robust follow-up process after surgery e.g. follow-up with psychologist.
  • -rare because cus surgery is rare itself.
33
Q

Alternative treatments

  • Linehan 1993
  • Hayes et al 1999
  • Lillis et al 2009
  • Tapper et al 2009
A

-Linehan 1993- Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT)- modified for BED= effective in 82% of F after full treatment (6 months) abstain from BED.

  • Hayes et al 1999- Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT)- third generation intervention. -slow become adopted for weight loss.
  • about acceptance, mindfulness & value processes to produce psychological flexibility
  • –e.g. if don’t exercise look at why? fear of being judged at gym? v Skills Based Therapy (SBT)- behavioural changes0 try go to gym early or late.
  • Lillis et al 2009- 1 day ACT workshop (5 hours) to increase psych flexibility & reduce avoidance.
  • -3 month follow-up additional 1.6% weight loss v 0.3% gain of control.
  • Tapper et al 2009- 1 time 2 hour ACT. 6 months after engaging in sig more physical activity.
  • decrease on avg 2.3 kg.