obedience - milgram Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define obedience

A

A form of social influence. in which an individual follows a direct order. The person issuing the order is usually a figure of authority, who has the power to punish when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

introduction of milligrams study.

A

wanted to answer the question of why such a high proportion of Germans supported Hilter.

were they more obedient?

40 male participants. Volunteer. aged between 20 and 50 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

procedure of milligrams study

A

rigged draw for their role. - A confederate was always the ‘learner’ while the true participant was the ‘teacher’.

An ‘experimenter’ (another confederate) wore a lab coat. Participants were told they could leave the study at any time.

learner strapped into a chair in another room teacher had to give the learner an increasingly severe electric ‘shock’ each time he made a mistake up to 450 volts

teachers were not told that the shocks were all fake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what happened if the participant didn’t want to continue.

A

experimenter used a sequence of four standard ‘prods’:

(Prod 1) ‘Please continue’ or ‘Please go on.’
(Prod 2) ‘The experiment requires that you continue.’
(Prod 3) ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue.’
(Prod 4) ‘You have no other choice, you must go on.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

findings of milligrams study

A

No participant stopped below 300 volts.

12.5% stopped at 300 volts.

65% continued to the highest level of 450 volts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conclusions of milligrams study

A

Observations indicated that participants showed signs of extreme tension;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

1 limitation of study

A

lacked internal validity.

Orne and Holland (1968) : said participants guessed the electric shocks were fake. therefore Milgram was not testing what he intended to test

Sheridan and King’s: conducted a similar study - participants gave real shocks to a puppy. 54% of males and 100% of females delivered a fatal shock.

effects in Milgram’s study were genuine because people behaved the same way with real shocks. 70% of his participants said they believed the shocks were genuine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1 strength of study

A

research support.

French documentary contestants in a reality TV game show were paid to give (fake) electric shocks – when ordered by the presenter – to other participants (actors).

80% gave the maximum 450 volts to an apparently unconscious man. Their behaviour was like that of Milgram’s participants, e.g. many signs of anxiety.

replication supports Milgram’s original conclusions- his findings were not just a one-off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly