Obedience Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is obedience?

A

Obedience is a type of social influence where a person follows an order from another person who is usually an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the procedure of Milgram’s Shock study?

A

He conducted a lab experiment in which two participants were assigned either the role of a teacher (this was always given to the true participant) or learner (a confederate called Mr. Wallace).

The teacher and learner were put into separate rooms. The teacher was then asked by the experimenter (who wore a lab coat) to administer electric shocks (which were actually harmless) to the learner each time he gave the wrong answer. These shocks increased every time the learner gave a wrong answer, from 15 - 450 volts.

Prod 1: please continue.
Prod 2: the experiment requires you to continue.
Prod 3: It is absolutely essential that you continue.
Prod 4: you have no other choice but to continue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the findings from Milgram’s shock study?

A

The results were that all participants went to 300 volts and 65% were willing to go all the way to 450 volts.

he carried out 18 variations of his study. when the experimenter instructed and prompted the teacher by telephone from another room, obedience fell to 20.5%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some criticisms of Milgram’s shock study?

A
  • this study lacked ecological validity as it was carried out in a lab under artificial conditions. This means that it might not be possible to generalise the finding to a real life setting, as people do not usually receive orders to hurt another person in real life.
  • the sample was biased. Milgram only used males in his study and this means we cannot generalise the results to females.
  • Deception – the participants actually believed they were shocking a real person, and were unaware the learner was a confederate of Milgram’s.
  • ## Participants were exposed to extremely stressful situations that may have the potential to cause psychological harm. Many of the participants were visibly distressed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some strengths of Milgram’s shock study?

A
  • Milgram’s work has provided to social Psychology. For instance Milgram’s work gives an insight into why people under the Nazi reign were willing to kill Jews when given orders to do so. It also highlights how we can all be blind to obedience often doing things without question.
  • A strength of the study is that it used a standardised procedure because it was a lab experiment. This is good because it improves the reliability of the study and also helps establish a causal relationship.
  • Milgram did debrief the participants fully after the experiment and also followed up after a period of time to ensure that they came to no harm.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Agentic State?

A

people will obey an authority when they believe that the authority will take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how was the agency theory supported by Milgram’s evidence ?

A
  • when participants were reminded that they had responsibility for their own actions, almost none of them were prepared to obey. In contrast, many participants who were refusing to go on did so if the experimenter said that he would take responsibility’.
  • Another example of the agenetic state involved a variation of Milgram’s study whereby participants could instruct an assistant (confederate) to press the switches. In this condition 92.5% shocked to the maximum 450 volts. This shows when there is less personal responsibility obedience increases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Autonomous state?

A

‘Autonomy’ means to be independent or free. A person in an Autonomous state is free to behave according to their own principles and therefore feels a sense of responsibility for their own actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an agentic shift?

A

This is the shift from autonomy to ‘agency’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Milgram suggest about the agentic shift?

A

He suggested that this occurs when a person perceives someone else as a figure of authority. This other person has greater power because of their position in a social hierarchy. In most social groups when one person is in charge, others defer to this person and shift from autonomy to agency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are binding factors?

A

They are aspects of the situation that allow the person to ignore or minimise the damaging effect of their behaviour and thus reduce the ‘moral strain’ they are feeling. Milgram proposed a number of strategies that the individual uses, such as gifting the responsibility to the victim or denying the damage they were doing in the first place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is legitimacy of authority?

A

Societies are structure in a hierarchal way and therefore certain people hold authority over the rest of us. The authority they hold is legitimate in the sense that it is agreed by society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a consequence of legitimacy of authority?

A

Some people are granted the power to punish others. Most of us accept that the police and courts have the power to punish wrongdoers. So we are willing to give up some of our independence and to hand control of our behaviour over to people we trust to exercise their authority appropriately.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is destructive authority?

A

History has shown that charismatic and powerful leaders can use their legitimate powers for destructive purposes, ordering people to behave in ways that are callous, cruel, stupid an dangerous. Destructive authority was very clearly on show in Milgram’s study, when the experimenter used prods to order participants to behave in ways that went against their consciences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a strength of agentic state?

A

There is research support. Blass and Schmitt (2001) showed a film of Milgram’s study to students and asked them to identify who they felt was responsible for the harm to the learner. The students blamed the ‘experimenter’ rather than the participant. The students also indicated that the responsibility was due to legitimate authority but also due to expert authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a limitation of agentic state?

A

It doesn’t explain many of the research findings. For example, it does not explain why some of the participants did not obey. It also does not explain the findings from Hofling et al.’s study. The agentic shift explanation predicts that, as the nurses handed over responsibility to the doctor, they should have shown levels of anxiety similar to Milgram’s participants, as they understood their role in a destructive process. But that was not the case.
This suggests that, at best, agentic shift can only account for some situations of obedience.

17
Q

What is a strength of legitimacy of authority as an explanation of obedience?

A

A strength is that it is a useful account of cultural differences in obedience. Many studies show that countries differ in the degree to which people are traditionally obedient to authority. Kilham and Mann (1974) replicated Milgram’s procedure in Australia and found that only 16% of their participants went all the way to the top of the voltage scale. On the other hand, Mantell (1971) found a very different figure for German participants - 85%.
This shows that in some cultures, authority is more likely to be accepted as legitimate and entitled to demand obedience from individuals. This reflects the ways that different societies are structured and how children are raised to perceive authority figures. This increases the validity of the explanation.

18
Q

What is another strength of legitimacy of authority?

A

A strength of the legitimacy of authority explanation is that it can help explain how obedience can lead to real-life war crimes. Kerman and Hamilton (1989) argue that the My Lai massacre can be understood in terms of the power hierarchy of the US army.

19
Q

What was the procedure of Adorno’s study?

A

Adorno et al. (1950) investigated the causes of the obedient personality in a study of more than 2000 middle-class, white Americans and their unconscious attitudes towards other racial groups. They developed several scales to investigated this, including the potential for fascism scale which is still used to measure authoritarian personality.

20
Q

What were the findings of Adorno et al.’s study?

A

People with authoritarian leanings identified with ‘strong’ people and were generally contemptuous of the ‘weak’. They were very conscious of their own and others’ status, showing excessive respect, deference and servility to those of higher status.
Adorno et al. Also found that authoritarian people had a cognitive style where there was no ‘fuzziness’ between categories of people, with fixed and distinctive stereotypes about other groups. There was a strong positive correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice.