Nonprobate and Trusts Flashcards
what are our two key nonprobate points?
o rule: non-probate transfers are NOT subject to Wills Act formalities – plain and simple
if a beneficiary of a non-probate transfer predeceases the decedent, anti-lapse will not apply, thus the transfer will go to D’s estate even if the beneficiary had living issue
there is no automatic revocation on divorce
o rule: assets in a non-probate account will NOT be part of the probate estate
three key points for revocable IV trusts
o functions much like a will
o **the beneficiary of the trust has no standing to challenge the trust during the settlor’s lifetime
o **any assets within this trust when the settlor dies are not subject to probate
5 types of nonprobate transfers
- revocable IV trusts
- life insurance
- transfer or pay on death accounts
- pension/retirement plans
- transfer of real ppty
key point for POD accounts
POD contracts, though transparently testamentary, will be deemed non-testamentary and accepted as valid even without Wills Act formalities
key points for joint ownership of land
(1) tenancy in common
- presumption under the law
- each tenant has an undivided, fractional interest
(2) joint tenancy (w right of survivorship)
- each tenant has an undivided, fractional interest
- when one dies, that person’s interest is removed, and the other automatically becomes the sole owner of the ppty
(3) tenancy by the entirety
- only available for married couples
- similar to joint tenancy: each tenant has an undivided right to use and possess the whole property, AND a right of survivorship
- cannot be severed unilaterally – can only be ended by death, divorce, or the agreement of both spouses
- the benefit: allows holders to partially shield their assets from creditors
what is an express trust and what are the common types?
o private express trusts: a legally enforceable device by which a fiduciary (trustee) manages ppty for one or more beneficiaries
o title to trust ppty is bifurcated
legal title to trustee
equitable title to beneficiaries
o types of express trusts
inter vivos
• deed of trust (other trustee assigned)
• declaration of trust (settlor and trustee are same person)
testamentary
• must be deed of trust b/c T is deceased
what are the rules regarding the same person being settlor, trustee, and beneficiary?
o **note: it is totally okay for the sole trustee to be one of the beneficiaries
also, one person can even serve in all three roles, so long as the trust has at least one beneficiary who is not the sole trustee
• ex – S to S, as trustee for the benefit of S, remainder to C (good)
• ex – S to S, as trustee for the benefit of S (invalid)
o invalid because S, as trustee, owes fiduciary duties only to himself – where the sole trustee and sole beneficiary are the same person, the legal and equitable titles merge and S holds the ppty in FSA
• **your estate is equal to YOU, so doesn’t count as a separate beneficiary
what are the 8 elements to keep in mind for express trusts? what is the key thing to remember?
- *remember, only refer to the ones that are relevant to the given situation
(1) valid purpose
(2) capacity of settlor
(3) intent to create a trust
(4) delivery of the assets
(5) presence of property in the trust
(6) ascertainable beneficiaries
(7) in writing
(8) competent trustee who follows his duties
what counts as a valid purpose for a trust?
(1) trust must have a valid purpose
• anything for the benefit of beneficiaries so long as it is by law and not against public policy (can’t be criminal)
what level of capacity is required to set up a trust?
(2) settlor must have capacity to grant a trust
• the capacity required to create, amend, revoke, or add ppty to a revocable inter vivos trust, or to direct the actions of the trustee of a revocable trust, is the same as that required to make a will
• for irrevocable inter vivos trusts, the settlor must have capacity during the lifetime to transfer the ppty free of trust – contract level capacity (higher standard)
what is the test for settlor’s intent to create a trust? what are examples of precatory language that will not create a trust?
(3) settlor must have intent to create a trust
• the test: did the grantor manifest an intent to create a trust relationship (a relationship in which one person holds and manages the ppty for another)?
o we are looking for specific words
• use of the word “trust” or “trustee” is not required
Precatory Language
- desire
- hope
- request (on the line)
what are the rules for delivery of assets under a deed of trust and under a declaration of trust?
(4) settlor must deliver the assets to the trustee (usually)
• for a deed of trust: assets must be delivered to the trust and placed in the trustee’s name for such assets to be in the trust
• for a declaration of trust: a manifestation of intent by the settlor to hold certain items of his ppty, over which he already has legal title, in trust for one or more beneficiaries is sufficient for the ppty to be in trust – no further document transferring title to the ppty is required
o i.e. just need to clearly ID it as trust ppty
what are the rules regarding the need to have property in the trust? what are the exceptions? how does this look for IV trusts? testamentary trusts?
(5) trust must have ppty (res, corpus)
• **can’t be expectancy of future earnings…if it is, you need to wait until the trust has that ppty and then reaffirm the trust
o ex) a settlor’s own promissory note does not qualify as a trust (you can’t sue yourself to pay the trust)
o however, if the beneficiary has any sort of future interest in the ppty but does not currently possess it, that is sufficient
ex) if you are to inherit ppty from someone that you want to put in trust, you need to wait until that person dies so you have an active interest in the probate estate (even if the probate process is still pending)
• **doesn’t require that all the ppty be there, just some
- quasi-exceptions
o pour over wills/trusts
o life insurance trusts - for inter vivos trusts: must be funded with specifically identifiable ppty during the settlor’s lifetime to be valid
- for testamentary trusts: funded at the settlor’s death from probate assets
purchase money resulting trust
o purchase money resulting trust: if ppty is purchased by one party but titled in a second party’s name and that second pty is not a natural object of the first pty’s bounty, there is a rebuttable presumption that the second pty holds the ppty for the first pty as a resulting trust
**but if the second pty is a natural object of the person’s bounty (likely to make a gift to), there is a rebuttable presumption that the first pty made a gift of the ppty to the second pty
what is a “definite” beneficiary? are they required for trusts? what are the exceptions?
(6) trust must have ascertainable beneficiaries
• the trust must have a definite beneficiary unless it is:
a charitable trust
a trust for the care of an animal, or
a trust for a noncharitable purpose
• a beneficiary is definite if the beneficiary can be ascertained now or in the future, subject to any rule against perpetuities
when must a trust be in writing? how do oral trusts factor in?
(7) trust must be in writing (usually)
• in a majority of juris, the following trusts must be evidence by a writing signed by the settlor:
o an inter vivos trust in which part or all of the ppty is real estate
o all testamentary trusts
• evidence of oral trust (equitable doctrine)
o except as required by a statute other than this chapter, a trust need not be evidenced by a trust instrument, but the creation of an oral trust and its terms may be established only by clear and convincing evidence
o oral trust of land for a 3p
o oral trust of land for grantor
what are semi-secret and secret trusts?
• secret and semi-secret trusts
o semi-secret trusts: naming someone as trustee but not explicitly naming the beneficiaries
not a valid express trust, and because of the patent ambiguity, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to prove parameters of the trust
o secret trusts: no express language of a trust at all
not a valid express trust, but because of the latent ambiguity, extrinsic evidence is admissible to prove the existence of the trust