Notice Flashcards
Mullane
DP requires that notice must be REASONABLY CALCULATED under all the circumstances to apprise the party of the proceeding. Notice can be constitutional even if the defendant didn’t get actual notice because it was reasonably calculated under the circumstances (e.g. notice by publication reasonable if don’t know names of parties)
Nat. Dev. Co.
Under Fed. R. Civ. Pro 4(e)(2)(B), service is proper at the party’s usual place of abode or residence.
What does process consist of? Rule 4
A copy of a summons and a complaint
Rule 4(a)
When must a ∆ be served?
∆ must be served within 90 days of filing a complaint
Rule 4(m)
How long does ∆ have to answer after receipt of service of process? Rule 12
21 days
FRCP 12(a)(1)(A)(i)
Who can service of process be made on? Rule 4
Any non-party who is at least 18 years old
FRCP 4(c)
How will a ∆ be served? Rule 4
Personal Service, Substituted Service, Service on ∆’s Agent, or any method permitted under state law.
FRCP 4(e)
How do we serve process on a business? Rule 4
Service on officer, managing or general agent.
Officer: Corp. Pres.
Job responsibilities of managing or general agent matter.
FRCP 4(h)(1) & (e)(1)
Can a ∆ waive formal service of process? Rule 4
Yes. Waiver by first-class mail. π must send 2 copies of waiver-form and self-addressed stamped envelope. If ∆ signs and returns within 30 days, ∆ waives formal service of process.
FRCP 4(d)
If ∆ waives formal service, what else does she waive?
∆ waives no other defenses other than formal service of process
How long does ∆ have to respond if she waives formal service of process? Rule 4
∆ has 60 days to respond, 90 days if outside U.S. judicial district
FRCP 4(d)(3)
What if ∆ refuses to waive formal service of process? Rule 4
∆ responsible for the costs of formal service of process
FRCP 4(d)(2)
What are the geographic limitations on service of process? Rule 4
We can serve process throughout the state where the federal court sits.
Can serve process outside forum if a state court could do so as well.
FRCP 4(k)(1)(A)
Opportunity to be heard test (Mathews v. Eldridge)
1) the private interest at stake in the administrative action;
(2) the risk of an erroneous deprivation of this interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and
(3) the government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that additional or substitute procedural requirements would entail.