NZBORA Flashcards
Why are rights important
Inherent rights of person, their role •fair and legitimate justice system •crime control v Due process •blackstones ratio •beyond the court •relationship between state and citizen
How are human rights protected in NZ
• Universal declaration of human rights
NZ part of many international treating regarding human rights:
•HRA 1993
•PA 1993/2020
•NZBORA 1990
BORA within the constitution
•Non-supreme law • bora 1990 is entrenched law • there is a breach of remedies which include: -exclusion of evidence -reduction of sentence -compensation -others
Right to be presumed innocent
- Adversarial criminal justice system and power imbalance
- Woolminton v DPP 1935
- s25 (c) of the BORA 1990
- mens rea and actus reus
- burden of proof and standard of proof
- reasonable doubt
- insanity
Other substantive rights BORA
- s8 right not to be deprived of life
- s9 right not to be subject to torture or cruel treatment
- s14 right to freedom of expression
- s18 freedom of movement
Procedural rights BORA
s21 right not to be subject to unreasonable search and seizure
Section 26 BORA
- retroactive penalties (to be convicted,must be a law at the time of the offence
- double jeopardy (cannot be convicted or punished twice)
Effect of Woolmington
4 steps
Step 1: prosecution = actus reus + men’s rea = beyond reasonable doubt
Step 2: defendant= raise reasonable doubt( burden to refute)
Step 3: defendants = raise evidence to suggest defence ( evidentiary burden)
Step 4: prosecution= prove defence not available ( beyond reasonable doubt)
Examples illustrating the needs for human rights in criminal justice
- police brutality
- discrimination
- prisoners justice
- extrajudicial executions
- arbitrary detention
Expectations regarding the onus of proof
- explicit override by legislation
- insanity
- statute silent on mens rea
- strict liability
The right to freedom of movement
- s18 of the BORA
* limitations in terms of statute and regulation
2 steps to whether a search and seizure was unreasonable
- Was there a search and seizure
2. Was the search or seizure unreasonable
What does proof beyond reasonable doubt mean?
- Defence does not have to prove innocence
- Defence does not have to collaborate or participate in defence
- Presumption of innocence gives rise to right to silence and right against self-incrimination
Beyond reasonable doubt v balance of probabilities
- Criminal versus civil standard of proof
- Beyond reasonable doubt = acquit if reasonable, genuine, realistic, doubt
- Must be sure
- Constraint on decision to prosecute
The right to not be deprived of life
- section 8 of the BORA
- Physician assisted dying ( seales v AG)
- police action
- death in state care