Notes to flashcards
(51 cards)
What are the 5 symptoms of PAD?
- leg or buttock pain
- wounds and ulcers
- leg numbness
- cold feet
- tissue loss
What %age of PAD symptoms are asymptomatic?
50%
What are the classifications of the Rutherford?
0-asymptomatic
claudication
1-mild
2-moderate
3-severe
Critical Limb ischemia
4-ischemic rest pain
5-minor tissue loss
6-major tissue loss (functional foot not salvageable)
define “atheromatous”
an abnormal fatty deposit in an artery
What is the purpose of Rotarex magnetic slip-clutch?
instant disengagement with obstruction. safety feature.
What must the iliac bifurcation be greater than for Rotarex indication?
4cm
What must ACT score be higher than for Rotarex cases?
250
What are the 3 mechanisms of action for Rotarex?
- rotating abrading vortex
- continuous active aspiration
- modifying beveled tip
What are the 8 key benefits of Rotarex?
- dual indication atherectomy and thrombectomy
- active aspiration - minimizes embolization
- dual cutting mechanism - cuts at tip and side windows
- vessel preparation - may enhance take-up of PTX
- reduces need for stents
- reasonable maximum run time
- no limitation on lesion length
- no need for distal filter
Rotarex meta-analysis
- how many patients?
- what is the freedom of TLR @ 6 months?
- what is the freedom of TLR @ 12 months?
- how many patients? 2107
- freedom of TLR @ 6 months- 92.2%
- freedom of TLR @ 12 months- 88.7%
Leipzig Trial (not level 1 data) for Rotarex
- how many patients?
- what % of total chronic fem-pop treated
- what % were CLI (Rutherford 4-6)
- what was the mean lesion length?
- What % of occlusions?
- what % used distal protection? how many vessel run-offs?
- what is the distal embolization rate?
- what is the 12 month FTLR?
- 658 patients
- 56.7% of total chronic fem-pop treated (373)
- 60.3% were CLI (Rutherford 4-6)
- 14.8cm mean lesion length
- 100% occlusions
- (41) 6.2% used distal protection. 1 vessel run-off.
- 3.2% low distal embolization rate
- 90.1% 12 month FTLR
Rotarex 6F stats
1. vessel diameters
2. sheath compatibility
3. max. rotation speed
4. max aspiration speed
5. catheter external diameter
6. guidewire
Rotarex 6F stats
1. 3mm + vessel diameters
2. 6Fr - sheath
3. 60,000 rpm - max. rotation speed
4. 45 ml/min - max aspiration speed
5. 2mm - catheter external diameter
6. .018 guidewire
Rotarex 8F stats
1. vessel diameters
2. sheath compatibility
3. max. rotation speed
4. max aspiration speed
5. catheter external diameter
6. guidewire
Rotarex 8F stats
1. 5mm + vessel diameters
2. 8Fr - sheath
3. 45,000 rpm - max. rotation speed
4. 75 ml/min - max aspiration speed
5. 2.7mm - catheter external diameter
6. .018 guidewire
Lutonix Indication
PTA, after appropriate vessel preparation, of de novo, restenotic, or in stent restenotic lesions up to 300mm in length native superficial femoral or popliteal arteries with reference vessel diameters of 4-7mm.
lutonix mechanism of action and how it works
2 ug/mm^2 of PTX Paclitaxel
stops cell division and cell growth in the metaphase
This prolongs restenosis and intimal hyperplasia
lutonix carrier?
How can you prove it limits drug flaking?
polysorbate and sorbitol
limits drug flaking bc data shows <.08% is lost in the sheath and <.1% lost during balloon prep
How was lutonix formulation created?
50k balloons
>250 formulations, >225 carriers
45 pre clinical studies
1 balloon
Lutonix Levant 1 study
- what is it?
- who did it?
- study arms?
- what did it show a. at 30 days b. 60 days c. 90 days d. distal embolization? at what dose?
Lutonix Levant 1 study
- what is it? Pre clinical safety data
- who did it? Dr. Vermani
- study arms? units of PTX vs 8 units.
- what did it show at:
a. 30 days - sustained presence
b. 60 days - peak effect
c. 90 days - pharmacological effects
d. NO distal embolization or downstream effect at 4x dose
Levant 2 study
- what level of data and where is it published?
- What were the primary patency results at 12 months?
- What was the freedom of TLR at 12 months?
- 3 unique study considerations?
Levant 2 study
- Level 1 data published in the NEW ENDLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE.
- primary patency results at 12 months:
DCB - 73.5% (improved to 79% when sized appropriately)
PTA - 56.8% - What was the freedom of TLR was 89.7% (9/10 patients did not require reintervention at 1 year.)
- 3 unique study considerations?
a. exclude stenting (to study effects of drug)
b. extensive blinding strategy
c. stent bail-out not considered a failure
Levant 2 study procedural technique discoveries
- how did it improve primary patency?
- what are the 4 technique improvements?
- What is the suggestions for optimal results?
- from 72% to 79% in DCB.
- technique improvements:
IPTS (I Pray To snow!)
a. inflation time greater than 120 seconds
b. pressure greater than 7 atm
c. transit time to legion < 30 seconds
d. residual Stenosis less than 20%
Global Real World Registry - Lutonix
- patient #, countries, sites
- FTLR…
a. @ 12 months
b. @ 24 months
c. in long lesion @ 12 months
d. in long lesions at 24 months
e. in ISR at 12 months
f. in ISR at 24 months
Global Real World Registry - Lutonix
- 691 patient #, 38 countries, 10 sites
- FTLR…
a. 94.1% @ 12 months
b. 90.3% @ 24 months
c. 93.4% in long lesion @ 12 months
d. 89.4% in long lesions at 24 months
e. 90.7% in ISR at 12 months
f. 85.5% in ISR at 24 months
MDT IN.PACT DCB
- what is carrier?
- PTX dose?
- Half - life ?
MDT IN.PACT DCB
- Urea carrier
- PTX dose - 3.5 units/mm^2
- Half - life - 72.5 hours
LEVANT 2 vs. IN.PACT SFA I & II
4 main takeaways
PATIENT POPULATION was much more impressice with LEvant 2 study than with IN.PACT study.
- levant 2 had higher rutherford class and more restenotic lesions
- no middle pop or distal pop lesions in SFA1/2
- provisional stents 3x higher (bd 2.5% vs. mdt 7.3%)
- bd>mdt for patients with vessel run off
BD lutonix Levant 2 study vs. MDT IN.PACT in the GLOBAL REAL WORLD REGISTRY
FTLR @ 24 months difference
90.3% - BD lutonix
83.3% - MDT in.pact
FTLR @ 24 months difference