Obedience: Situational Variables Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the initial baseline score at the baseline study at Yale university? (percentage of fully obedient participants)

A

65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How was the proximity variation different to the normal study?

A

In the original study the teacher and learner where in adjoining rooms, so the teacher could hear the learner but not see him. In the proximity variation, they were in the same room.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the results for the proximity variation?

A

Obedience fell from 65% (original) to 40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How was the location variation different to the normal study?

A

In the original study the experiment was carried out in a prestigious university department and in the location variation it was carried out in a run-down building rather than the prestigious university.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the results for the location variation?

A

Obedience fell from 65% (original) to 47.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the results for the authority figure and teacher proximity variation?

A

Obedience fell from 65% (original) to 20.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are situational variables?

A

Features of an environment that affect the degree to which individuals yield to group pressures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How was the authority figure and teacher proximity variation different to the normal study?

A

In the original study the authority figure is in the same room as the teacher whilst in the variation the authority figure gave the teacher instructions through the telephone instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was the authority figure appearance variation different to the normal study?

A

Obedience fell from 65% (original) to 20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the results for the authority figure appearance variation?

A

In the original study the authority figure wears a traditional lab coat whilst in the variation the authority figure was called away on the phone and replaced with an ‘ordinary member of the public’ (confederate) in everyday clothes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the results for the social support variation?

A

Obedience fell from 65% (original) to 10%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How was the social support variation different to the normal study?

A

In the original study there was one single teahcer reading word-pairs giving the punishment whilst in the variation there were two other confederate teachers who acted as dissenters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How was the peer shocks variation different to the normal study?

A

In the normal study the single teacher reads the word-pairs and gives punishments whilst in the variation there would be another confederate who actually presses the button to shock them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AO3 - Research support.

A

Bickman (1974) had three confederates dress in different outfits in New York City; a jacket and tie, a milkman and security guard. They asked people to pick up litter and found people were twice as likely to obey the assistant dressed as a security guard than one in a jacket and tie. This supports the conclusion that uniform conveys authority and produces obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Did Bickman (1974) support or criticise Milgram’s conclusion?

A

He supported the idea that uniform conveys authority and demands obedience as people were twice as likely to obey a security guard uniform than a jacket and tie.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AO3 - Internal validity.

A

Orne and Holland criticised Milgram’s original study because they believed participants knew the shocks were fake. They said that it was even more likely they figured it out in this experiment due to the extra manipulation.

17
Q

AO3 - Cross-cultural replications.

A

Cross-cultural findings have been generally supportive of Milgram, Miranda (1981) found an obedience rate over 90% in Spanish students. This suggests Milgram’s findings are able to be generalised to a wider population.

18
Q

AO3 - Variable control.

A

A strenght of Milgram’s studies is the extremely high variable control, he systematically altered one variable at a time to make sure the variables where being tested.

19
Q

AO3 - The ‘obedience alibi’.

A

MIlgram’s findings support a situational explanation of obedience, however Mandel (1998) argued that it offers an excuse or an ‘alibi’ for evil behaviours.