Nov 27: Connections across our course

Question 1

How do the concepts of territory, identity, and power figure in each of our course units?

Answer 1

Rrecurring theme is the dynamic interaction of territory, identity, and power. Political power is exerted through bordering practices that delineate land and population. Borders transform land into territory, controllable and enclosed by political authorities. These borders are crucial in defining identity, determining who belongs and who doesn’t. Archaeology contributes to modern narratives by connecting past achievements to current territorial claims. In essence, land represents both power and identity, and our course explores these complex relationships.

Question 2

What are the key ideas we highlighted from each of our units in this discussion?

Answer 2

Political Geography:
Borders as tools of power and control.
Borders define identity and belonging.
Case study: Turkey’s borders highlight security concerns, dehumanization, and violations of human rights.
Archaeology:
Material remains reveal past identities and territorial organization.
Artifacts and imagery reflect beliefs and power dynamics.
Borders were often implicit, based on shared practices rather than physical barriers.
Individual perspectives on borders are largely unknown due to limited evidence.
Literary and Visual Analysis:
Framework focuses on border practices and perspectives of marginalized groups.
Imaginative texts explore war, displacement, and borders.
Examples include:
Azzam’s short stories constructing national identity.
“The Albina Case” and “Minor Detail” engaging with power and history.
“Infiltrators” representing agency.
Murals, posters, and “Be Quiet” expressing solidarity and intimacy