Nuisance And Rylands V Fletcher Flashcards
What is the legal principle established in the case of Rylands v Fletcher?
The rule of strict liability for escapes of dangerous substances.
What is the difference between private nuisance and public nuisance?
Private nuisance affects individual properties, while public nuisance affects the general public or a community.
True or False: Nuisance is a tort that involves intentional harm.
False
What are the two types of nuisance recognized in law?
Private nuisance and public nuisance.
Fill in the blank: In the case of Rylands v Fletcher, the defendant was held liable for the escape of ____________ substance onto the plaintiff’s land.
dangerous
What is the main defense in a nuisance claim?
Reasonable user.
What is the key element in establishing liability under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?
Escape of a dangerous substance.
What is the general test for private nuisance?
Substantial and unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land.
True or False: In the case of Rylands v Fletcher, the defendant’s actions were considered negligent.
False
What is the key difference between nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher?
Nuisance requires proof of fault, while Rylands v Fletcher imposes strict liability.
What is the remedy typically sought in a nuisance claim?
Damages or an injunction.
What is the rationale behind the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?
To ensure that those who engage in dangerous activities are responsible for any harm caused by their activities.
Fill in the blank: In a private nuisance claim, the interference must be ____________ and unreasonable.
substantial
What is the Latin term used in Rylands v Fletcher to describe the escape of a dangerous substance?
Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas.
True or False: The rule in Rylands v Fletcher only applies to landowners.
False