Normal and abnormal development Flashcards
Genetic disorders affecting development (RHS of the syllabus)
Downs
Williams
Fragile X syndrome
Describe heterochronous developmental changes
Rise and fall of synaptic plasticity density differs in timing for different areas - for example, this was shown for visual, auditory and PFCs by Huttenolcher et al in 2002
What is the key message of this segment?
That timing is of the essence
What is the clinical relevance of developmental timing - understanding of paediatric brain injuries?
- what are the effects of damaging areas crucial to cognitive functions later in life?
- can the adult effects of damage be translated to understanding pediatric cases? [yes/no? hard question due to plasticity and different outcomes according to timing and affected functions]
- does the response to insults vary across domains of functioning (e.g., language, spatial cognition, executive functions)?
What is an example of a process that is less vulnerable to early brain damage than to later lesions, and that recovers for efficiently overall?
Expressive language
Describe Bates 2001 - regarding LHD and RHD damage
A 2001 study of 38 children with congenital left hemisphere damage (LHD) or right hemisphere damage (RHD) were in the normal range for their age on all measures of lexicon and grammar.
There were no significant differences between children with LHD and RHD on any measure.
When LHD children were compared directly with LHD adults (aphasia) using age-corrected z scores, the children scored far better than their adult counterparts (Bates et al, 2001)
This provides evidence for the role of plasticity in preventing such functional losses
Bates 1997 - language
children who suffered focal brain damage either prenatally or within the first 6 months of life, children with right hemisphere damage (RHD) show greater risk for delays in language comprehension (c.f. in adult in which left posterior injury to Wernickes area results in the same symptoms)
Thal 1991 - language
children with left hemisphere damage (LHD) -in particular in left posterior hemisphere (LP+)- show greater risk for difficulties in language production (c.f. in adult where left anterior injury to Brocas area results in the same symptoms)
→ - expressive vocabulary for 12-16 months in LP+ and LP- children is very similar; however, expressive vocabulary falls behind in LP+ children between 17 and 35 months (LP+ cannot follow up while LP- learn)
What may influence prenatal and postnatal development? (from intro)
Prenatal development – disrupted by migration errors (lissencephaly = lack of migration of neurons during 12-14 weeks such that gyri and sulci fail to form: psychomotor retardation, seizures etc), hormonal abnormalities (thyroid hormones, corticosteroids), maternal stress and age, maternal drug and alcohol addiction, and environmental toxins (lead, radiation, trauma)
Postnatal development – disrupted by errors affecting refinement of synapses (e.g. fragile X syndrome), birth complications (anoxia, premature birth) cerebral infections, environmental toxins and environmental experience (eg sensory deprivation)
In contrast with the apparent resilience of language development, describe how visuospatial functions are affected by early injuries
- Children with early LHD have difficulties with processing and producing both local and global aspects of their visual environment, when tested with COMPLEX NAVON FIGURES (large recognizable shapes, such as letters, composed of copies of a smaller different shape).
- Children with early RHD have difficulties with global aspects of these tasks only (Stiles et al., 2005, 2006)
Describe how executive function is affected by early injuries
• 38 children with frontal lobe lesions, tested on a variety of tasks, some tapping executive functions (e.g., Tower of London (referring specifically to deficits in planning; the test consists of two poards with pegs and beads with different colours; the examiner uses the beads and boards to present the patient with problem solving tasks), Verbal Fluency tests):
cases sustaining insults prenatally performed more poorly across the board on executive tasks and children with lesions between 7 and 9 years of age did best.
Outcome for children with lesions in early childhood and after 10 years of age was task-dependent (e.g., non-verbal; verbal) and generally poorer than controls (Jacobs, Harvey & Anderson, 2007).
What are the childhood onset developmental disorders
Attention deficit/ hypperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Autistic spectrum disorders (ASD)
Describe the introduction of childhood onset developmental disorders
Unlike acquired brain injuries, these are identified by their behavioural characteristics, and may be heterogeneous in aetiology;
the age of diagnosis and progression may differ.
It is likely that there are core neurocognitive deficits associated with these.
How has ADHD got bad press?
Often associated with mis-behaviour in children, ADHD often gets bad press - e.g. in 2007 an article was published headlined ADHD was the result of bad parenting. Alternativley bad press comes from ADHD being said to be genetically determined - Particularly because “Findings provide genetic evidence of an increased rate of large CNVs in individuals with ADHD and suggest that ADHD is not purely a social construct.” (Williams et al., 2010, Lancet)
Diagnosing ADHD
DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association) ADHD diagnostic criteria:
A. Symptoms in 2 categories: 1 (inattention) & 2 (hyperactivity)
Children must exhibit six (or more) in either category
Symptoms must have persisted for at least 6 months to an extent that is inconsistent for developmental level (based on this classified into inattentive, combined, or hyperactive type);
B. Some symptoms are present before the age of 7 (updated to 12 in DSM-V);
C. Symptoms are exhibited in two or more settings (e.g. school and home);
D. Clear evidence of clinically significant impairment in social or scholastic function;
E. Symptoms do not occur solely in the course of, or cannot be better accounted for by, another disorder