not this one allie Flashcards
What you need to know
Methods of Investigation
- The use of scientific methods and techniques which aim for objectivity.
- Formulation of testable hypotheses to promote enquiry.
- Procedures for the experimental method of investigation: independent and dependent variables.
- Advantages and disadvantages of this method of investigation (including ecological validity).
Methods of Control, Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Experimental designs:
- independent groups, repeated measures, matched pairs.
- Advantages and disadvantages of each experimental design.
- Target populations, samples and sampling methods:
- random;
- opportunity;
- systematic;
- stratified.
- Advantages and limitations of each sampling method.
- The use of standardised procedures, identification and control of extraneous variables, instructions to participants.
- Random allocation, counterbalancing and randomisation.
- Calculations, including mean, mode, median, range and percentages. Anomalous results and their possible effects.
- Graphical representations, including bar charts.
- Research in natural and experimental settings, including advantages and limitations of each
Ethical Considerations
- Candidates should demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:
- ethical issues in psychological research as outlined in the British Psychological Society guidelines
- ways of dealing with each of these issues.
methods of investigation
1.
What is the scientific / experimental method
YELLOW CARD
The use of scientific methods and techniques that aim for objectivity is called the scientific or experimental model.
Methods of investigation
2.
Define experiment
YELLOW CARD
An experiment is the manipulation of variables. The method of research in which all variables other than the independent variable (IV) and the dependent variable (DV) are controlled. This allows the researcher to identify a cause and effect relationship between the IV and DV.
Methods of investigation
3.
Procedures for the experimental method of investigation: the steps
Blue card
Most psychologists believe that studies of human behaviour should be carried out in scientific settings whenever possible. This means following procedures that have been used by all scientists. The most common is to conduct experiments by:
- Gathering information
- Studying it to identify patterns or relationships,
- Generating theories to explain these patterns or relationships
- and formulating a testable hypothesis
Methods of investigation
4. Procedures for the experimental method of investigation: ROVas
Blue card
In the experimental / scientific model the method employed to test the hypothesis should be [doggedly thorough:Rovas the dog]
- Replicable (it can be repeated)
- Objective (fact based)
- Value free (not biased by your opinions)
- Standardised (the same throughout)
Unlike some other methods that researchers use an experiment allows researchers to carefully change things and see what happens. They have greater control over what happens. The closest the researcher can get to achieving these is to use a laboratory experiment, because of the high level of control of the variables.
Methods of investigation
5. Laboratory studies as most scientific
BLUE CARD
The closest the researcher can get to ROVaS replicable, objective, value free standardised, and data is through a laboratory experiment.
This because the researcher can try to control all of the variables within the study and test for cause and effect e.g. in Milgram’s experiment (teachers and learners)
Methods of investigation
6.
An example of a study using scientific/ experimental method
Milgram
Green card
In Milgram’s famous experiment he was able to control the investigation:
- He fixed the roles of the teacher and the learner.
- He had a confederate playing the role of the learner.
- The responses that he pretended came from the learner were taped, so this was standardised.
- And the person playing the role of the experimenter/ scientist had a list of prods to use if the learner hesitated/ resisted.
Methods of investigation
7.
Examples of studies that use the scientific/ experimental model
Methods of investigation
8.
What is an Aim?
BLUE CARD
An aim identifies the purpose of the investigation. It is a straightforward expression of what the researcher is trying to find out from conducting an investigation. The aim typically involves the word “investigate” or “investigation”.
e.g. Milgram (1963) investigated how far people would go in obeying an instruction to harm another person.
Methods of investigation
9.
What are hyphotheses/
What is a hypothesis
BLUE CARD
The researcher, once they know their aim, will try to write a more precise statement which they will test to see if it holds true. It usually involves a prediction about how one variable will affect another variable. This is called a hypothesis.
When we write a hypothesis this usually involves proposing a possible relationship between two variables: the independent variable (what the researcher changes) and the dependant variable (what the research measures).
Methods of investigation
10.
Define Hypothesis
Definition …
Yellow card
A hypothesis is a precise and testable statement of what the researchers predict will be the outcome of the study. This is about the relationship between two variables (IV and DV)
When the method of investigation is an experiment this is called the experimental hypothesis
Methods of investigation
11.
Examples of Hyphotheses
Blue card
An example of an experimental hypothesis is:
Participants sitting alone will respond faster to a call for help than participants sitting with others.
Methods of investigation
12.
Independent and dependent variables
BLUE CARD
Experiments enable researchers to test cause and effect. The experimenter aims to keep all variables (things that vary) constant except the one that they are investigating. This is the independent variable. This is the variable that is manipulated ‘under the control’ of the researcher.
The researcher then measures what effect this has on another variable. This is called the dependent variable. The dependent variable is the measured outcome.
In order to write the experimental and null hypotheses for an investigation, you need to identify the key variables in the study. A variable is anything that can change or be changed, i.e. anything which can vary. Examples of variables are intelligence, gender, memory, ability, time etc.
Methods of investigation
13.
Define Independent and dependent Variables
Yellow card
Independent variable
The variable that the experimenter/ researcher manipulates or alters to look for an effect on another variable. This variable produces the two conditions of the study
Dependent variable
The variable that the researcher measures to see if the IV has affected it.
Methods of investigation
14.
How to work out the IV and DV
Blue card
You can find the IV and DV by asking yourself to complete the following:
This experiment/ study/ investigation is looking at the effect of —————— (the IV) on ———— (the DV)
The first gap in the sentence is filled in with the IV or two conditions of the experiment that are being altered or manipulated by the experimenter. The second gap will be filled with the DV or performance of the participants that the experimenter plans to measure.
E.g. in the idea of studying the question about students who listen to music. This is experiment/ study/ investigation is looking at the effect of the presence or absence of music (the IV) on the score in a learning test (the DV). Then it’s easy to write the hypothesis: E.g. the presence or absence of music has an effect on the score in a learning test.
Methods of investigation
15.
The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis
BLUE CARD
[Extra knowledge]
In research, usually the hypothesis is written in two forms, the null hypothesis, and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis states that there is no relationship between the two variables being studied (one variable does not affect the other). It states that results are due to chance and are not significant in terms of supporting the idea being investigated. It’s the opposite of the experimental hypothesis in that it states that there will be no change in behaviour. — -the alternative hypothesis states that there is a relationship between the two variables being studied (one variable has an effect on the other). It states that the results are not due to chance and that they are significant in terms of supporting the theory being investigated.———————————————————Because we can never 100% prove the alternative hypothesis. What we do instead is see if we can disprove, or reject, the null hypothesis. If we can’t reject the null hypothesis, this doesn’t really mean that our alternative hypothesis is correct – but it does provide support for the alternative / experimental hypothesis.
Methods of investigation
16.
Example of using hypotheses and variables
School concentration – late nights
Blue card
Let’s consider we’re testing if students remember better when they go to bed early than when they go to bed late. (IV=Time to bed, DV=ability to remember). Now, if we decide to study this by giving one half a test after a bed time after 10 and one half a test with a bed time before ten and then measuring their immediate recall of material covered in each session. The experimental hypothesis states that students will recall significantly more information after an early night. Note that the null hypothesis states that these will be no significant difference in the amount recalled after a late night than an early night. Any difference will be due to chance or confounding factors.
Methods of investigation
17.
Example of using hypotheses and variables
School concentration – Monday or Friday
Blue card
Let’s consider a hypothesis that many teachers might subscribe to: that students work better on Monday morning than they do on a Friday afternoon (IV=Day, DV=Standard of work). Now, if we decide to study this by giving the same group of students a lesson on a Monday morning and on a Friday afternoon and then measuring their immediate recall on the material covered in each session we would end up with the following:
The experimental hypothesis states that students will recall significantly more information on a Monday morning than on a Friday afternoon.
The null hypothesis states that these will be no significant difference in the amount recalled on a Monday morning compared to a Friday afternoon. Any difference will be due to chance or confounding factors.
Methods of investigation
18.
Yellow card
What are 3 Different types of experimental investigations?
When psychologists plan research they choose the method that is most appropriate to what they are investigation:
- Laboratory
- Field
- Natural
Methods of investigation
19.
Laboratory experiments
Blue Card
In a laboratory experiment there is a high degree of control because researchers can isolate cause and effect by controlling other variables They psychologist decides where the experiment will take place, at what time, with which participants, in what circumstances and using a standardised procedure. (E.g. Milgram)
Methods of investigation
20.
Disadvantages of Laboratory experiments
Disadvantages of laboratory experiments
- It’s an artificial setting and can intimidate participants or make them more obedient. This may bring about unnatural behaviour which doesn’t generalise to real life
- Being in a strange, formal setting; being treated impersonally by researchers reminding people that something artificial is going on. This can affect participants. These affects are called. Demand characteristics. Any features of the research that may affect participants’ behaviour making them act unnaturally or look for cues to tell them what the research is about and behave accordingly.
- Settings and tasks can be very unrealistic. This raises the question of ecological validity. Because results are generated from a situation that is unlike everyday life, to what extend can the conclusions be generalised to everyday life?
Methods of investigation
21.
Advantages of Laboratory experiments
Blue card
Advantages of laboratory experiments
- It’s easy to replicate (repeat using the same procedures) because the experimenter has control over the variables.
- Experiments are objective because the procedures are set up without biases from the researcher
- An experiment can gather quantitative date which can be easily analysed
Methods of investigation
22.
Define Demand Characteristics
Yellow card
Demand characteristics. Any features of the research that may affect participants’ behaviour, making them act unnaturally or look for cues to tell them what the research is about and behave accordingly.
Methods of investigation
23.
Define Ecological validity
Yellow card
The degree to which the findings/ conclusions from a study can be generalised to everyday life beyond the research setting?
Methods of investigation
24.
Field Experiments
Blue card
In a field experiment the psychologists manipulates the independent variable (IV)but the experiment takes place in a real life setting for example, a university, school, summer camp
(E.g. Sherif et al Robbers Cave; Eliot’s Blue eyes brown eyes; Piliavin’s study into ‘Good Samaritans)
Methods of investigation
25.
Disadvantages of Field experiments
Blue card
Disadvantages of field experiments
- Deception: because participants do not know that they are taking part in an investigation in the majority of field experiments, the researchers are deceiving them. However deception is often necessary.
- As the participants are being deceived, the researchers do not have their consent, let alone, full informed consent. However, this cannot always be obtained, as demand characteristics would then be present, and real behaviour would not be demonstrated.
Methods of investigation
26.
Advantages of Field experiments
Blue card
Advantages of field experiments
- Because the study is taking place in a natural setting, the behaviours is more likely to be more natural compared with a laboratory experiment; there is a higher ecological validity
- There is less chance of demand characteristics – with most field experiments the participants do not know that they are taking part in an investigation.
Methods of investigation
27.
Quasi or Natural experiments
Blue card
The quasi or natural experiment is one in which the independent variable occurs in real life, so the researcher cannot ‘create’ a difference for the purpose of the experiment. In a quasi experiment the IV may be age, gender or race. In a natural experiment the IV may already be occurring. ———-EG the effect of the media on eating disorders. Used a Caribbean island where TV had not been introduced and where there were no diagnoses of eating disorders. However a few years later when TV was introduced a number of girls had been diagnosed (Becker et al.) This is an example of a natural experiment, as the behaviour occurred naturally. The researchers did not manipulate anything. Some examples of what could be investigated using a natural experiment are: How people cope in a hurricane / The effect of cigarette sales after the ban on smoking ban (in public places) in the UK [consider how you might conduct such an experiment]
Methods of investigation
28.
Advantages and disadvantages of natural experiments
Blue card
Advantages of natural experiments:
- Natural experiments allow researchers to investigate behaviours that, for ethical reasons, could not be studied or created.
- Because participants are unaware that they are taking part in an investigation, there will be less chance of demand characteristics and more natural behaviour.
Disadvantages of natural experiments:
- Because the independent variable is not controlled by the investigator, there is less control from the researcher’s point of view.
Methods of investigation
29. Define condition
YELLOW CARD
An experiment is usually organised so there are two trials, after which the performances of the participants are compared. These are the conditions of the experiment.
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
30. Experimental design
Blue card
The way in which participants are assigned to groups is called the experimental design. How they are used. There are usually 2 conditions in an experiment and the researcher has to decide who will take part in each condition.
(E.g. researchers might want to know if one group of people are better at something than another group so might have 2 groups. Sometimes though 1 group experiences the independent variable and the other group (the control group) does not. )
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
31. Define Experimental Design
Yellow card
The way in which participants are assigned to groups.
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
32. Define condition
YELLOW CARD
An experiment is usually organised so there are two trials, after which the performances of the participants are compared. These are the conditions of the experiment.
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
33.
What are the 3 types of experimental design?
The 3 types of experimental design are:
- Independent groups design
- Repeated Measures design
- Matched-pairs design.
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
34.
Independent-Groups Design
Blue card
The available people for the experiment are divided into 2 groups. Each group is independent of the other. 1 group takes part in one of the conditions of the experiment; and the other takes part in the remaining condition of the experiment.
E.g. we could test the effect of different music (the IV) on a person’s recall by splitting the experimental group in two. Grp 1 could listen to pop music and group 2 to classical music. Both groups would be given the same memory test. The control group would have the memory test but no music would be played.
In laboratory and some field experiments the researcher is able to choose which participants are assigned to the experimental group and which to the control group. Assigning them to groups should be by random allocation so that everyone has an equal chance.
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
35.
What are the strengths of the independent group design?
Blue card
It’s the quickest and easiest way of allocating participants;
Because they are assigned randomly to groups there are no order effects (which occur with repeated measures)
Often the same material can be used for the tasks in both conditions
Participants cannot work out the aim of the study because they only take part in one condition.
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
36.
What are the weaknesses of the independent group design?
Blue card
Having different people in each condition could be why the results are different: People vary in their experiences, attitudes, intelligence, alertness, moods and so on. These are participant variables. Because participants are assigned randomly the researchers do not know, for example whether one group comprises most of the more alert or skilled participants. If this were the case these participant variables might produce differences between the results from the two groups that are not due to the independent variable. This is why a larger sample is needed to reduce this effect.
You need more people for the study.
Methods of control, data analysis and data presentation
37. What is random allocation?
Yellow card
Randomly assigning participants into different groups