Nozick - Locke Flashcards

1
Q

Rights as absolute, exceptionless side constraints (Nozick)

A

One should eliminate from consideration those options that would involve one’s violating any individual’s moral rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Separateness of persons (1/2) (Nozick)

A

Underlying Kantian principle that individuals are ends and not merely means
Not be sacrificed/used for achieving of other ends without their consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Separateness of persons (2/2) (Nozick)

A

There is no social entity with a good that undergoes some sacrifice for its own good.
Individual people, own individual lives
Using one of these people to benefit others, uses him and benefits the others. Nothing more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-ownership (1/5) (Nozick)

A

An exclusive right to control and use ourselves as we see fit, so long as it does not infringe others’ rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Self-ownership (2/5) (Nozick)

A

Rights to transfer these rights to others (by sale, rental, gift, loan)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Self-ownership (3/5) (Nozick)

A

Immunities to the non-consensual loss of these rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self-ownership (4/5) (Nozick)

A

Compensation rights in case others use us without our consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Self-ownership (5/5) (Nozick)

A

Enforcement rights (rights to restrain persons about to violate these rights)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lockean rights (1/5)

A

Moral right to act in way chosen with sth legitimately own
Not impinging on others (harm, frustrate their interest) in ways
- force
- fraud
- theft
- physically harming another person, property
- breach of contract
- threatening (sth on this list)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lockean rights (2/5)

A

Others not impinge on her (in specified ways)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lockean rights (3/5)

A

Each legitimately, fully owns herself

No one has any initial property rights in any other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lockean rights (4/5)

A

Can acquire full ownership over unowned material resources by staking out a claim
Claiming ownership leaves others no worse off (than unowned, freely available resources)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lockean rights (5/5)

A

Ownership rights - can be transferred to other persons by gift, contract (or abandoned, revert to unowned status)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Nozick’s entitlement theory (1/3)

A

Principle of justice in acquisition

Initial acquisition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Nozick’s entitlement theory (2/3)

A

Principle of justice in transfer (voluntary exchange and gifts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nozick’s entitlement theory (3/3)

A

Principle of rectification of injustice
(How to deal with holdings that are unjustly acquired, transferred)
- no one is entitled to a holding except by (repeated applications of 1 and 2)

17
Q

How do we initially acquire property?
Previously unowned
No: If the position of others no longer at liberty to use the thing is thereby worsened

A

Nozickian proviso (property right)

18
Q

Normal process (Locke)

A
Labour of his body
Work of his hands
Removes out of the state of nature
- mixed his labour with
- joyned to it sth that is his own
  > his property
19
Q

Wilt Chamberlain (Nozick)

A

Society has an equal distribution, D1
1 mil people voluntarily pay 25c each to see WC play
WC is 250000 richer, each 25c poorer, D2
> Has any injustice occured?

20
Q

Tis very preposterous, to imagine, that we can have any idea of property, without fully comprehending the nature of justice (3/3)

A

Hume

A Treatise of Human Nature

21
Q

Our property is nothing but those goods, whose constant possession is established by the laws of society, by the laws of justice
- explain the origin of justice: property, right, obligation (1/3)

A

Hume

A Treatise of Human Nature

22
Q

A man’s property is some object related to him. This relation is not natural, but moral and founded on justice. (2/3)

A

Hume

A Treatise of Human Nature

23
Q

Property as natural (2)

A

Locke

Otsuka

24
Q

Property as natural

A

Limit on state
Historical
Social contract

25
Q

Property as convention (1)

A

Hume

Comes from agreement

26
Q

Property as convention

A

Created by state
Patterned (procedural justice)
Post-state

27
Q

Method of acquisition (MA) (Locke)

A
Every man has property in his own person
No body has right but himself
Labour of his body
Work of his hands
Removes out of the state of nature
- mixed his labour with
- joyned to it sth that is his own
  > his property
28
Q

Waste proviso (WP) (Locke)

A

How far has God given it to us

  • to enjoy
  • as much as any one can make use of to any advantage of life before it spoils
  • so much he may by his labor fix a property
  • whatever beyond this, is more than his share, belongs to others
29
Q

Enough and as good proviso (EP) (Locke)

A

No mans could subdue
Nor could his enjoymeny consume more than a small part
Impossible for any man to intrench upon the right of another
Acquire to himself a property to the prejudice of his neighbor
- who would still have room, for as good, and as large a possession (after the other had taken out of his) as beforr it was appropriated

30
Q

Method of acquisition (MA) (Locke)

A
Every man has property in his own person
No body has right but himself
Labour of his body
Work of his hands
Removes out of the state of nature
- mixed his labour with
- joyned to it sth that is his own
  > his property
31
Q

Waste proviso (WP) (Locke)

A

How far has God given it to us

  • to enjoy
  • as much as any one can make use of to any advantage of life before it spoils
  • so much he may by his labor fix a property
  • whatever beyond this, is more than his share, belongs to others
32
Q

Enough and as good proviso (EP) (Locke)

A

No mans could subdue
Nor could his enjoymeny consume more than a small part
Impossible for any man to intrench upon the right of another
Acquire to himself a property to the prejudice of his neighbor
- who would still have room, for as good, and as large a possession (after the other had taken out of his) as beforr it was appropriated