Nov. 25th Lecture and Readings Flashcards
How does Portugal deal with drug use and addiction?
From a health point and not criminal point- decriminalizing drugs
What other part of the world is progressing drug policies?
Netherlands at forefront for progressive drug policies- weed always allowed there
social control- informal
to want to be good ppl- outward appearance or your conscious is wanting you to do good things
- stronger in smaller, traditional, more homogeneous communities when compared to large complex places- the more complex and diverse a society is, the more formal control we need to mandate or prohibit behavior
folkways
more est norms of common practise
Ex: how to eat, use of language, how you speak to friends vs family, how you dress- ppl expected to behave in xyz
Mores
associated w intense feelings of right and wrong- morality of it all, things that are not supposed to be violated- you do not kill someone, you do not lie to others or take things that are not yours- does not have to be criminal but can be
the potency to “click to judge”
social media- you go on instagram and read comments and ppl are quick to voice their opinions than what someone would say to others faces, reviews- we look at them before booking a hotel and ppl can be so hung up on bad reviews even if it is 10 out of 10,000- maintaining reputation in the era as social media is a highlight reel and ppl want to appear to outside world in certain way and not a reflection of what their life rlly looks like
formal social control
- Arise when informal controls are insufficient to maintain conformity to norms
- We create this more formal justice system to deal w ppl not abiding by laws from the state
2 types of formal social control
- Those instituted by the state and authorized to use force (police)- mandated by government
- Those imposed by agencies other than the state (university- rules on plagiarism, churches, labor groups, workplace)
when is someone considered an agent of social control
anyone who attempts to manipulate the behaviour of others through the use of formal sanctions may be considered an agent of social control
Who can be an agent of social control?
Agents of social control can be anyone who can manipulate behavior of others and have consequences and rewards for this- the state and also teachers, principal etc.
Bullicide
things happening in our world can have impact on things that can become interest to legislators- mandating more things that will be formally controlled
Most highly structured formal system
CJS
Legalization
norms are moved from social level to actual legal level
Ex: before it was mandated not to text and drive, then accidents happened and this led to legalization of texting and driving policy
political- conflict perspective- punishment
1) inflicted by the group in its corporate capacity upon one who is regarded as a member of the same group- CJS defines and punishes ppl who are citizens, immigrants etc. Of CAN- all part of same community- they have allowance to punish ppl for wrongdoings
2) Involves pain or suffering- someone assaulting you, or even emotional, financial, someone destroying property- this can be subjective to the person and their own experiences
purpose of punishment (3)
- Retribution- retaliating against offender
- General deterrence
Ex: punishment should fit the crime- if you steal candy you would not be locked up - Incapacitation- when locked up in a building w concrete walls and locked in cell- someone telling them what to do on a daily basis
individual or specific vs general deterrence
General deterrence: if something is illegal nobody is going to do it
Ex: all of us decide we will not kill someone bc we don’t want to go to prison
Specific deterrence: if you were driving and texting and got a fine and license suspended, you would be less inclined to do it in the future- own personal experience
Cost/ benefits (hedonistic caucus)
punishment outweighs benefits of crime
Effectiveness of threats is conditioned on 3 variables
- Severity of the punishment- does not always weigh in bc ppl still commit death penalty crimes
- Certainty- if you commit a crime you will be caught and penalized for it
- Speed with which it is applied- if you commit a crime today you will be punished in near future, but this is not how it works right now, it could take months or years to get trial
instrumental offences vs expressive offences
Instrumental offences = directed to material end- using crime as instrument to get something
Ex: evade paying taxes, embezzle money from employer- usually some planning
- Deterring impact better at instrumental crimes bc ppl plan these out
Expressive offences are violent ones like murder- behavior is the end itself and you want to hurt this person, that is what you get out of it
- Expressive crimes esp ones of passion are not using deterrence bc ppl are being irrational
high vs low commitment offences
High commitment crimes = no deterrence often does not work
- Highly committed to outcome- paying someone for what they have done
Low commitment crimes = yes to deterrence
when was death penalty abolished?
2015: 140 countries had abolished the death penalty in law or practice:
what countries are retaining capital punishment
Democracies retaining capital punishment: US, India, Japan
what is the death penalty for?
imposed or implemented to punish
- in China, Thailand and Vietnam
is capital punishment a more effective deterrent vs long prison sentneces?
There is no research suggesting this